Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025382
Original file (20100025382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025382 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). 

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he was told by his sergeant major that he was recommended for award of the AGCM when he changed permanent duty stations 44 years ago.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 December 1963.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

* item 31 (Foreign Service) – Germany from 5 May 1964 to 29 May 1966
* item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) – promotion to specialist five/E-5 (temporary) effective 28 May 1966
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) – Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 24th Infantry Division from 22 May 1964 to 25 May 1966
* item 38 – "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 September 1966 shows he:

* was honorably released from active duty
* completed 2 years, 9 months, and 2 days of active service
* was authorized the National Defense Service Medal

5.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The available evidence shows the applicant served honorably from 6 December 1963 to 7 September 1966 and he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his tenure of service.  There is no evidence of any derogatory information in his record that would have disqualified him for award of the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal.


BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 December 1963 to 7 September 1966 and adding it to his DD Form 214.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025382



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006163

    Original file (20110006163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides the following: * Two DD Forms 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DA Forms 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) * Special Orders Number 64, dated 19 December 1966 * General Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017191

    Original file (20090017191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he had completed 2 years, 2 months, and 20 days of active military service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (30 March 1962-19 June 1964). The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was convicted by an SCM on 15 August 1963, and that he received less than "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during the qualifying period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017791C070206

    Original file (20050017791C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show his date of birth as 6 December 1942 vice 7 December 1942. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show this date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected as follows: a. by showing his date of birth on his DD Form 214 as 6 December 1942; and b. by awarding him the AGCM for service from 30 June 1960 to 28 June 1963 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019837

    Original file (20100019837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. It would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019236

    Original file (20100019236.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award 2. The applicant states: * his service was honorable and exceptional yet he was not awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal because he took an early discharge from combat service in Vietnam * Army Regulation allows for the belated award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) established...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015735

    Original file (20130015735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016908

    Original file (20140016908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for the AGCM. His military service qualifies him for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002915

    Original file (20120002915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In its original consideration of his request, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) noted in the Consideration of Evidence (paragraph 6) that there was no adverse information in his record "that would suggest he was considered not eligible for award of the Good Conduct Medal." The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal because the ABCMR failed to make a determination on the award in the original Record of Proceedings. The applicant served a qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014159

    Original file (20140014159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was authorized the AFEM for his service in the RVN and his records show he was awarded the service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007312

    Original file (20130007312.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in: * Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions), he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 effective 9 October 1965 * Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) – * where recorded, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings * on 16 September 1965, he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with Company A, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division * Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States), he departed the United...