Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008556
Original file (20080008556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  28 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008556 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his promotion orders (Orders B-01-800898, dated 31 January 2008) be amended to show his date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (LTC) as 21 December 2007 or the earliest possible date following the release of board results.

2.  The applicant states that his unit changed Table of Distribution and Allowances (TDA) on 7 January 2008.  He alleges that his promotion date was erroneously assigned based on the date he was slotted against a new TDA.  Based on the old Unit Manning Report from August 2007 (under the old TDA), he was slotted in an LTC’s slot as of August 2007.  His name was hand-written on the Unit Manning Report because he was mobilized.  He states that mobilized service members cannot be entered electronically on the Unit Manning Report.  Since he was fully qualified and in the O-5 slot, his DOR should be 21 December 2007.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a Unit Manning Report, dated 15 August 2007, and his promotion orders to LTC.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 17 May 1987 in the rank of second lieutenant.  


2.  He was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Army National Guard on 9 June 1987.  Departments of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau, Special Orders Number 147 AR, dated 4 August 1987, granted him Federal Recognition effective 9 June 1987.

3.  The applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 29 July 1989. On the following date, he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and further assigned to the U.S. Chemical Center and School, Fort McClellan, Alabama.    

4.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 30 July 1989.  He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 17 May 1990.

5.  On 30 July 1992, the applicant was released from active duty in the rank of first lieutenant.  On the following date, he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  On an unknown date, he was assigned to a Troop Program Unit (TPU).  

6.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of captain on 16 May 1994 and he was promoted to the rank of major on 22 July 2001.

7.  The applicant provided a copy of a Unit Manning Report, prepared on 15 August 2007, which appears to show he was assigned to an O-5 position on 20 April 2006.  

8.  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Orders B-01-800898, dated 31 January 2008, promoted the applicant to the rank of LTC with an effective date and DOR of 8 January 2008.

9.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief of Promotions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, USAHRC, St. Louis, Missouri.  It was recommended that the applicant’s request be disapproved.  The opinion stated that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the 2007 Department of the Army (DA) Reserve Components Selection Board with a promotion eligibility date (PED) of 21 July 2008.  He was promoted to LTC with a DOR of 8 January 2008.  The opinion points out that the applicant was assigned to a higher graded position on
8 January 2008 per U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) Form 56-R.  The 


opinion states the approval date of the board was 21 December 2007 and he was not assigned in a higher graded position until 8 January 2008; therefore, his DOR of 8 January 2008 is correct.  

10.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant.  On 5 September 2008, he provided a copy of a Unit Manning Report; a memorandum from his commanding officer; and an AHRC Form 56-R, version dated 8 March 2008.  

11.  In a 6 September 2008 memorandum, the commanding officer of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battle Command Training Group, 3rd Brigade, 75th Division, Fort Sheridan, Illinois stated that the original AHRC Form 56-R contained the incorrect date the applicant was assigned to an LTC position.  The commanding officer stated the applicant was assigned to an LTC position as of 15 August 2007 and his promotion effective date should be 21 December 2007 (the approval date of the board).  The (corrected) AHRC Form 56-R shows the applicant was assigned to an LTC position on 15 August 2007.

12.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers.  The regulation provides that mandatory selection boards will be convened each year to consider Army Reserve officers in an active status for promotion to CPT through lieutenant colonel.

13.  Paragraph 4-21 of Army Regulation 135-155 covers the effective dates of promotion.  It states, in pertinent part, that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier that the date the 
board is approved or the date of Senate confirmation (if required), provided they are assigned to a position in the higher grade.  When the board approval or, if required, Senate confirmation is before assignment to the position in the higher grade, the effective date and the date of promotion will be the date of assignment to the higher graded position.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of major on 22 July 2001.




2.  The advisory opinion states the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the 2007 DA Reserve Components Selection Board and the board was approved on 21 December 2007.  

3.  The USAHRC advisory opinion stated the applicant was assigned to a higher graded position on 8 January 2008 based upon an AHRC Form 56-R they had received.  However, based on the memorandum, dated 6 September 2008, from 
the applicant’s commanding officer, the applicant was in an LTC, O-5 position as of 15 August 2007 and the original AHRC Form 56-R contained an incorrect date.

