Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001831
Original file (20140001831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  25 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001831 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the characterization of her service from uncharacterized to honorable. 

2.  The applicant states she has put time and effort and she deserves compensation for the time she served with the military.   She was a dedicated Soldier but once she was discharged, she was unable to receive any type of help.  She never had a problem doing what was asked of her. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 23 March 1989
* Letter from the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB)
* Certificate of training
* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 24 March 2004

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR for 8 years on 24 August 1988.

3.  She entered active duty for training (ADT) on 26 October 1988.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training, and she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 72E (Tactical Telecommunications Center Operator).

4.  She was released from ADT to the control of the USAR on 23 March 1989.  She completed 4 months and 28 days of active service.  Her DD Form 214 shows in item 24 (Character of Service) the entry "UNCHARACTERIZED"

5.  Subsequent to her release from active duty, she was assigned to a troop program unit (TPU) of the USAR.  She reenlisted in the USAR for 6 years on 12 June 1994.  She also executed a 12-month extension on 11 September 2002. 

6.  On 24 March 2004, Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, published Orders 04-084-00070 honorably discharging her from the USAR effective 24 March 2004.

7.  On 20 September 2013, she petitioned the ADRB for a change to her characterization of service from uncharacterized to honorable.  However, the ADRB informed her that her request was not submitted within that board's         15-year statute of limitations and thus the ADRB could not act on it. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) describes the different types of characterization of service.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 describes the different types of characterization of service.  Paragraph 3-9 (Uncharacterized Separation) of the version in effect at the time stated a separation will be described as an entry level separation with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry level status, except in the following circumstances:

	a.  When characterization Under Other Than Honorable Conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case.

	b.  The Secretary of the Army, on a case–by–case basis, determines that characterization of service as Honorable is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty.  This characterization is authorized when the Soldier is separated by reason of selected changes in service obligation, convenience of the Government and Secretarial plenary authority.

	c.  For Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR Soldiers, entry level status begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR.  It terminates:

* For Soldiers ordered to ADT for continuous period—180 days after beginning training
* For Soldiers ordered to ADT for the split or alternate training option—90 days after beginning Phase II (AIT); Soldiers completing Phase I (Basic Training or Basic Combat Training) remain in entry level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 24 August 1988.  She entered ADT on 26 October 1988 and she was released from ADT on 23 March 1989.  She completed 4 months and 28 days of active service.  

2.  During the first 180 days of continuous active military service, a member's service is under review.  When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other-than-honorable conditions discharge.  An honorable characterization may be given only if the service clearly warrants that characterization by unusual circumstances of personal conduct and performance of military duty and is approved by the Secretary of the Army.  

3.  The entry-level (uncharacterized) separation is given regardless of the reason for separation. This uncharacterized discharge is neither positive nor negative; it is not "derogatory."  An uncharacterized character of service is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.  As a result, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for an honorable discharge.

4.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It is the period she spent on active duty that is being uncharacterized, not her discharge from the USAR.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.




ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001831





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001831



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003360

    Original file (AR20130003360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level status was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with character of service described as uncharacterized. However, the characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation is normally honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072241C070403

    Original file (2002072241C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It appears the applicant may have been ordered to initial ADT for the split training option, in which case she would have been considered an entry-level soldier until 90 days after beginning AIT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010359

    Original file (20130010359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release from ADT shows he completed 2 months and 23 days of active service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003710

    Original file (20120003710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show, at a minimum, that his service was under honorable conditions. The applicant states he completed active duty for training (ADT) without incident; however, item 24 (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 was recorded as "uncharacterized." A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered IADT on 8 September 1988 and he was released from ADT on 10 February 1989 under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Entry-level status for such a member of an RC terminates as follows: (1) 180 days after beginning training if the member is ordered to active duty for training (ADT) for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or (b) 90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the member is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070013838 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. She entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 14 October 1988 and was relieved from IADT on 4 March 1989 after completing 4 months and 21 days of active service. Department of Defense Directive 1332.14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002209

    Original file (20140002209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the characterization of his service from uncharacterized to honorable. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows in item 24 (Character of Service) the entry "UNCHARACTERIZED." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.