Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007785
Original file (20120007785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  20 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007785 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request for the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) through a Member of Congress.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  he was hit in his right hand by a piece of shrapnel during a firefight in Vietnam on 5 April 1968.  He was sent to a forward medical station where the shrapnel was removed from his hand and he was subsequently sent to a medical facility for further treatment.  When his hand had healed he returned to his company in the field.  He never received the Purple Heart for his wound.

	b.  he should have received the CIB since he had been under enemy fire in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Correspondence from a Member of Congress
* Letter, dated 27 February 2012, from the Awards and Decorations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* Standard Form (SF) 89 (Report of Medical History)
* Radiographic report, dated 11 April 1968
* Health record, dated April 1968
* Letter, dated 26 September 2011, from a fellow Soldier at the time in question with attachments

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110006123, on 22 September 2011.

2.  The applicant provides an SF 89, dated 22 April 1968, which shows he received a fragment wound to the third right finger on 5 April 1968 in Vietnam.

3.  He submits an Army buddy statement, dated 26 September 2011, from a fellow Soldier at the time in question who attests:

* He served with the applicant in Vietnam from February 1968 to February 1969
* They were in the same company and platoon for the entire year
* He (fellow Soldier) received the CIB
* Their company performed numerous combat assaults in Vietnam
* The applicant spent well over 300 days in the field/jungle during their tour
* The applicant earned the CIB within the first 4 days of being in country
* Following the 5 April 1968 battle, the applicant showed him his hand where he had received shrapnel
* He did not receive treatment for it immediately
* His hand became infected and he was subsequently transported for treatment
* The applicant returned to the unit
* The omission of awarding the CIB to the applicant is an injustice to his service and participation in the many battles and firefights during his tour in Vietnam 

4.  The documentation provided by the applicant is new evidence that will be considered by the Board.   

5.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 September 1967.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (infantry indirect fire crewman) and later MOS 11B (light weapons infantryman).  He served in MOS 11C assigned to the 1st Battalion, 35th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division in Vietnam from 20 February 1968 to 4 February 1969.  On 5 September 1969, he was honorably released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  
6.  His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart or the CIB as authorized awards.

7.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart or CIB in the available records.

8.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the Purple Heart or CIB.

9.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.

10.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  

13.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation stated the criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the CIB was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, "the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day-to-day combat."  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to officers, enlisted personnel, and warrant officers who held an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was hit in his right hand by a piece of shrapnel during a firefight in Vietnam on 5 April 1968.  

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for the Purple Heart and all other awards.  The Purple Heart requires:

* a wound the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by military medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records

3.  Although the SF 89 provided by the applicant shows he received a fragment wound to his right hand on 5 April 1968, it does not state this wound was the result of hostile action.  

4.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.  There is also no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  In the absence of corroborating evidence of record showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the Army buddy statement and documentation provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for awarding the Purple Heart.

5.  He contends he should have received the CIB since he had been under enemy fire in Vietnam.  Evidence shows he held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry company in Vietnam.  However, there is no evidence of record that shows he served in active ground combat.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110006123, dated 22 September 2011.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007785





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007785



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006123

    Original file (20110006123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no medical evidence in the applicant's available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action during his active service. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073851C070403

    Original file (2002073851C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thomas B___ states that he and the applicant were both members of the Reconnaissance Platoon of the 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry (Airborne), 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam. Absent his service medical records, there is insufficient evidence to show the fragmentation wounds that occurred in 1966 were the result of hostile action. NOTE : The Board requests the Army Review Board Agency's Support Division amend the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027863

    Original file (20100027863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 20 April 1970 to 16 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing he was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statement provided by the applicant alone is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027684

    Original file (20100027684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Evidence shows that while the applicant, an infantry Soldier, was assigned to an infantry unit as an automatic rifleman in the RVN he was wounded as a result of hostile action on 21 August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069140C070402

    Original file (2002069140C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In addition, the Board concludes that because the applicant was wounded in action and as a result was medically evacuated from the RVN, he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device, and that it would also be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time. RECOMMENDATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016240

    Original file (20130016240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 15 November 1967 through 17 April 1970...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001070C070205

    Original file (20060001070C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. This ruling, in effect, granted the Service Secretaries the authority to award the Purple Heart to individuals directly engaged in armed conflict that were killed or wounded as a result of "friendly fire." Therefore, in the absence of official documentary evidence substantiating medical treatment of the applicant's wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004979

    Original file (20080004979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned duties as a rifleman and assistant gunner with an infantry unit; however, there is no evidence, and the applicant provided none to show he served in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit serving in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811

    Original file (20140004811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008176

    Original file (20100008176.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 clearly shows he was wounded in action on 9 April 1968 and awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his period of service from 3 November 1966 through 1 November 1968 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...