Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021764
Original file (20110021764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021764 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his children.

2.  The applicant states upon redeployment from Iraq he was approved for retirement only to be told he was under stop-loss and unable to retire as expected.  After receiving an exception to policy, he was given 1 week to outprocess and prepare his family to move.  Due to the late approval of his retirement, he was not properly briefed and educated on the program.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave)
* Orders 119-0001, issued by Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, Fort Riley, KS, dated 29 April 2009
* a memorandum issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Alexandria, VA, subject:  Request for Exception to Stop Loss/Stop Move Policy, dated 20 May 2009

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After completing 20 years, 3 months, and 3 days of creditable active service, the applicant retired from the Army on 30 September 2009 by reason of sufficient service for retirement.


2.  During the processing of this case, on 27 December 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the HRC, Chief, Enlisted Professional Development Branch.  The advisory official recommended granting administrative relief to the applicant because he was separated from active duty within 90 days of the
Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program implemented on 1 August 2009.  The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service.  The advisory official stated:

	a.  A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserves at the time of TEB to his/her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009).  The applicant retired from the military service on 30 September 2009.

	b.  The applicant was eligible to participate in the program and he had family members eligible to receive those benefits.

	c.  The applicant had more than 20 years of service when he retired; therefore, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation.  Furthermore, he had no record of adverse action.

3.  On 7 January 2012, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

4.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law
110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill which went into effect on 1 August 2009.

5.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members.  A service member may execute transfer of benefits only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.  The VA is responsible for final determination of eligibility for educational benefits under this program.  General eligibility criteria are as follows:

	a.  Service members must have accrued specific qualifying active service on or after 11 September 2001 of at least 30 continuous days of qualifying active duty service if discharged due to a service-connected disability or between 90 days and 36 months or more of total aggregate qualifying active duty service.

	b.  Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, 


sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service.

6.  The program guidance stipulates that if a service member becomes retirement eligible during the period beginning 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013 and agrees to serve the additional period as specified below, he/she is entitled to transfer benefits to his/her dependents.  A member is considered to be retirement eligible upon completion of 20 years of active Federal service or
20 qualifying years as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732:

	a.  service members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009 – no additional service required;

	b.  service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required;

	c.  service members eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009 and before 1 August 2010 – 1 year of additional service is required;

	d.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2010 and before 1 August 2011 – 2 years of additional service is required;

	e.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2011 and before 1 August 2012 – 3 years of additional service is required; and

	f.  active duty service members who separate, retire, transfer to the Reserve, or who are discharged on or prior to 1 August 2009 are not eligible to elect transferability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests approval of TEB under the Post-9/11 GI Bill for his children.

2.  The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or child if he had transferred the benefit before he left the service.

3.  During the initial implementation of this new program, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for 


such benefit.  This confusion was exacerbated with heavy use of the Department of Defense website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 90 days of the program implementation.  Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling.

4.  His retirement date was 30 September 2009.  It is reasonable to presume that had he been aware of the procedure to transfer his benefits while in an active duty status he would have done so.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members prior to retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.




      ___________x____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021764



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021764



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009442

    Original file (20110009442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service. The applicant departed active service on 31 August 2009 which was within 90 days of the 1 August 2009 implementation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021977

    Original file (20120021977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his family members under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had completed more than 20 years of active service at the time of retirement; therefore, he had no additional service requirement and he would have been eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his eligible family members if he had done so before he left the service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020558

    Original file (20110020558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. The applicant had over 22 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer educational benefits to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007523

    Original file (20120007523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service. The applicant had over 27 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008150

    Original file (20120008150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service. The applicant had nearly 24 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008405

    Original file (20120008405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required. The applicant had over 28 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to his eligible family members if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011004

    Original file (20120011004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter. Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010300

    Original file (20120010300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. The applicant had over 20 years of service upon his retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010807

    Original file (20120010807.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, she would have been eligible to transfer her educational benefits while still on active duty. The applicant had over 20 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and she would have been eligible to transfer the benefits if she had done so before she left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019081

    Original file (20110019081.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was authorized to transfer his educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his eligible dependents. Therefore, he would have been eligible to transfer his educational benefits while still on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application both timely and accurately and that the Army...