Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019845
Original file (20140019845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019845 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he was not absent without leave (AWOL) from 25 February through 8 March 1971.

2.  The applicant states he came home from the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on a 30-day leave.  His mother got sick and went into the hospital.  He got a 15-day extension of leave from the Red Cross.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 4 March 1969, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He was trained as a radio relay and carrier attendant.
3.  On or about 26 September 1969, the applicant departed the United States for duty in the RVN.

4.  On 17 December 1969, the applicant was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  On 18 December 1969, he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 3 years.

5.  On 22 March 1971, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being AWOL from 25 February through 8 March 1971 (12 days).  He did not appeal the punishment.

6.  Unit Orders Number 28, 23rd Infantry Division, dated 25 March 1971, announced the applicant's forfeiture of pay resulting from his NJP as discussed in the preceding paragraph.

7.  The applicant departed the RVN in a casual leave status en route to Fort Hood, TX.

8.  On 2 May 1973, the applicant was discharged from the RA.  His DD Form 214 shows he had a non-pay period from 25 February through 8 March 1971.

9.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in block 44 (Time Lost) that he was AWOL from 25 February through 8 March 1971.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as then in effect, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the 
DD Form 214.  It required entry of non-pay periods for time lost.

11.  The legal "Doctrine of Laches" bars a claimant from receiving relief where the claimant's delay in pursuing the claim has operated to the prejudice of the opposing party.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by showing he was not AWOL from 25 February through 8 March 1971 because he had received a 15-day extension of his leave from the Red Cross.

2.  A review of the applicant's military records failed to reveal any documentation showing he had been authorized leave during the 12-day period in question. However, there is documentation of his acceptance of NJP for being AWOL during the questionable period and for his subsequent forfeiture of pay resulting from his absence.

3.  It has been more than 44 years since the subject period of AWOL.  Due to the passage of time pertinent information concerning approval of a leave extension that might have been in his military record has been lost or destroyed.  Therefore, favorable consideration of the applicant's request is barred by the "Doctrine of Laches."

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019845



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019845



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002820

    Original file (20110002820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows he was promoted to SP4 on 6 December 1968, the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty and he held this rank until he was reduced to PFC for misconduct on 22 August 1969. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant was granted de facto status during the period he erroneously held the rank of SGT from 5 November 1970 to 22 November 1972. Based on the applicant's erroneous promotion to SGT and lacking evidence to corroborate the applicant's claim he did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030195

    Original file (20100030195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states that when he left West Germany, he signed papers reporting his poor pay and was told to get on the jet and that his pay would be straightened out at Fort Dix, New Jersey. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100030195 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001489

    Original file (20140001489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided any evidence showing that he did not received all the pay to which he was entitled while he was in the Army. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009617C071029

    Original file (20060009617C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documents related to the applicant's request for discharge, for the good of the service – in lieu of court-martial, are not available in his service personnel record. AR 635-200, chapter 5, provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5, paragraph 5-9, specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for induction or initial enlistment will be discharged when a medical board,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007884

    Original file (20110007884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was considered and selected for promotion to the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 with retroactive retirement in that grade. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was considered and selected for promotion to SFC/E-7 and to retroactively retire him in that grade because his diploma for completion of BNCOC was not filed in his OMPF. The available evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000776

    Original file (20080000776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record confirms that prior to his record of AWOL-related misconduct,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014040

    Original file (20130014040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130014040 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant (E-5) instead of specialist four (E-4). The available evidence shows that the applicant was notified on 15 April 1970 of his selection for promotion to sergeant, pay grade E-5 and his subsequent assignment to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015520C071029

    Original file (20060015520C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) and number as “Rifleman 745” and to delete the reference to nine days of lost time from item 55 (Remarks). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007253

    Original file (20130007253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 December 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130007253 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He went to the RVN and asked again. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the final discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010016

    Original file (20110010016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be adjusted to 13 May 1968 from 1 March 1969. A letter from the DA Office of Personnel Operations, Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, dated 13 April 1970, shows he was promoted to the rank of CPT effective 1 March 1969. The applicant stated both letters are on file at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC).