Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022933
Original file (20110022933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022933 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he should have received it for the same incident as two other Soldiers.  He relates:

   a.  When a grenade was thrown at their vehicle, two other Soldiers were awarded the CIB.  However, he was told he wouldn't get it because he had a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for disobeying a direct order by listening to an iPod while on a mission.  He was unjustly punished, his platoon leader and other Soldiers frequently listened to their iPODS while on mission.

   b.  After the tour in Iraq, the first sergeant told him he would receive the CIB if he reached fitness standards and passed the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT).  He did this but still didn't receive the CIB.

   c.  He wasn't advised of the status of his CIB.  He was kept in the dark.  He was denied the award prior to disciplinary actions.  He would have been the only African American to receive the CIB for that deployment.  He thinks those in leadership positions were biased in their judgment of him.  



3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty)
* correspondence to and from two United States Senators
* a partial list of telephone contacts for the 3rd Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division
* a hand-printed statement from a fellow former Soldier and a typed sworn statement from the same individual

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 October 2007 and completed training as an infantryman.   

2.  His tour of duty in Iraq from 3 September 2008 to 24 August 2009
included:

* 11 November 2008 – NJP for negligent discharge of his rifle in the guard tower
* 1 March 2009 – advancement to pay grade E-2
* 28 May 2009 – NJP for willful disobedience of a lawful order not to use electronic devices on security duty 

3.  On 31 August 2009, the date of his last physical, he was 6 feet tall and weighed 270 pounds.  The weight for height table in Army Regulation 600-9 (Army Weight Control Program) shows that the maximum weight for a 6 foot male between ages 21 and 27 years is 195 pounds.

4.  He received another NJP for using marijuana between 19 November and 18 December 2009.

5.  A routine cleanliness inspection of living spaces, on 22 February 2010, revealed marijuana. The applicant provided a sworn statement to the effect that he assumed full responsibility for the "stem" and "roach" but didn't know how they got there or who might have brought them into his room.

6.  A DA Form 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Action (Flag) was filed  (for elimination).  A subsequent counseling statement noted that he had tested positive for marijuana on 23 February 2010.

7.  The applicant was processed for elimination due to a pattern of misconduct and separated with a general discharge, on 1 November 2010.
8.  The statements from the other Soldier that the applicant submitted with his application essentially duplicate the applicant's version of events.  The witness related that he served in Iraq with the applicant and that the applicant told him that he didn't get the CIB because he was flagged due to physical training and disciplinary action.  He also relates that the applicant reported to him that all of the conditions the command had specified had been satisfied, but the CIB was still withheld. 

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the Combat Infantryman Badge may be  awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties (emphasis added), assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  None of the details that the applicant and his supporter relate are contained in the available records (except that he was overweight, had committed some misconduct, and had been flagged). 

2.  However, it is appears that he was not serving satisfactorily and therefore does not appear to be eligible for the CIB.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




   ________ __x_____________
            CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022933



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                                           1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022933



                                                             2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010361

    Original file (20100010361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 16 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010361 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * his DD From 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * orders announcing award of the CAB * his Army Achievement Medal award * memorandum showing award of the Iraq Campaign Medal * a photograph of his unit's flag * 4 pages from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) * 2 sworn statements * his California State Inspector General (IG) Action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017800

    Original file (20110017800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The evidence clearly shows the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011838

    Original file (20080011838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on 2 December 1987. However, there is no evidence the applicant was recommended for an award based on this incident. There is no evidence to show why the applicant was not promoted from the promotion list dated 30 January 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009912

    Original file (20080009912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 May 2003, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Noble Eagle, in MOS 11B. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). However, the evidence of record shows that he was assigned or attached to a Military Police unit during his service in Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007030

    Original file (20080007030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) instead of the Combat Action Badge (CAB) and that he contributed to the MGIB. Upon confirmation from their chain that the enemy was setting up a mortar system for an indirect fire attack, he and the other two Soldiers fired an initial volley of three high-explosive (HE) rounds. Furthermore, the applicant evidence of record shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and engaged the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010980

    Original file (20090010980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his request: a. an undated self-authored statement; b. copies of Orders R-01-680158, R-04-781930, and R-01-680158A1, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC), St. Louis, MO, on 10 January 2006, 3 April 2007, and 10 February 2009, respectively; c. a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 11 March 2009; d. copies of his DA Forms 2166-8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015458

    Original file (20140015458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he was relieved from duty, on 16 February 1968, while at Firebase Bravo, Camp Enari, Pleiku, Vietnam * he was flown to Cam Rahn Bay Air Base for his flight back to the United States, on 17 February 1968 * he was flown to Fort Lewis, WA, to begin his out-processing * he was issued a new dress uniform, complete with ribbons, patches, and Blackhawk insignias already on his uniform * his original DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019134

    Original file (20090019134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for his service in Iraq. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 8-6, provides for award of the CIB. Although the evidence of record shows he served as an infantryman during his assignment in Iraq, there is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence which shows he was assigned to an infantry unit that was engaged in active ground combat or that he was personally...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011505

    Original file (20140011505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011505 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A search of records of the names provided by the platoon sergeant indicates that at least seven of the members of the patrol received either the CIB or the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) for the 10 December 2006 engagement. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001181

    Original file (20150001181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The effective date of the flag is the date the Soldier was found to be in noncompliance with Army Regulation 600-9 (The AWCP). b. Paragraph 3-2b states that Soldiers not meeting body fat standards after 1 year from the date of entry into the active Army will be entered in the AWCP and flagged under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-2 by the unit commander. The evidence of record shows on 3 September 2004, the commander disapproved the applicant's award of the AGCM for the period 9...