Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019134
Original file (20090019134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019134 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for his service in Iraq.

2.  The applicant states:

* he should be awarded these awards for his service in Iraq
* while in Iraq he was involved in different patrols in which his vehicle came under fire and in one particular patrol he lost a close friend
* a lot of the unit records were lost 
* he did see his name on the orders when he left Iraq but the orders did not make it back to the states
* he moved around to various units in Iraq 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 2007.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 11B (infantryman).  He served in Iraq from 1 February 2008 to 19 July 2008.  On 15 September 2009, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph
14-12c (Commission of a serious offense), by reason of misconduct.

2.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show the CIB or the ARCOM as authorized awards.

3.  There are no orders for the CIB or the ARCOM in the available records.

4.  Section VII (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant's ERB does not show entitlement to the CIB or the ARCOM.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 8-6, provides for award of the CIB.  That paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130 provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

8.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to the Secretary of the Army at the following agency:  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Personnel Service Support Division, 200 Stovall Street, Room 3S67, Alexandria, VA  22332-0405.  The applicant's unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the award being recommended.  A narrative of the actions or 


period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 
638.  Requests for consideration of awards should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.
Corroborating evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling documentation to support approval of requested awards and decorations rest with the requestor.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders for the CIB in the applicant’s service personnel records.  Although the evidence of record shows he served as an infantryman during his assignment in Iraq, there is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence which shows he was assigned to an infantry unit that was engaged in active ground combat or that he was personally present and under hostile fire in Iraq.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB in this case.
 
2.  There are no orders for the ARCOM in the available records.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the ARCOM in this case.  While there is insufficient evidence for awarding the applicant the ARCOM, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the ARCOM by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019134



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019134



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007415

    Original file (20090007415.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his request. Without an award recommendation, there is insufficient documentation to base granting the applicant the ARCOM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016203C070206

    Original file (20050016203C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of two Army Commendation Medals (ARCOM), Combat Infantry Badge (CIB), and all medals and awards associated with deployment in support of Operation Desert Spring and Operation Iraqi Freedom. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant should be awarded the CIB. There is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any to show he served in support of specific operations that would qualify him for the award of the Kosovo...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000438

    Original file (20120000438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The corresponding citation states the ARCOM was issued by PO Number 265-004 on 24 September 2007 and reads: For exceptionally meritorious service while serving as an Anti-tank driver against enemy forces in the town of Kajaki Sofia, Afghanistan, during recovery operations of a downed aircraft, [applicant] displayed the ability to make sound and timely decisions in a high pressure situation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) – as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017011

    Original file (20110017011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 * U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Form 157 (Recommendation for Decoration for Valor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015003

    Original file (20060015003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the award of Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and any awards for his service in Iraq. Records show the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show in item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 "Service in Kuwait (Operation Desert Spring) From 20020519 – 20021202; and Service in Iraq...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027000

    Original file (20100027000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the CIB or BSM. The applicant's unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the award being recommended.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005065

    Original file (20070005065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM and the AAM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show in item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 Service in Iraq 20040110 – 20050112. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the awards of ARCOM, AAM, CIB, in item 12f (Foreign Service) the entry 0001 00 03, and in item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 Service in Iraq...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004292

    Original file (20070004292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requests correction to his DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). A computer generated Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) obtained from the applicant's Official Military Personnel File on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) does not show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Iraqi Campaign Medal, or the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020387

    Original file (20090020387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006726

    Original file (20090006726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The BSM and CIB are individual awards, not authorized unit awards. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.