4.  Through no fault of the applicant, he was promoted to LTC with an effective date and DOR of 8 January 2008.  

5.  It appears that an injustice has occurred in this case regarding the applicant’s DOR to LTC.  Therefore, it would be equitable to adjust the applicant’s DOR and effective date of promotion to LTC to 21 December 2007, the approval date of the board.  The applicant’s finance records should also be corrected to show his effective date of promotion to LTC was 21 December 2007 and he should be paid any due back pay and allowances.  

BOARD VOTE:

____XX____  ____XX____  ____XX____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to LTC with an effective date and DOR of 21 December 2007.




2.  The Board further recommends that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) audit the applicant’s military pay account to determine the amount owed to him as a result of the above correction and that he be paid any back pay owed to him.



      _______XXXX_______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008556



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008556



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005969

    Original file (20080005969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The advisory official adds the Promotions/Notifications Branch promotes officers based on the information provided to them by the units and the applicant received the earliest date possible according to the information provided by the unit. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was promoted to the rank of LTC, effective and with a DOR of 8 January 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008554

    Original file (20080008554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s military service records show he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, in the rank of Second Lieutenant (2LT)/pay grade O-1, on 16 December 1988. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was promoted to the rank of LTC, effective and with a DOR of 8 January 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012708

    Original file (20090012708.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090012708 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that his promotion packet was erroneously removed from consideration by a position vacancy board (PVB). Although the regulation does not provide for promotion consideration by an SSB for erroneous non-consideration by a PVB, as matter of equity his DOR should be corrected to show 16 January 2008, the date of approval of the October 2007 PVB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013721

    Original file (20100013721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was in an O-5 slot from 9 June 2009 until 13 July 2009. He states he is being penalized for being involuntarily cross-leveled for deployment to Iraq, resulting in over 3 months of lost time in rank. Therefore, notwithstanding the advisory opinion received from HRC-St. Louis, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant's records to show he was promoted to lieutenant colonel with an effective date and DOR of 9 June 2009, with entitlement to back pay and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001682

    Original file (20090001682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She goes on to state that in November 2006, she inquired of the unit administrator as to how her mobilization would affect her promotion and was informed that she should not worry about not having a slot and that if she was selected for promotion or was released from active duty, they would help her locate a slot. She also contends that in fairness, the mobilized Soldier should be promoted on the date the list is approved and then be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000360

    Original file (20110000360.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was to be assigned to the Medical Retention Center, Fort Hood, TX, with report date of 8 December 2006 for a period of 179 days to end 4 June 2007. c. Texas Military Forces, Army National Guard, Orders 164-1057, dated 13 June 2007, which announce that effective 15 May 2007, she was transferred to the Inspector General, Headquarters and Headquarters Company 36th Infantry Division, Austin, TX. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018065

    Original file (20110018065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was assigned to a CPT’s position on 9 September 2008; however, he was not promoted to the rank of CPT until 15 October 2008 because officials at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) did not see that he was in a CPT’s position until 15 October 2008. It is also noted that the advisory opinion clearly states the USAHRC can adjust his DOR if his unit provides the necessary documents (AHRC Form 56-R) verifying his contentions; however, the applicant has provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027893

    Original file (20100027893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A promotion worksheet and AHRC Form 56-R filed in the applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) shows the officer's position upon promotion would be 0145/9992 and he was assigned to that position effective 7 July 2010. It states in: a. Paragraph 4-18, the Secretary of the Army may determine whether an adjustment must be made to an officer's DOR and effective date of promotion due to an involuntary delay of promotion of the officer. b. Paragraph 4-21b, the effective date and date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021131

    Original file (20090021131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). He was promoted with a date of rank of 18 August 2009 and an effective date of 19 August 2009. e. In accordance with information received from LTC E__ S__, who was Chief, DA Secretariat-STL during the board process, the Officer Management Branch had three valid higher graded positions they could have used to assign the applicant to when publishing his assignment orders. However, evidence indicates that once it was known he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...