Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016624
Original file (20130016624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016624 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Air Medal with two oak leaf clusters.

2.  The applicant states his awards of the BSM and Air Medal with two oak leaf clusters were left off his DD Form 214.  His award of the BSM for meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces should be upgraded to an award for valor.  He did not receive his medals because he was unable to attend the ceremony and desires to receive them.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his awards of the BSM and Air Medals.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 April 1965 for a period of 3 years and training as a helicopter mechanic.  He completed basic training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and advanced individual training at Fort Rucker, Alabama, before being transferred to Vietnam on 21 October 1965 for assignment to the 571st Transportation Detachment.

3.  General Orders Number 1177 issued by Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, on 26 November 1966 awarded the applicant the Air Medal with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster.

4.  General Orders Number 1780 issued by Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, on 19 December 1966 awarded the applicant the BSM for meritorious service.

5.  He participated in three campaigns while serving in Vietnam.  He departed Vietnam on 19 October 1966 and was transferred to Fort Eustis, Virginia, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 11 April 1968 due to the expiration of term of service.  He completed 3 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Aircraft Crewman Badge, and Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence suggesting his award of the BSM for meritorious service should be changed to an award for valor.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be worn on the appropriate service medal based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B, including the Vietnam Service Medal.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows his unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period the applicant served with the unit.

9.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, 


the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.

10.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander,  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded the BSM and Air Medal with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster and is entitled to have those awards added to his DD Form 214.

2.  Additionally, he participated in three campaigns and is authorized to wear three bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and to have them added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant's unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit; therefore, he is entitled to have that unit award added to his DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant's contention that his award of the BSM for meritorious service should be changed to an award for valor was considered.  However, he failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application a basis to support such a change.  Accordingly, there is insufficient evidence to grant that portion of his request.

5.  While the available evidence is insufficient for upgrading the applicant’s BSM for meritorious service to a BSM with a “V” device for valor, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the upgrade by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214
* adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 and issuing them to him –

* BSM
* Air Medal (3rd Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his BSM for service to an award for valor.

3.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016624



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016624



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008189

    Original file (20100008189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommendation for decoration, dated 4 December 1970, shows the applicant was recommended for the award of the BSM from 26 March 1970 to 12 December 1970. The orders show the ARCOM (First Oak Leaf Cluster) was awarded for meritorious service during the period March 1970 to December 1970, the same period cited on the applicant's recommendation for the award of the BSM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008289

    Original file (20080008289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB); Bronze Star Medal (BSM), 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award); and all other unit awards to which he is entitled be added to Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014380

    Original file (20070014380.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's MPRJ contains no orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for, or awarded a second award of the ARCOM or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM with “V” Device. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. It confirms that during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, the applicant’s unit (Co C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry Regiment) earned the RVN Gallantry Cross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019345

    Original file (20110019345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, his unit, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, was cited for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 July-13 November 1968 by Department of the Army GO (DAGO) 31, dated 1969 and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 19 December 1968-28 June 1969 by DAGO 43, dated 1970. In this case, the evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was assigned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011599

    Original file (20080011599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his separation document, DD Form 214, be amended to add the Air Medal (AM) for Valor, the second and third award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for Valor (BSM for Valor with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters), a Purple Heart, and any other awards he may be entitled to receive. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the BSM. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010997

    Original file (20090010997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214, effective 6 January 1967, does not show awards of the Bronze Star Medal, two Army Commendation Medals, or the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal or any Army Commendation Medals. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000956

    Original file (20150000956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 1987 to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1987 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting award of the VSM from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1987...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000643

    Original file (20080000643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that Special Orders awarded the applicant the Joint Service Commendation Medal with “V” Device for exceptionally valorous service in the performance of duties on 15 December 1973. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Legion of Merit, Air Medal with “V” Device (2nd Award),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057991C070420

    Original file (2001057991C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It instructed that all deserving individuals who had served honorably while a member of the 1 st Air Cavalry Division and are nearing the end of their Vietnam tour should be considered for a service award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant served during five campaigns during his assignments in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of five bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. a. showing that the individual concerned was awarded the BSM for...