Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004675
Original file (20080004675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  29 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004675 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show specialist  
(SP4), E-4 instead of private first class permanent, PFC (P) (E-3).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his record does not reflect the correct rank at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and an Honorable Discharge Certificate dated 15 April 1980.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 January 1964.  He completed the necessary training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 76K (General Supply Specialist).

3.  His personnel record shows he served continuously on active duty until he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve on 11 January 1966.  He completed 2 years and 4 days of Net Service This Period.

4.  Item 3a and 3b (Date of Rank) of his DD Form 214 show the entries "PFC (P) (E-3)" and "1 Sep 65."

5.  Headquarters, XIX U.S. Army Corps, Special Orders Number 171, dated  
1 September 1965 shows that the applicant was appointed to permanent grade PFC, E-3.

6.  The applicant’s personnel record shows he was promoted to SP4,  
E-4, effective 6 June 1978, while assigned to an Army National Guard unit.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that you enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.  Enter the date of rank shown and if the date of rank is different from the date of appointment, enter the date of appointment in the remarks section of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that Item 3a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show SP4, E-4 instead of PFC (P), E-3.

2.  There is no evidence that the applicant was promoted beyond the pay grade of E-3 before separating from active duty.  His record shows that he was permanently appointed in pay grade E-3 on 1 September 1965 before separation.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show SP4, E-4 in item 3a of his DD Form 214.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its record.  The data/information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the record was created.
4.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, those records should not be changed.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.


 _   _______   X______________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004675



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004675



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002553

    Original file (20150002553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his rank was SP4/E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. The applicant’s records are not available for the Board to review; however, there is sufficient evidence provided by the applicant to address his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003815

    Original file (20120003815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held the permanent rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and he was entitled to pay at the E-5 rate upon separation. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013415

    Original file (20110013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 at the time of his release from active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he held the rank of SP4/E-4 at the time of REFRAD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018855

    Original file (20070018855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant states, in effect, he was a SGT/E-5 when he was discharged from military service. _ ___X____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011907

    Original file (20120011907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Following MOS training and an assignment to Fort Leonard Wood, MO, he served in Vietnam from on or about 11 September 1965 to 10 September 1966. The governing regulation provides that the DD Form 214 will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003152

    Original file (20150003152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the rank and grade on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and that he be paid the monies he was due for his separation pay when he was released from active duty on 16 September 1966, plus the interest accrued. His record contains: a. Regardless, the statute of limitations for a claim against the Government expired in 1972, 6 years after the date of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002794

    Original file (20140002794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains a DA Form 24 (Service Record) which shows in: * section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) – he was assigned to the 573d Transportation Detachment performing duties as an aircraft electrician from 8 October 1963 to 23 October 1964 * section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) – he was credited with service in Vietnam from 8 October 1963 to 25 October 1964 4. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019284

    Original file (20100019284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, restoration of his rank to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and correction of DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this rank. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade in which an enlisted Soldier was serving at the time of separation with an indication whether it was a permanent or a temporary grade. The evidence of record shows he was reduced to the permanent grade of RCT/E1 on 20 November 1959 by an SPCM conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010248

    Original file (20140010248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his rank was PFC/E-3 at the time of his release from active duty, but his rank was SP4/E-4 at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Item 3a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 shows his rank and grade as PFC/E-3. Therefore, there is no basis to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank and grade as SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018511

    Original file (20090018511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. He also submitted a copy of an AGPZ Form 977, dated 11 July 1969, showing his retired grade as SP4 in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372. There is no evidence to confirm he was promoted to pay grade E-4 prior to 9 September 1966 and available military records do not contain a copy of his retirement orders showing his highest grade held.