Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010300
Original file (20120010300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 February 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010300 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his sons.

2.  The applicant states he was not properly counseled about the program.  It had always been his intention to have one or both of his sons use his education benefit.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Retirement Orders, effective 30 September 2009
* DA Form 31 (Request and Approval for Leave) from 25 July to 30 September 2009
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)
* DA Form 137-2 Section B (Installation Standard Clearances)
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Transfer from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 2009
* 25 May 2012 letter showing TEB approval for his spouse
* 24 January 2012 Certificate of College Admission for his son
* 1 April 2012 Doctoral Completion Transcript for his spouse


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 30 September 2009, the applicant, a Regular Army lieutenant colonel (LTC), retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  He completed
20 years, 1 month, and 6 days of creditable active service.

2.  In several similar cases, advisory opinions from Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 recommended granting administrative relief because the Soldiers were separated from active duty within 90 days of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program implementation on 1 August 2009.  It was noted that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service.  The advisory opinions further stated:

	a.  A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserves at the time of TEB to his/her family members (on or after 1 August 2009).  The applicant retired from the military service on 31 August 2009; however, the TEB online database does not show he transferred benefits as he contends.

	b.  The applicant was eligible to participate in the program and he had eligible family members to receive those benefits.

	c.  The applicant had more than 20 years of service when he retired; therefore, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation.  Further, he had no record of adverse action.

3.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law
110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill that went into effect on 1 August 2009.

4.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members.  A service member may execute transfer of benefits only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.  The VA is responsible for final determination of eligibility for educational benefits under this program.  General eligibility criteria are as follows:

	a.  Service members must have accrued specific qualifying active service on or after 11 September 2001 of at least 30 continuous days of qualifying active duty service if discharged due to a service-connected disability or between 90 days and 36 months or more of total aggregate qualifying active duty service.

	b.  Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service.

5.  The program guidance stipulates that if a service member becomes retirement eligible during the period beginning 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013 and agrees to serve the additional period as specified below, he/she is entitled to transfer benefits to his/her family members.  A member is considered to be retirement eligible upon completion of 20 years of active Federal service or 20 qualifying years as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732:

	a.  service members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009 – no additional service required;

	b.  service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required;

	c.  service members eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009 and before 1 August 2010 – 1 year of additional service is required;

	d.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2010 and before 1 August 2011 – 2 years of additional service is required;

	e.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2011 and before 1 August 2012 – 3 years of additional service is required; and

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests approval of TEB under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his children.

2.  The applicant had over 20 years of service upon his retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service.

3.  During the initial implementation of this new program, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for such benefit.  This confusion was exacerbated with heavy use of the DOD website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 90 days of the program implementation.  Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling.

4.  The applicant's retirement date was 30 September 2009.  It is reasonable to presume that had he been aware of the procedure to transfer his benefits while in an active duty status he would have done so.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to all of his eligible family members prior to retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012523



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010300



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008150

    Original file (20120008150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service. The applicant had nearly 24 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009442

    Original file (20110009442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service. The applicant departed active service on 31 August 2009 which was within 90 days of the 1 August 2009 implementation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021977

    Original file (20120021977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his family members under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had completed more than 20 years of active service at the time of retirement; therefore, he had no additional service requirement and he would have been eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his eligible family members if he had done so before he left the service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016816

    Original file (20110016816.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests approval of the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to as indicated: * S.P.R. He states: * he received inaccurate, incomplete information from Army personnel regarding the TEB under the Post-9/11 GI Bill during the implementation of the program and prior to his departure from active duty in 2009 * he out-processed at Fort Monroe, Virginia on 26 June 2009 and retired on 31 August 2009; he was fully eligible to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007523

    Original file (20120007523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service. The applicant had over 27 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008405

    Original file (20120008405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required. The applicant had over 28 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to his eligible family members if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020558

    Original file (20110020558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. The applicant had over 22 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer educational benefits to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006769

    Original file (20120006769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official recommended granting the applicant administrative relief because the Post-9/11 GI Bill was implemented on 1 August 2009 and he was separated from active duty within 90 days of the program being implemented. The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or child if he had transferred the benefit before he left the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020444

    Original file (20110020444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008865

    Original file (20120008865.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service. The applicant had over 30 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would...