Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013771
Original file (20130013771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  18 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013771 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states he was notified by his unit personnel department that he had received the BSM and that the medal was being sent to his unit.  Since he was due to depart the Republic of Vietnam he was given the option of staying with his unit and waiting for the medal to arrive or to leave the country.  He chose not to wait for the medal.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 December 1966.  His record shows he served in Vietnam from 13 November 1967 to 24 July 1969.

3.  On 25 July 1969, he was honorably released from active duty by reason of early separation as an overseas returnee.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the BSM.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the BSM and his official military records do not contain any general orders that awarded him the BSM.  

5.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between    1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the BSM pertaining to the applicant.

6.  U. S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  It stated the BSM may have been awarded for heroism or for meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations.  The approval authority for award of the BSM was generally delegated no lower than brigadier generals in command of separate brigades.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

7.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.

8.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's honorable service and the sincerity of his request are not in question.  However, in the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the BSM.

2.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant a BSM, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the BSM by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013771



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013771



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021045

    Original file (20090021045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. The applicant's requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the BSM and the SS was carefully considered and there is sufficient evidence to grant partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006666

    Original file (20110006666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). With respect to the BSM, based upon his application, the evidence of record, and accompanying supporting documents he has submitted, it does not appear that the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM. In order to request an award under 10 USC 1130, he must submit a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021506

    Original file (20110021506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and evidence submitted with his application that he was in fact recommended for or awarded the BSM. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018512

    Original file (20090018512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a self-authored statement in which he claims on or about 18 March 1968, while serving in the RVN as an artillery mechanic, his unit came under a heavy mortar attack and one of their guns was hit and two tracks had to be replaced. The applicant is advised that while there is not sufficient evidence for the award of the BSM, this does not preclude him from pursuing award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005916

    Original file (20130005916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB or BSM as authorized awards. There are no orders for the CIB or BSM in the available records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011172

    Original file (20100011172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show award of the CIB and BSM. The evidence of record does not show the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015868

    Original file (20090015868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Although the news articles and FSM's letter that were provided by the applicant indicate the FSM was awarded the BSM and ARCOM, there is no information, orders or other documents, in the FSM's record showing he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM and BSM by proper authority during his active duty tenure. While there is insufficient documentation and evidence for awarding the FSM the BSM and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000093

    Original file (20100000093.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the PH in official orders by the appropriate award authority. The available evidence shows the applicant was recommended for award of the BSM as evident by the DA Form 137 on file in his MPRJ.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001356

    Original file (20140001356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, his service record does not include any recommendations or orders for award of the ARCOM and BSM. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant an ARCOM and BSM, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the ARCOM and BSM by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016624

    Original file (20130016624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence suggesting his award of the BSM for meritorious service should be changed to an award for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form...