Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007458
Original file (20120007458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007458 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of the severance pay he received for an injury he incurred in the line of duty.  In effect, he requests issuance of a 15-year letter of eligibility for non-Regular retirement at age 60.

2.  The applicant states the provisions for a 15-year non-Regular retirement did not exist at the time he was discharged.

3.  The applicant provides:

* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service)
* DA Form 2139 (Military Pay Voucher)
* physical disability memorandum, endorsement, and orders
* DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings)
* Honorable Discharge Certificate
* medical documents
* authorization for hospitalization
* DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status)
* DD Form 689 (Sick Call Slip)
* medical progress notes
* DA Form 4700 (Medical Record – Supplemental Medical Data)
* Standard Form 502 (Medical Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care)
* 
DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 19 November 1947.

3.  The available records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 January 1968 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist).

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 22 October 1969 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 9 months, and 19 days of creditable active service.

5.  The available records also show he served with the 404th Signal Detachment, a U.S. Army Reserve unit in Mason City, IA, from 1973 to 1976.  He then served with a Reserve artillery unit in Garner, IA, from 1976 to 1978.

6.  The available records further show he enlisted in the Iowa Army National Guard (ARNG) on 23 May 1978 and he held MOS 63B (Light Wheel Power Generation Mechanic).

7.  He appears to have served through multiple extensions in the ARNG in a variety of stateside assignments and he attained the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.  He was assigned to the 1133rd Transportation Company, Mason City, IA.

8.  On 3 May 1983 during annual training (30 April to 15 May 1983) and while moving a 5-ton tractor, he slid out of the driver's seat and sprained/strained his hip and thigh.  He was transported to a hospital in Texarkana, TX, where he received medications.  He was seen at a different clinic the following day where he was x-rayed and given crutches.

9.  The applicant gradually developed increased pain over his left groin and left hip region.  He was evaluated on multiple occasions and initially diagnosed as having chronic abductor strain.  His pain persisted and it appears that he was unable to perform his military duties.  His final diagnosis was that of left hip and groin pain, unknown etiology.  He was recommended for entry into the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES).

10.  On 5 March 1985, a PEB convened in San Francisco, CA.  The PEB found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and specialty and determined that he was physically unfit due to chronic left hip and groin pain.  He was rated under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities, assigned code 8730, and granted a 0-percent disability rating.  The PEB recommended his separation from the service with entitlement to severance pay.  The applicant concurred with the PEB's findings and recommendation and waived his right to a formal hearing.

101.  He was honorably discharged from the ARNG on 2 April 1985.  His NGB Form 22 shows he was discharged under the authority of paragraph 7-10n of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) by reason of "other good and sufficient reasons as determined by the State Adjutant General."

12.  His NGB Form 22 also shows he completed 6 years, 10 months, and 10 days of ARNG service during this period with 8 years, 5 months, and 9 days of prior Reserve Component (RC) service as well as 1 year, 9 months, and 19 days of prior active service for a total of 17 years, 1 month, and 8 days of total service for pay.

13.  On 4 April 1985, the U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, published Orders D61-17 discharging him from the ARNG in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 2 April 1985 by reason of physical disability with entitlement to severance pay based on 3 years, 3 months, and 26 days of service computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1208.

14.  The computation of his qualifying years of service for retired pay is not available for review.  Neither his Army Reserve Personnel Command 
Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) nor his NGB Form 23 (ARNG Retirement Points History Statement) could be found.

15.  The applicant reached age 60 on 16 August 2007.

16.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731, provides the legal age and service requirements for non-Regular retirement.  It states a person is entitled to retired pay upon application if the person has reached age 60, has performed at least 20 qualifying years of service computed under section 12732 of this title, and is not entitled to retired pay from an Armed Force or retainer pay as a member of the Fleet Reserve or the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve under any other provision of law.  A qualifying year under this system is a year in which the member earns at least 50 retirement points during the retirement year.

17.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731b, effective 5 October 1999, provides a special rule for members with physical disabilities not incurred in the line of duty. 
It states that in the case of a member of the Selected Reserve of an RC who no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability, the Secretary concerned may, for the purpose of section 12731 of this title, determine to treat the member as having met the service requirement and provide the member with notification required if the member completed at least 15 years but less than 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes.  This special provision of the law is applicable only to members who are medically disqualified for continued service in an RC.

