Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017800
Original file (20110017800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  3 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017800 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was involved in an improvised explosive device (IED) attack while in Iraq.  He contends the paperwork for his award of the CIB was still being processed when his unit left Iraq.  Two years have passed and he has not heard anything more about his CIB.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 26 April 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 16 August 2008, the applicant, a California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Soldier in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4, was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).

2.  Having completed his required active service, on 3 October 2009, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the control of the CAARNG.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in:

	a.  Item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) the entry Company B (-), 1st Battalion, 185th Armored Battalion, Forces Command;

	b.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) the entry 11B1O Infantryman; and

	c.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the no entry for the CIB.

3.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22E (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 23 September 2010, shows:

	a.  the applicant completed his active Guard commitment and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation; and

	b.  his awards listed on the form do not include the CIB.

4.  The applicant's sworn statement, dated 26 April 2009, shows he was assigned to the Company B, 1st/185th Combined Arms Battalion (CAB), while stationed in Iraq.  He essentially states he was in the second military vehicle of a convoy in Iraq when the first vehicle, that was about 100 meters ahead, struck an IED.  After the explosion, the applicant's vehicle moved ahead about 500 meters where he and the other Soldiers in the vehicle established security and performed self-checks and function checks of sensitive items.  They remained on site until the explosive ordnance disposal team completed a search of the immediate area for secondary IEDs and performed a crater analysis.  They were then cleared to continue their convoy mission.  The sworn statement was witnessed by two members of his unit and sworn to by his unit commander on 15 July 2009.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and procedures concerning awards.  It states that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB:

	a.  the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties,

	b.  he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and

	c.  he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the CIB based on his involvement in an IED attack in Iraq.



2.  The evidence clearly shows the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS. However, there is no evidence to show he was in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat.  There is also no evidence he was recommended for award of the CIB by his chain of command.

3.  The applicant's statement clearly shows he was in a vehicle convoy involved with establishing security in an area where another Soldier's vehicle was struck by an IED.  However, the circumstances described in the statement do not clearly support he had engaged in active ground combat with the enemy in such a way as to qualify for award of the CIB.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017800



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017800



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030071

    Original file (20100030071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) in lieu of the Combat Action Badge (CAB). The applicant states he served as an infantryman in Iraq and he received the CAB for being engaged by the enemy during Operation Iraqi Freedom. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Permanent Order 211-017, dated 29 July 2009, awarding the applicant the CAB; b. awarding the applicant the CIB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000088

    Original file (20110000088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Combat Action Badge (CAB) for his service in Iraq. The convoy manifest, dated 7 November 2007, and an attached convoy order as provided by the applicant, indicates the applicant was traveling in a convoy when a gun truck hit an IED which exploded. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show award of the CAB for his service in Iraq because he was engaged by the enemy while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018091

    Original file (20110018091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 November 2008 he was ordered to active duty as a field artillery CPT and he served until he was REFRAD on 23 November 2010. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. Based on the evidence submitted with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010361

    Original file (20100010361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 16 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010361 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * his DD From 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * orders announcing award of the CAB * his Army Achievement Medal award * memorandum showing award of the Iraq Campaign Medal * a photograph of his unit's flag * 4 pages from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) * 2 sworn statements * his California State Inspector General (IG) Action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009916

    Original file (20080009916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his commander was unfamiliar with the regulations regarding awarding the CIB and, therefore, did not submit the applicant for the award. The applicant also states, in effect, that he was engaged by enemy fire, both direct and indirect, while performing combat duties in Iraq. Item 13 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009911

    Original file (20080009911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states his unit was unfamiliar with regulations and did not submit a recommendation for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010541

    Original file (20130010541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command's (HRC) decision denying him award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a personal appearance before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The evidence shows his dismounted unit received six mortar rounds 75-100 meters from their position. By all accounts, there is insufficient evidence the applicant and his unit actually engaged the enemy in combat fire.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009913

    Original file (20080009913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). On 3 October 2007, he was released from active duty upon completion of his required active service and returned to his unit in the CAARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029338

    Original file (20100029338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * Four non-sequential pages extracted from FM 3-21.10 * Six pages extracted from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) pertaining to the eligibility criteria for award of the CIB * Citation and certificate for the Bronze Star Medal * Email correspondence exchanged between himself and staff members of the National Guard Bureau * His CIB Recommendation Packet consisting of: * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) * Mobilization orders * Deployment orders * Battalion commander's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012519

    Original file (20130012519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his statement of the incident of 29 September 2011 * his statement of the incident of 7 October 2011 * email endorsement from LTC K, dated 4 June 2012 * Commander's Recommended Approval, DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 20 June 2012 * Sworn statements from MAJ FDR, Chief Warrant Officer Two P, Sergeant (SGT) V, SGT F, SGT W, and SGT C * two Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) * Officer Record Brief (ORB) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. When the applicant provided...