Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018065
Original file (20110018065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018065 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of captain (CPT) from 15 October to 9 September 2008.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to a CPT’s position on 9 September 2008; however, he was not promoted to the rank of CPT until 15 October 2008 because officials at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) did not see that he was in a CPT’s position until 15 October 2008.  He goes on to state that the difference of 37 days can cause him a 1-year delay in consideration for further promotion.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his transfer orders and a copy of the Unit Manning Report (UMR) showing the position is a CPT’s position.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was commissioned as an infantry second lieutenant (2LT) in the Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) 20 May 2002.  He was ordered to active duty on 18 May 2004, he was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT) on 19 May 2004, and he deployed to Egypt and Iraq.  He was released from active duty on 13 June 2006.

2.  On 24 August 2008, he was honorably discharged from the MAARNG and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).


3.  Orders C-09-816067, issued by USAHRC, St. Louis, MO, dated 9 September 2008, transferred the applicant to an infantry battalion in Ayer, MA.  The position number he was assigned to was a CPT position and the effective date was
9 September 2008.  The applicant was promoted to CPT on 15 October 2008.

4.  The applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from 1 July 2009 to 1 May 2010.

5.  In the processing of this case, on 30 December 2011, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the DA Promotions, Special Actions Branch, USAHRC, Fort Knox, KY.  The advisory official opined that the applicant was recommended for promotion on the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Reserve Component, Army Promotion List approved on 8 February 2008.  Inasmuch as an AHRC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement) was not received from his command, the applicant was promoted to CPT on 15 October 2008, the date he was assigned to the CPT position.  The advisory official also provides that in order to amend his DOR, the USAHRC requires an AHRC Form 56-R validated by the chain of command verifying that the applicant was assigned or matched against a CPT or higher graded position.  Officials at the USAHRC recommended denial of the applicant’s request.

6.  On 4 January 2012, the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant by email for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  On the same day the applicant responded to the effect that he had provided a copy of his transfer orders into a CPT’s billet and a copy of the UMR showing the position was a CPT’s position.  He further states he could have the unit verify that information, if needed.

7.  The UMR provided by the applicant, dated 9 August 2011, does not contain the applicant’s name.  However, the position in question is a CPT’s position.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14304 provides the legal authority for eligibility for consideration for promotion based on maximum years in grade (MYIG) as provided by law.  Paragraph (a) states that officers shall be placed in the promotion zone and shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title, far enough in advance of completing the MYIG so that if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer will complete those years of service.  If the officer occupies a position equal to or higher than the grade to which they are being promoted, they may be promoted before they reach their MYIG.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DOR for promotion to CPT should be adjusted from 15 October to 9 September 2008 has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The applicant was selected by a duly constituted promotion selection board and he was properly promoted to CPT effective the date he was assigned to a valid higher graded position.

3.  It is also noted that the advisory opinion clearly states the USAHRC can adjust his DOR if his unit provides the necessary documents (AHRC Form 56-R) verifying his contentions; however, the applicant has provided no indication that he has attempted to do so.

4.  In the absence of evidence to show that he was assigned to a valid CPT’s position prior to 15 October 2008, there appears to be an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant’s requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018065



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018065



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000933

    Original file (20120000933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * self-authored memorandum, dated 5 January 2012 * DA Form 2B (Personnel Qualification Record (PQR)), dated 23 January 2008 and 7 April 2011 * mobilization Orders A-03-007121, dated 9 March 2010 * DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report) for the period ending 4 November 2010 * mobilization Orders A-12-035136, dated 21 December 2010 * Unit Manning Reports (UMR), dated 7 April 2011, 8 November 2011, and 13 November 2012 * AHRC Forms 56-R, dated 8 April 2011, 8 and 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008556

    Original file (20080008556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his promotion orders (Orders B-01-800898, dated 31 January 2008) be amended to show his date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (LTC) as 21 December 2007 or the earliest possible date following the release of board results. The commanding officer stated the applicant was assigned to an LTC position as of 15 August 2007 and his promotion effective date should be 21 December 2007 (the approval date of the board). As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004180

    Original file (20130004180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of major (MAJ)/O-4 when he was selected by the Position Vacancy Board (PVB) in March 2009. The applicant provides: a. his Officer Record Brief (ORB) which shows he was assigned as the 157th Infantry Brigade Chaplain for the period 16 September 2008 through 26 June 2011; b. a DA Form 4935, dated 8 January 2009, which shows the commander of the 157th Infantry Brigade identified the brigade chaplain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013721

    Original file (20100013721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was in an O-5 slot from 9 June 2009 until 13 July 2009. He states he is being penalized for being involuntarily cross-leveled for deployment to Iraq, resulting in over 3 months of lost time in rank. Therefore, notwithstanding the advisory opinion received from HRC-St. Louis, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant's records to show he was promoted to lieutenant colonel with an effective date and DOR of 9 June 2009, with entitlement to back pay and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016946C070206

    Original file (20050016946C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 4-21 (Effective dates), provides, in pertinent part, for the promotion of unit officers and states that the effective date and date of promotion will be no earlier than the approval date of the board, the date of Senate confirmation (if required), or the date the officer is assigned to the position, whichever is later. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to LTC by the 2002 DA RC Selection Board, which was approved on 13 January 2003,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013046

    Original file (20110013046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 April 2011, such clarification was provided, showing the applicant was assigned to an LTC position effective 24 March 2011. d. The opinion further states that if the applicant can provide proof of assignment substantiated by the UMR and a new AHRC Form 56-R showing an earlier date of assignment to an LTC position he would be eligible to be promoted accordingly. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show his DOR for LTC as 3 January 2011 because he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008757

    Original file (20080008757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Special Actions Branch, Human Resources Command – St Louis which opines that the applicant was selected for promotion to the rank of CPT by the 2007 Department of the Army Reserve Components Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Selection Board and he was promoted to the rank of CPT on 20 September 2007, the date of his assignment to a valid higher graded position. In order to justify correction of a military record the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010060

    Original file (20130010060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 December 2012, HRC published Orders B-12208339 promoting him to CPT with an effective date and DOR of 22 August 2012. b. Paragraph 4-21b(2) (Promotion of unit officers) states unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the date the board is approved or the date of Senate confirmation (if required), provided they are assigned to a position in the higher grade. On 20 December 2012, an official of his higher-command G-1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003095

    Original file (20150003095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DOR to CPT was in May 2012 when it should have been in January 2012. Orders 12-024-00029, dated 24 January 2012, issued by HQ, 81st RSC, reassigning him from his current assignment to a TPU outside the command, 308th Psychological Operations (PO) Company, Belton, MO, effective 29 January 2012. c. Orders B-05-203517, dated 9 May 2012, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), promoting him to the rank of CPT with an effective date and DOR of 1 May 2012. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006163

    Original file (20080006163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his promotion effective date and date of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT/O-3) from 14 February 2005 to 4 October 2001, the date the President approved the June 2001 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Position Vacancy Board (PVB) and removal of his name from the November 2004 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The evidence shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to captain while assigned to paragraph and line number "260/03" by...