Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022075
Original file (20110022075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022075 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 August 2006 to show:

* his rank and pay grade as "SPC" and "E4"
* his Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) Coverage as $400,000 instead of $300,000
* in item 11 (Primary Specialty), 5 years and 8 months
* deployed service of 13 months
* his mailing address after separation as: 9—Win--- Ct., Aurora, IL 60504  

2.  As a secondary issue, he requests an explanation as to why item 16 (Days Accrued Leave Paid) of his DD Form 214 shows he had no accrued leave for which he was being paid.

3.  He states he is not sure of the reason for the error. 

4.  He provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 August 2006. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He asks why item 16 of his DD Form 214 shows "0."  This information is provided by the local finance office.  The Board only corrects military records; since he has not asked for a correction to this item, this portion of his request will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

3.  On 10 March 2006, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

4.  On 20 March 2006, he entered active duty for training from his USAR unit for the purpose of completing initial active duty for training.  On 10 August 2006, he was awarded the military occupational specialty 21W (Carpentry/Masonry Specialist) and released from active duty for training and returned to his USAR unit.

5.  His DD Form 214 in question shows:

   a.  his rank and pay grade as "PV1" and "E01"
   
   b.  SGLI coverage of $300,000;
   
   c.  he served 0 years and 0 months in his primary specialty; 
   
   d.  he served 4 months and 21 days net active service this period; 
   
   e.  no deployed/mobilized service; 
   
   f.  his mailing address after separation as:  464 T---- C-- , Au----, IL 60505.  Item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) of this form shows he certified the entries on this document were correct with his signature.

6.  His records maintained in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System contain:

	a.  Orders 188-671 showing, on 7 July 2006, that his rank was "PV1";

	b.  Orders 09-295-00103, dated 22 October 2009, ordering him to active duty, on 14 January 2010, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; and 
	c.  a DD Form 214 showing that he entered active duty from his USAR unit on 14 January 2010 and was released from active duty on 28 February 2011.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. 

	a.  It states for item 11 of the DD Form 214 to enter the titles of all military occupational specialties served for at least 1 year and include for each military occupational specialty the number of years and months served.  For time determination, 16 days or more count as a month.  Do not count basic training and advanced individual training.

	b.  It states for item 19a of the DD Form 214 that the entry will be provided by the Soldier.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The DD Form 214 provided by the applicant covers his period of initial active duty for training ending on 10 August 2006.

   a.  He has provided no evidence to show the rank, pay grade, and SGLI coverage on the DD Form 214 he provided were incorrect when this form was completed.
   
   b.  At that time this form was completed he had not served any time in his primary specialty.  As such, there is no error in this entry.
   
   c.  He was ordered to active duty for deployment in 2010.  As such, this information would not be entered on his DD Form 214 for the period ending in 2006.
   
   d.  Regulatory policy prescribes that the Soldier will provide the mailing address after separation for entry in item 19a of their DD Form 214.  He certified with his signature that the DD Form 214 containing the current entry was correct.

2.  The ABCMR starts its consideration with a presumption of regularity, that what the Army did was correct.  The burden of proving otherwise is the
responsibility of the applicant.  It is presumed the entries shown on his DD Form 214 were administratively correct at the time the form was completed.  As such, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022075



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022075



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004289

    Original file (20110004289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As new issues, he requests an adjustment of his discharge date from 6 May to 27 October 2010 and correction of the following items on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) by showing in: * item 11 (Primary Specialty) – he served as a 31A (Military Police (MP)) 5 years and 5 months vice 5 years and 3 months * item 12a (Date Entered on Active Duty) – 7 June 2007 instead of 11 June 2007 * item 12b (Separation Date This Period) – "27 October 2010" instead of "6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009610

    Original file (20150009610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 5 June 2015, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied his request to change his RE code, characterization of service, and narrative reason for separation. On 3 April 2012, the applicant's immediate commander recommended his separation from active duty under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) by reason of inability to adjust to military service. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 6 April 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009923

    Original file (20080009923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 April 2008, he received a letter from HRC requesting payment for $1,144.00 in SGLI debt. In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); his reassignment orders; a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS); his 2006 and 2007 Account Statements; a letter from HRC, St. Louis; and email correspondence from a staff member with HRC, St. Louis. In a letter dated 24 April 2008, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016827

    Original file (20060016827.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the home of record (HOR) on his DD Form 214 with the period ending 7 November 2006 be corrected to show ____ ________ _______, McDonald, PA, 15057. Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) Orders M06-152-061, dated 1 June 2006, erroneously show the applicant's address in the standard name line as ____ ________ _______, Indiana, PA, 15705-0001 and his HOR as Indiana, PA, 15705-0001 (it should read ____ ________ _______, McDonald, PA, 15057). The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020167

    Original file (20090020167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of items 7b (Home of Record at Time of Entry), 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period), and 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 2009. Item 7b of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 September 2009 shows his home of record at the time of entry was "xxx D S------- St., Apt. Item 7b of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019494

    Original file (20130019494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the amount of Servicemen's Group Life Insurance (SGLI) coverage shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 20 June 2013 be changed to show $400,000.00. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate (SGLV 8286), dated 28 March 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation directed that the purpose of the separation document was to provide the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001730

    Original file (20120001730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty on 7 January 2005, she was honorably REFRAD on 6 February 2006 based on completion of required active service. The evidence of record also shows the applicant had continuous service as a member of the USAR from 31 January 2000 through the date she was REFRAD on 6 February 2006. b. Thus, records show the applicant's HOR was incorrectly recorded on her orders when she was ordered to active duty in support of OEF on 7 January 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009664

    Original file (20140009664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 September 2013 to show: * his place of entry into active duty as an address in Kentucky * his home of record (HOR) at the time of entry as an address in Kentucky * the station where he separated as Kaiserslautern Transition Center, Germany * award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) with bronze arrowhead device instead of the AFEM * award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021787

    Original file (20120021787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states the applicant is providing a new argument and new evidence that shows on 11 February 2009 the FSM made an election to increase his SGLI to full coverage. (2) For increasing the amount of SGLI coverage, if you have less than the maximum amount. a. Paragraph 12-19 states that to change a beneficiary, the Soldier must complete a new SGLV 8286. b. Paragraph 12-22 states when a Soldier who waived the right to be insured under SGLI or elected reduced insurance coverage now wants...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005121

    Original file (20110005121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no authority to change the HOR as officially recorded at the time of entry into military service. He has not provided documentation and his record contains no evidence to show his address was anything other than the Jeannette, PA address listed in his enlistment contract. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting items 7b and 19a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 July 2006 to show the entry “xxxx W. xxth Street,...