Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001227
Original file (20120001227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001227 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his rank be reinstated to specialist four/E-4 and he be reimbursed all pay and allowances.

2.  The applicant states:

* He wants to be reimbursed all pay and allowances lost from the date of his demotion to his separation date
* He reported to the doctor in Korea complaining of problems with chronic hearing loss, tinnitus, and stress
* The doctor ordered him to stay on the base
* His commanding officer saw him the next day and ordered him back to the Tactical Operations Center (TOC)
* He disobeyed his commanding officer because he thought the doctor's orders would counter his commanding officer's orders

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 August 1970 for a period of 2 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 16D (Hawk Missile Crewman).  He arrived in Korea on 17 January 1971.  He was appointed to E-4 on 20 April 1971.  

3.  Orders, dated 20 October 1971, reduced him to private first class/E-3 effective 5 September 1971 for misconduct (Article 15).  His Article 15 is not available, but records indicate he was punished for disobeying a lawful order from his battery commanding officer.

4.  He departed Korea on 12 February 1972.  On 7 March 1972, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of private first class and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

5.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was:

* appointed to E-4 effective 20 April 1971
* reduced to E-3 effective 5 September 1971

6.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was appointed to pay grade E-4 after 5 September 1971.

7.  The doctrine of laches is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, sixth edition, as the neglect to assert a right or claim which, taken together with lapse of time and other circumstances causing prejudice to the adverse party, operates as a bar in a court of equity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, his military records show he was reduced from E-4 to E-3 on 5 September 1971.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was appointed to pay grade E-4 after 
5 September 1971 or prior to his separation on 7 March 1972.  

2.  It is now more than 40 years after the applicant’s reduction.  The Article 15 that reduced him is not available.  An arbitrary ruling in his favor, without knowing what his records would have shown, would cause prejudice to the Government and the doctrine of laches is invoked in his case.  

3.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence with which to grant the requested relief.
 
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001227





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001227



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002820

    Original file (20110002820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows he was promoted to SP4 on 6 December 1968, the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty and he held this rank until he was reduced to PFC for misconduct on 22 August 1969. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant was granted de facto status during the period he erroneously held the rank of SGT from 5 November 1970 to 22 November 1972. Based on the applicant's erroneous promotion to SGT and lacking evidence to corroborate the applicant's claim he did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014371

    Original file (20110014371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003367

    Original file (20120003367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His military pay record is not available for review and there is no indication on his DD Form 214 that his final pay was less than the grade shown on this form. There is no evidence and he has not provided any evidence to show he was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002560

    Original file (20120002560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests combat pay for his service in Korea. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. However, without evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed he received combat pay during the period he was in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007610

    Original file (20130007610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 and that he be paid back pay and allowances due him. The applicant has provided duly authenticated orders issued on the day he departed for assignment to Vietnam showing he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SP5 E-5 on 10 January 1970. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011255

    Original file (20130011255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for correction of his military records to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a Reserve Component retirement in the rank of sergeant first class. The applicant stated he was suffering from PTSD at the time and should have been medically retired. There is no evidence in his records showing he was placed in the Army Weight Control Program and/or he was injured or diagnosed with PTSD prior to his USAR discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003822

    Original file (20090003822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant was released from active duty on 15 September 1975 in pay grade E-3 and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) on the following day. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019845

    Original file (20140019845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he was not absent without leave (AWOL) from 25 February through 8 March 1971. On 22 March 1971, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being AWOL from 25 February through 8 March 1971 (12 days).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028027

    Original file (20100028027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. He applied for appointment as a WO in MOS 973A again, was selected, and was appointed in October 1982. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was selected for appointment as a WO prior to 1982. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was appointed as a USAR WO in the rank of WO1 in 1980 with corresponding adjustment of the effective dates of his promotions to CW2 and CW3 as a result of this correction because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015520C071029

    Original file (20060015520C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) and number as “Rifleman 745” and to delete the reference to nine days of lost time from item 55 (Remarks). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...