18.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 prescribes the criteria, policies, processes, procedures, and responsibilities to classify, assign, utilize, transfer within and between states, and separate ARNG enlisted Soldiers.  Chapter 8 provides for separation of enlisted Soldiers.  Paragraph 8-26y of the version in effect at the time provided for the discharge from State ARNG and/or Reserve of the Army of Soldiers medically unfit for the retention standards of chapter 3, Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness).  It also stated that if a commander suspected a Soldier might not be medically qualified for retention, he or she would direct the Soldier to present himself or herself for a medical examination.  A complete medical examination would be accomplished and the results forwarded to the unit commander for disposition.  If retention was not recommended, a request for discharge would be submitted to the State Adjutant General.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant sustained an injury in line of duty in 1983.  He was seen by various medical specialists and recommended for entry into the PDES.  He appears to have undergone a medical evaluation board which recommended his consideration by a PEB.  The PEB found his medical condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his military specialty and grade.  The PEB recommended his separation with entitlement to severance pay.  He concurred.

2.  By law, RC members are required to complete 20 years of qualifying service to be eligible for non-Regular retirement.  However, effective 8 October 1999, a member of the Selected Reserve of an RC who is medically disqualified for continued service in an RC due to a non-duty related condition may be considered as having met the service requirement and may be issued a Notification for Eligibility for Non-Regular Retired Pay at Age 60 (15-year letter) if the member completed at least 15 years but less than 20 years of qualifying service for non-Regular retirement purposes.

3.  In this case, it is unclear if the applicant had completed 15 qualifying years toward non-Regular retirement.  However, the law to allow the 15-year retirement went into effect in October 1999 and his unfitting condition was duty related, not non-duty related.  The applicant was discharged in 1985 prior to the effective date of the law.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007458



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007458



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016282

    Original file (20090016282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the following: a. he was not afforded due process when he was medically retired from the Army National Guard (ARNG) and placed on the "Permanent Disability Retired List" without being processed through the PDES; b. he twice forwarded his discharge orders, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22E (Report of Separation and Record of Service), NGB Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement), DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits), and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016872

    Original file (20100016872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve and issued a Notification of Eligibility for Non-Regular Retired Pay at Age 60 (15-Year Letter) instead of being discharged for disability with severance pay. The PEB recommended that he be discharged with a 10% disability rating with severance pay. The PEB determined he was physically unfit and recommended a 10% rating and his separation with entitlement to severance pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007123.

    Original file (20140007123..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) records as follows: * have the TNARNG complete a line of duty (LOD) investigation * have the TNARNG process him through the medical evaluation board/physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB) * medical retirement by reason of disability 2. Chapter 3 provides for various medical conditions and physical defects which may render a Soldier unfit for further military service and which fall below the standards required for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017658

    Original file (20100017658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was medically boarded from the military. A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), initiated by the patient administrator on 6 October 2003 and completed by the unit commander on 3 November 2003, prepared at Fort Sam Houston, TX, shows she incurred a stress fracture to her right hip while attending BCT at Fort Jackson, SC, in November 2002. On 30 January 2004, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00682

    Original file (PD2011-00682.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB and VA rated the left hip condition 10% based on the evidence of the service treatment record (STR) and orthopedic NARSUM examination. In consideration of this evidence, and IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must recommend a separation rating of 50% for the OSA condition. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019474

    Original file (20110019474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Standard Form 600 shows he was seen by a physician on 2 January 2004 for a complaint of lower back pain that had been recurring for 2 months. The evidence shows the applicant's chain of command failed to complete and/or submit an LOD investigation and ensure the applicant was properly referred to the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) and Department of Defense (DOD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016705

    Original file (20120016705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * orders * a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile) * three DA Forms 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * medical documents CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Orders 083-074 MD-STARC-ARP, issued by Headquarters, Maryland National Guard, Fifth Regiment Armory, dated 30 May 2003, honorably discharging the applicant from the MDARNG and assigning him to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 1 June 2003 due to being found to be medically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023154

    Original file (20110023154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant now requests: a. placement on continuous active duty orders from the date of his mobilization on 1 May 2006 through his retirement date of 29 August 2011; b. payment/credit (pay, benefits, and retirement credit) as a result of his placement on continuous active duty orders; c. reimbursement for TRICARE premiums he made while not covered (as a result of being on incapacitation pay) during the previously mentioned time frame; and d. voidance of all previous DD Forms 214/NGB Forms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009966

    Original file (20130009966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the determination of "Not in Line of Duty - Not Due to Own Misconduct" be changed to "In Line of Duty" in order for his case to be processed by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The advisory official provided the following discussion in support of the recommendation for disapproval of the applicant's request that the determination of "Not in Line of Duty - Not Due to Own Misconduct" be changed to "In Line of Duty" in order for his case to be processed by an MEB. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010661

    Original file (20110010661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-Regular Service), paragraph 2-1b(2), in order for a Soldier to be eligible they must "... not have elected to receive disability severance pay in lieu of retired pay at age 60. Reserve personnel involuntarily relieved from active duty who are not eligible for retired pay at time of release, but who are paid readjustment pay under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code 687, are eligible to receive retired pay...