Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019255
Original file (20110019255.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019255 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show 1 year, 1 month, and 19 days.

2.  The applicant states:

* his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows 1 year and 19 days of foreign service
* he wants his DD Form 214 corrected before he dies

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* two letters from the Commanding General, 101st Airborne Division, APO San Francisco, dated 15 April 1968 and 13 October 1968

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 June 1966.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 62B (Engineer Equipment Repairman).  The highest rank/grade he attained while on active duty during this period of service was specialist five (SP5)/E-5.  

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following:

   a. Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows USARPAC (U.S. Army Pacific) Vietnam, 20 November 1967 through 8 January 1969.

   b. Item 38 (Record of Assignment) shows he was assigned to the Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 326th Engineer Battalion, 101st Airborne Division while in the Republic of Vietnam.

4.  Item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows 1 year and 19 days.

5.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and two letters from the Commanding General, 101st Airborne Division, APO San Francisco, dated 15 April 1968 and 13 October 1968.  The letters show the applicant's DEROS (date eligible to return from overseas) was adjusted from 19 November 1968 to 19 December 1968 and again from 19 December 1968 to 8 January 1969.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably separated on 8 January 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 2 years, 7 months, and 19 days of active service during this period.  On 1 April 1992, the applicant was placed on the Retired Reserve List.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his correct foreign service time was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  Evidence shows the applicant's DEROS from Vietnam was adjusted to 8 January 1969, an additional 30 days.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this additional foreign service time.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to show 1 year, 1 month, and 19 days.
 




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019255



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019255



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510919C070209

    Original file (9510919C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending on 29 March 1968. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), at item 31 (Foreign Service) indicates that he served in the U.S. Army, Pacific (USARPAC) from 17 April 1965 through 16 May 1966; that he served in the U.S. Army, Europe (USAREUR), from 22 June 1966 through 5 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016289

    Original file (20140016289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he completed 18 months of foreign service instead of 11 months and 29 days, as currently listed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Based upon orders and the entries on the applicant's DA Form 20, it is evident the number of months currently shown for foreign service on the applicant's DD Form 214 is incorrect. _______ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022907

    Original file (20110022907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show time served in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to add the entry, Vietnam and inclusive dates, to Item 30 of his DD Form 214. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005682

    Original file (20080005682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his overseas service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stipulated that overseas service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 would be entered in Item 22c, and that an entry documenting RVN service would be entered in Item 30. Although the specific date the applicant arrived in the RVN cannot...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007734

    Original file (20090007734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his foreign service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090007734 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013047

    Original file (20080013047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add all his medals and that his service dates be corrected at the same time. However, based on his service in Vietnam he is entitled to correction of Item 30 to show his inclusive period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Items...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015838

    Original file (20090015838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Although his inclusive dates of service in Vietnam are not available, his DD Form 214 shows he had 11 months and 28 days of foreign service. Therefore, item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served in Vietnam from 5 January 1968 to 3 January 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075427C070403

    Original file (2002075427C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His discharge document shows authorized awards for service in Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. b. by showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and the Good Conduct Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008745

    Original file (20080008745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding award of the Purple Heart with one oak leaf cluster; the Bronze Star Medal; the Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze Service Stars; the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018951

    Original file (20090018951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army General Orders 8, 1974, announced award of the RVN Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm for service in the RVN to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam (USARV) and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. Adding to his DD Form 214: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation *...