Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000459
Original file (20120000459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000459 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her uncharacterized discharges of 1990 and 2002 to honorable discharges.

2.  The applicant states she believes her discharge was general and would like an honorable discharge.  She is suffering from chronic debilitating pain due to her service in the Army National Guard (ARNG).  She is requesting medical care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

3.  The applicant provides copies of her 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), three 2011 medical documents, and a letter from the Social Security Administration.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 27 January 1989 and was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) phase I on 7 June 1989.  She completed basic training on 10 August 1989 and was released to her ARNG unit.  No DD Form 214 was issued at this time.

3.  She was ordered to IADT phase II to complete her military occupational specialty (MOS) training on 28 February 1990.

4. On 8 March 1990, she was reported as absent without leave.  The date of her return to military control is not shown in the available records.

5.  Her DD Form 214 for the period ending 27 March 1990 shows she was released from IADT without completion of her MOS training.  Her service is shown as uncharacterized for this period of active duty.

6.  A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows she was released from the ARNG with uncharacterized service on 28 March 1990 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) for the remainder of her statutory obligation.

7.  On 8 August 1991, she was discharged from the USAR in an entry-level status due to unsatisfactory participation.

8.  There is no evidence of record to show the applicant had any subsequent service.

9.  The applicant's service medical records do not show any illnesses or injuries while serving on active duty.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the policies and procedures for enlisted personnel separations.

	a.  An honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	b.  A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

	c.  An uncharacterized separation will be initiated when a Soldier is released from IADT without completion of MOS training or discharged in an entry-level status.

	d.  For ARNG and USAR Soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option, it terminates 90 days after beginning phase II.  Soldiers completing phase I or basic combat training remain in an entry-level status until 90 days after beginning phase II.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty for training only.  She did not complete MOS training and, as such, her service is recorded as uncharacterized.

2.  There is no evidence of record and she provided none to show she had service after 1990 that culminated in a 2002 discharge.

3.  Based on the above facts, no relief is warranted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000459



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000459



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002449C071029

    Original file (20070002449C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed BCT on 21 July 1989, and did not enter active duty to complete AIT until 2 July 1990. Given the applicant was separated prior to completing 90 days of active duty service during her AIT phase of training, her service was properly described as uncharacterized in accordance with the applicable regulation. Therefore, the time for her file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 5 September 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090927C070212

    Original file (2003090927C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) for the period 14 August 1989 to 16 December 1989 be corrected to show her character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized. The applicant provides: On 6 May 1994, the State of North Carolina issued the applicant an Order and Certificate of Name Change which ordered the change of her last name from Cxxxer to Pxxxxll.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006003

    Original file (20090006003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090006003 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his period of initial active duty for training (IADT) be characterized to show he was honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides the following: a. only an honorable characterization of service may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his period of enlistment or period for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008030

    Original file (20090008030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); Headquarters, 2nd Troop, 104th Aviation Battalion, Annville, PA, memorandum, dated 9 December 1995; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military Affairs, The Adjutant General, Annville, PA, Orders 025-012, dated 6 February 1996; NGB Form 22 (Report of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001831

    Original file (20140001831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the characterization of her service from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 23 March 1989 * Letter from the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) * Certificate of training * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 24 March 2004 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 20 September 2013, she petitioned the ADRB for a change to her characterization of service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011605

    Original file (20130011605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated the service of Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and USAR Soldiers who successfully completed a period of initial active duty for training (IADT) who were in an entry-level status would be uncharacterized, even though they completed their IADT successfully. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she completed a total of 8 months and 22 days of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.