Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003095
Original file (20150003095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  29 October 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150003095 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be adjusted to 29 January 2012 from 1 May 2012.

2.  The applicant states his DOR to CPT was in May 2012 when it should have been in January 2012.  According to the Notification of Selection for Promotion memorandum, dated May 2011, his effective date of promotion and DOR should have been the date he was in the duty position as required by Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) - Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers).  His orders officially put him in the required position on 29 January 2012.

3.  The applicant provides two orders and a memorandum. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was appointed as a Reserve second lieutenant in the USAR on 16 May 2008.  On 30 November 2009, he was promoted to the rank/grade of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2.  He was assigned to the U.S. Army Transportation Surface Brigade, North Charleston, SC. 

2.  He provides and his record contains:

	a.  A memorandum, dated 18 May 2011, subject:  Notification of Selection for Promotion, from Headquarters (HQ), 81st Regional Support Command (RSC), Fort Jackson, SC, wherein it stated, in part, a Department of the Army Reserve Components Mandatory Selection had selected him for promotion [to CPT].  As a troop program unit (TPU) officer, to be promoted, he must be assigned to a duty position as required by Army Regulation 135-155 for his area of concentration (AOC).  His effective DOR would be the date he was in a duty position as required for his AOC.  

	b.  Orders 12-024-00029, dated 24 January 2012, issued by HQ, 81st RSC, reassigning him from his current assignment to a TPU outside the command, 308th Psychological Operations (PO) Company, Belton, MO, effective 29 January 2012.

	c.  Orders B-05-203517, dated 9 May 2012, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), promoting him to the rank of CPT with an effective date and DOR of 1 May 2012.

3.  AHRC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement), dated 1 May 2012, completed by the commander, 308th PO Company, shows the applicant was placed in a CPT, 37A (PO Officer), position on 1 May 2012.

4.  In the processing of this case an advisory opinion, dated 7 April 2015, was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotion Management, HRC.  The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request and stated the applicant's assertion that his DOR should be adjusted to 29 January 2012 was in error and did not have merit.  The applicant was assigned to the 308th PO Company on 29 January 2012.  The documents submitted by his chain of command show he was not assigned to a higher grade position until 1 May 2012.  This is his current DOR.

5.  On 30 April 2015, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for his information and comment or rebuttal; however, no response was received.

6.  Army Regulation 135-155 states, in part, an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must be filling a valid position in the next higher grade in order to be promoted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms, in accordance with governing regulations, the applicant was properly promoted to the rank of CPT on 1 May 2012 with a DOR of 1 May 2012.  Although he had been assigned to the 308th PO Company on 29 January 2012, his record shows he was not placed into a valid CPT position 

until 1 May 2012 and this the date he became eligible for promotion to CPT.  There was no error or injustice.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  ___X_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003095





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003095



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006163

    Original file (20080006163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his promotion effective date and date of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT/O-3) from 14 February 2005 to 4 October 2001, the date the President approved the June 2001 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Position Vacancy Board (PVB) and removal of his name from the November 2004 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The evidence shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to captain while assigned to paragraph and line number "260/03" by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002479C070205

    Original file (20060002479C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he should have been promoted to CPT during the September 2004 position vacancy board, but he was not promoted because his unit improperly placed him in the new TTHS (Trainee, Transient, Holdee, and Student) account. USAR position vacancy promotion consideration to fill a TPU position vacancy is authorized (1) when the Commander, USAHRC – St. Louis notifies a TPU commander that no qualified Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) officer of the authorized grade is geographically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004001

    Original file (20110004001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted various email exchange with his unit S-1, AMEDD career manager, and others that show: * 21 October 2008, his career manager advised him that his records would be considered by the January 2009 CPT AMEDD Reserve Components Board * 6 June 2009, his unit S-1 informed him he was not in a valid position and that he was assigned to the TTHS for medical reasons * 8 June 2009, he acknowledged the TTHS assignment but stated the medical issue had been resolved since the Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004416

    Original file (20140004416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. The applicant was assigned to a MAJ position in the NYARNG effective 14 March 2011. The evidence of record shows he was assigned to a USAR TPU prior to his selection for promotion to MAJ by a DA RC promotion board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adjusting his DOR and promotion effective date to MAJ to 7 June 2011.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027837

    Original file (20100027837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement for [U.S. Army Reserve Command] Mobilized TPU Officers), dated 25 August 2003, shows his commander verified he was qualified for promotion. An officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date he/she completes the maximum service. The evidence of record does not show errors in the applicant's rank or DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007159C071029

    Original file (20070007159C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 9 September 2003, the date he was promoted to MAJ. Therefore, it would be equitable to show the applicant was promoted to MAJ with a DOR and effective date of 12 June 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to Major with a date of rank and effective date of 12 June 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018430

    Original file (20130018430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which shows he was unjustly blocked from occupying the CPT/O-3 70B slot. In order for the applicant to have been promoted to CPT prior to 6 February 2013, he must have met all of the requirements for a Medical Service Corps officer in AOC 70B. Since there was not a valid vacancy for him to be promoted into and he was not fully qualified in AOC 70B until 1 February 2013, he was not eligible to be promoted prior to 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009470

    Original file (20130009470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided three UMRs, dated 2 June 2010, 24 August 2010, and 16 July 2011, which show: a. MSG CJ also stated that the applicant must complete the attached counseling and, by 27 May 2012, be reassigned to a valid position that meets COE and grade requirements or be subject to involuntary transfer to another unit, to the IRR, or elect retirement. (i) As a COE (MILTECH 365th) and in order to meet the senior grade overstrength guidance, she took a reduction in rank from SGM/E-9 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019716

    Original file (20080019716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This HRC-St. Louis promotion official stated that the applicant was REFRAD and transferred to the USAR on 12 May 1999, prior to his promotion eligibility date (PED). The HRC-St. Louis, Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, RC, further states that had the applicant been assigned to a higher graded position upon his 12 May 1999 discharge from the RA and transferred to the USAR he would have been eligible for promotion to CPT on his PED of 1 July 1999, or had he remained...