Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110021810
Original file (AR20110021810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/10/28	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she requests an upgrade of her discharge to fully honorable.  The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 110225
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110317   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: E Co, 123rd Bde Spt Bn, Fort Bliss, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL for 3 days (100615-100617), mode of return unknown.   

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): wrongfully used marijuana; reduction to E-1,  forfeiture of $723 pay x 2 months (suspended), extra duty for 45 days and restriction for 45 days, (FG).  However, this Article 15 is not contained in the available records, see unit commanders recommendation memorandum.

without authority, absented herself from her unit (AWOL); reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $378 pay (suspended), extra duty for 14 days and restriction for 14 days, (CG).  However, this Article 15 is not contained in the available records, see unit commanders recommendation memorandum.

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 071120    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	03  Yrs, 03  Mos, 25  Days ?????
Total Service:  		03  Yrs, 03  Mos, 25  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10 Automated Logistical Spec   GT: 92   EDU: 11 Years   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (090505-100425)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ICM-W/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:   
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 25 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using marijuana, being AWOL and failing to report to her appointed place of duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  She was advised of her rights. 
        
       On 28 February 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 8 March 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of her service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
       
       The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.   
       
VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 May 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, dated (111024); and a DD Form 214, dated (110317).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.







        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????


























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110021810
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016432

    Original file (AR20110016432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used methamphetamine and possessed syringes; in addition, he had several failure to repairs. On 23 May 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019660

    Original file (AR20110019660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for testing positive for an illegal substance (110104), with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. On 21 March 2011, the separation authority waived further...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110020935

    Original file (AR20110020935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023435

    Original file (AR20110023435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004447

    Original file (AR20110004447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 24 February 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008572

    Original file (AR20120008572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 9 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the applicant’s available military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120004312

    Original file (AR20120004312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that his Purple Heart award is not listed on his DD Form 214 and that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to honorable in order to use his educational benefits. On 19 December 2011, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003149

    Original file (AR20120003149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 16 August 2011, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst noted the applicant's issue of changing the narrative reason for her separation and reentry eligibility (RE) code.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019432

    Original file (AR20110019432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004376

    Original file (AR20110004376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 October 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that she wrongfully used an illegal drug, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 3 March 2011 and a copy of her Bachelor...