IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 1 May 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120007375
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
9. On 11 April 2012, new information was received from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110003997, dated 22 November 2011.
10. The evidence submitted consists of an email, dated 11 April 2012, which states:
a. the entry "100" in item 16 (Days Accrued Leave Paid) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) is incorrect since a service member can sell only 60 days in a career in most cases. The correct entry for item 16 of his DD Form 214 should be 24.5.
b. the entry in item 1c of the Board Determination/Recommendation is incorrect because lump-sum leave is sold at the price of base pay, only. It is not computed on full pay and allowances.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
6. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20110003997, dated 22 November 2011, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicantÂ’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.
7. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20110003997 erroneously stated in:
a. paragraph 1b of the Board Determination/Recommendation the entry "deleting from item 16 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 August 2010 the entry "10" and replacing it with the entry "124.5"; and "
b. paragraph 1c of the Board Determination/Recommendation the entry "paying him for 22.5 days of leave (computed based on full pay and allowances)"
8. Per DFAS guidance:
a. the entry in paragraph 1b of the Board Determination/Recommendation should state "deleting from item 16 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending
24 August 2010 the entry "100" and replacing it with the entry "24.5"; and"
b. the entry in paragraph 1c of the Board Determination/Recommendation should state "paying him for 22.5 days of leave."
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records set forth in Docket Number AR20110003997, dated 22 November 2011, by deleting the entry in:
a. paragraph 1b of the Board Determination/Recommendation and replacing it with the entry "deleting from item 16 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 August 2010 the entry "100" and replacing it with the entry "24.5"; and"
b. paragraph 1c of the Board Determination/Recommendation and replacing it with the entry "paying him for 22.5 days of leave."
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007375
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Supplemental Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120007375
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003997
In FY 2010, he earned 27 days (1 October 2009 through 24 August 2010) accruing a leave balance of 124.5 days of leave. k. the Commanding General, Army Human Resources Command, is the approval authority for requests for special leave accrual. DFAS records also show he earned 27 days (1 October 2009 through 24 August 2010) in FY 2010, accruing a leave balance of 124.5 days of leave.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001971
The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 October 2010 be corrected. Her DFAS LES, dated 5 November 2010, shows her pay grade as E-3. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The DFAS information which shows the applicant was separated in the pay grade of E-3 on 16 October 2010 is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005613
The DFAS Case Management System extract provided by the applicant shows: * applicant was separated from active duty to accept an active commission * the Chaplain Corps requires the Soldier to receive a Reserve Commission and attend the seminary * the SPD Code on his DD Form 214 does not allow payment of accrued leave * a request for waiver of his SPD code was initiated to allow officer payment for his 30 days leave 6. The applicant was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014182
On or about 8 August 2012, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed this Board that it was unable to implement paragraph 1b of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION in Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20110020924 dated 12 July 2012. That paragraph requested DFAS to do a complete audit of the applicantÂ’s Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) and pay him all due temporary duty (TDY) travel entitlements. BOARD VOTE: ___X ___ ___X____ ___X...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028516
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 September 2010 be corrected. Records from DFAS show his pay grades as: * Pay grade E-3 from 11 August 2009 through 14 February 2010 * Pay grade E-4 from 15 February 2010 through 2 September...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002521
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * she was awarded the Legion of Merit (LOM) instead of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) * the correct dates of her deployment to Kuwait 2. She provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award) with LOM and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) certificates *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004316
However, his DD Form 214 shows he was honorably discharged on 30 June 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of a physical condition, not a disability. Records from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirmed: * he was separated on 20 July 2011 with an effective date of 30 June 2011 * this created a debt for $3,738.18 of his reenlistment bonus, which was taken from any final pay he had, and left him owing a debt of $1,584.89 * he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016924
At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20100024637, dated 10 November 2010, it was the intent of the ABCMR to provide affected members the opportunity to use authorized PDMRA days upon their next qualifying deployment/mobilization, not to provide monetary compensation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant is authorized to use 100 days of PDMRA upon the next qualifying...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002777
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records set forth in Docket Number AR20100025221, dated 3 December 2010, by replacing paragraph 1a and 1b of the original BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION with the following paragraphs: Paragraph 1a - "retroactively placing the individual concerned on the TDRL for a minimum of six months at no less than 50 percent disability rating for PTSD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000045
His DOR should be adjusted due to the State G-1's failure to submit his Federal Recognition 90 days prior to the Army Promotion List (APL) mandatory promotion board. m. On 2 November 2010, the FY 2011 Captain APL Board convened and recommended him for promotion to captain on a published list, dated 3 March 2011. n. Based on law, regulation, and NGB policy, his PRARNG unit should have proceeded with the promotion process when he was selected for promotion by the vacancy promotion board. (5)...