Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002915
Original file (20120002915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  30 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002915 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states he requested correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of the awards he is entitled to based on his military service.

   a.  In its original consideration of his request, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) noted in the Consideration of Evidence (paragraph 6) that there was no adverse information in his record "that would suggest he was considered not eligible for award of the Good Conduct Medal."

   b.  As part of his request, the ABCMR corrected his separation date from active duty and also authorized award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation. However, the Board failed to make a determination on the Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 August 1963 for a period of
3 years.

2.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service):
* Thailand from 2 January 1964 through 1 January 1965
* Okinawa from 29 November 1965 through 23 July 1966

	b.  item 33 (Appointments and Reductions):  he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 with a date of rank of 18 November 1964; and

   c.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows (in part):

* Principal Duty:  Service School - Engineer Equipment Repairer
* Organization:  Company A, 1st Battalion, 4th Brigade, U.S. Army Training Center, Engineer, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
* Period:  14 October 1963 through 3 January 1964
* Conduct:  "Good"
* Efficiency:  "Good"

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214, as corrected by a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), issued on 23 April 2012, shows he entered active duty this period on 9 August 1963, was honorably released from active duty on 4 August 1966, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve to complete his Reserve obligation.

   a.  He had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 26 days of active service this period.

   b.  He was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar, National Defense Service Medal, and Meritorious Unit Commendation.

4.  A review of the applicant's military service records failed to reveal evidence of any disciplinary actions, adverse information, a commander's disqualification for the Army Good Conduct Medal, or general orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after
27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  


Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal because the ABCMR failed to make a determination on the award in the original Record of Proceedings.

2.  The applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal from 9 August 1963 to 4 August 1966.

   a.  There is no evidence of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification for the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  However, records show the applicant received a conduct and efficiency rating of "Good" during the period 14 October 1963 through 3 January 1964, which is disqualifying.
   
   b.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002915



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002915



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019236

    Original file (20100019236.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award 2. The applicant states: * his service was honorable and exceptional yet he was not awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal because he took an early discharge from combat service in Vietnam * Army Regulation allows for the belated award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) established...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012464

    Original file (20070012464.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation (AR) 672-5-1, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was awarded the Air Medal for some of the missions and hours flown and recorded on the MACV Form 201 he provided the Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018002

    Original file (20090018002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 23 September 1969 to 22 September 1970; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012047

    Original file (20080012047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show all marksmanship badges and unit citations. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019695

    Original file (20080019695.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. In the interest of justice and based on the evidence and certificate provided by the applicant it would be appropriate to list his service in Vietnam from May 1964 to September 1964. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011543

    Original file (20070011543.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 19 January 1969, shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was assigned to the 86th Engineer Battalion during the period this unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018511

    Original file (20100018511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 20 September 1963 through 19 September 1966. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013554

    Original file (20060013554.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 reflects that he served 2 years, 10 months, and 24 days in Thailand, when in fact he served in Vietnam from July 1963 until the end of 1964, when he was transferred to Thailand. This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003326

    Original file (20130003326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940. The applicant's records do not show any indiscipline or lost time, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of military service, and there is no record of a commander's disqualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025382

    Original file (20100025382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 December 1963. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 December 1963 to 7 September 1966 and adding it to his DD Form 214. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...