BOARD DATE: 7 June 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110024808
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests to be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for his service in Vietnam.
2. The applicant states he was told upon his departure from Vietnam that he was due a BSM, but he never received it and he desires to have it awarded if it is due to him.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Montgomery, Alabama, on 2 October 1967 for a period of 3 years and training as a microwave radio equipment repairman. He completed basic training at Fort Benning, Georgia, and advanced individual training at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, before being transferred to Vietnam on 13 October 1968.
3. He was initially assigned to the Long Lines Battalion-South and then to Company B, 369th Signal Battalion. He departed Vietnam on 5 October 1969 and was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona.
4. He served 2 months in Alaska on temporary duty and then returned to Fort Huachuca where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty on 1 October 1970 due to the expiration of his term of service. He completed 3 years of active service and his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
5. A review of his official records failed to show any evidence the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM for his service in Vietnam.
6. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant the BSM or any other awards.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there is no automatic entitlement to an award upon departure from an assignment or from the service.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service not involving participation in aerial flight in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
9. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130, provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion. Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.
10. The request, along with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to the Secretary of the Army at the following agency: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN: AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. The applicant's unit must be clearly identified along with the period of assignment and the award being recommended. A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638. Requests for consideration of awards should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents. Corroborating evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to the request. The burden and costs for researching and assembling documentation to support approval of requested awards and decorations rest with the requestor.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was told he was due an award of the BSM is not in doubt, the applicant's official records do not contain and the applicant has not provided any evidence to support his contention.
2. The passage of 40+ years since the applicant served in Vietnam makes it difficult at best to determine what happened in his case; however, without sufficient evidence to show he was recommended for award of the BSM and that it was lost or not processed to completion, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for award of the BSM at this time.
3. Additionally, there is no entitlement to award of the BSM and there is insufficient evidence to establish the basis for which he would have been recommended.
4. In the absence of sufficient evidence to show he was recommended for award of the BSM, there appears to be no basis to award it to him at this time.
5. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the BSM, this in no way affects the applicant's right to pursue his claim for the BSM by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x___ __x______ __x______ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States during the Vietnam War. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
_________x________________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110024808
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110024808
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006904
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) (2nd Award) with "V" Device. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the BSM for heroism, this in no way affects his/ right to pursue his claim for award of the BSM with "V" Device by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021506
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and evidence submitted with his application that he was in fact recommended for or awarded the BSM. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013771
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the BSM and his official military records do not contain any general orders that awarded him the BSM.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016624
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence suggesting his award of the BSM for meritorious service should be changed to an award for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021028
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A review of his official records failed to reveal any evidence to show that he was recommended for an award of the BSM during his first tour in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002930
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the BSM as an authorized award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015868
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Although the news articles and FSM's letter that were provided by the applicant indicate the FSM was awarded the BSM and ARCOM, there is no information, orders or other documents, in the FSM's record showing he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM and BSM by proper authority during his active duty tenure. While there is insufficient documentation and evidence for awarding the FSM the BSM and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008400
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was awarded the BSM. Based on these records, it appears the approval authority determined the ARCOM was the appropriate award for his service and downgraded the BSM recommendation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021045
Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. The applicant's requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the BSM and the SS was carefully considered and there is sufficient evidence to grant partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011172
The applicant requests: a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show award of the CIB and BSM. The evidence of record does not show the applicant was...