Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012047
Original file (20080012047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        15 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012047 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show all marksmanship badges and unit citations.

2.  The applicant states that he served with the 307th Engineer Battalion of the 82nd Airborne Division, but his record does not show any unit citations or marksmanship badges.

3.  The applicant provides a picture of a Soldier in uniform, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 27 March 1963.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76K (General Supply Specialist).  He was honorably separated and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 26 March 1966.  The highest rank/grade he attained during his military service was specialist five (SP5)/E-5.

3.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Parachutist Badge and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  Item 26 does not show awards of marksmanship badges and unit citations.

4.  Headquarters, 2nd Training Regiment, U.S. Army Training Center, Engineer, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, Special Orders Number 94, dated 13 May 1963, show the applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1).

5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to the 307th Engineer Battalion, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and received an "Excellent" efficiency and conduct rating throughout his military service.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Presidential Unit Citation (known as the Distinguished Unit Citation until 3 November 1966) is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action.  A unit must display such gallantry, determination and esprit de corps in accomplishing its mission as would warrant award of the Distinguished Service Cross to an individual. 

7.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia), in pertinent part, states that unit awards are authorized for permanent wear by an individual who was assigned and present for duty with the unit at any time during the period cited or who was attached to and present for duty with the unit for at least 30 consecutive days of the period cited.  Furthermore, this regulation also states that an individual who was not present with a unit during the period cited for permanent wear of a unit award may be authorized temporary wear only for the duration of assignment to the unit.

8.  Review of the applicant's records indicates his entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214.


9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.  This regulation also provides that the second and subsequent awards of the National Defense Service Medal are denoted by a bronze service star affixed to the National Defense Service Medal.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Special Orders awarded the applicant the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1), which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

3.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 27 March 1963 to 26 March 1966.  He attained the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 and received an "Excellent" conduct and efficiency rating throughout his career.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

4.  With respect to award of a unit citation, the evidence of record shows that the 307th Engineer Battalion received several awards and accolades throughout its history; however, none was awarded during the applicant's assignment to this unit.  By regulation, an individual who was not present with a unit during the period cited for permanent wear of a unit award may be authorized temporary wear only for the duration of assignment to the unit.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  __X_____  __X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 27 March 1963 to 26 March 1966; and

	b.  showing award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1), and the national Defense Service Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to any unit citations. 



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012047



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012047



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002288

    Original file (20150002288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record confirms GO awarded the applicant the Purple Heart and the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) with “V” Device while his DD Form 214 only shows the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001453

    Original file (20120001453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * Presidential Unit Citation * Four awards of the Purple Heart * Special Operations Commemorative Medal * Joint Service Commendation Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal * Air Assault Badge * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross 2. Additionally, it would also be appropriate to amend GO Number 162, issued by Headquarters, 12th Support Brigade, Fort Bragg, NC, on 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021852

    Original file (20100021852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period of service in Vietnam from 21 May 1967 to 30 December 1968 for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. In the absence of derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his records to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020164

    Original file (20110020164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 2 (Service Number) shows his service number as RAXXXXX022. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and “SPS M-16” entries from item 24 of his DD Form 214; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14 and M-16) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008975C080213

    Original file (20070008975C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 June 1972 be corrected to add the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, and five bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal. Except for one Article 15, which did not prevent his receiving the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, there is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005589

    Original file (20130005589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he was credited with service in Vietnam from 12 December 1966 through 18 November 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he served in two units while in Vietnam – * Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 3rd Squadron, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, from 12 December 1966 to 16 April 1967 * Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, from 17 April to 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012974

    Original file (20080012974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 March 1969 shows award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (3d Award), the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the National Defense Service Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), the Army Commendation Medal, the Purple Heart, and the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 September 1970 shows he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) and two overseas service bars. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019239

    Original file (20100019239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to: * delete from items 5a, 5b, and 6 the entries "SP4 (T)," "E-4,"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020830

    Original file (20110020830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows award of the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * two overseas service bars * Army Commendation Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 4. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007327

    Original file (20140007327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period of service qualifies him for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the...