Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017338
Original file (20110017338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    8 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017338 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart and a promotion to sergeant/E-5.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

	a.  in February 1991 a rocket/grenade exploded close to him in Southwest Asia and injured his face and eyes.  He passed out for about 30 minutes.  He was told he was going to be promoted and awarded the Purple Heart for his actions but his orders and records were lost.

	b.  he became impaired with several medical conditions (eye problems, stomach problems, tinnitus, undiagnosed musculoskeletal system clavicula or scapula condition, impairment of his right and left shoulders with arthritis, right knee condition with arthritis, and skin rash) due to his injuries suffered in the military.

	c.  he needs the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to recognize these injuries as service-connected disabilities. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Medical evaluation, dated 27 September 2010
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 October 1988 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (cannon crewmember).  He attained the rank of specialist.  He served in Southwest Asia from 26 September 1990 to 26 March 1991.  

3.  His DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record, Part 1), prepared on 
3 August 1992, shows his physical profile as 111111.

4.  On 16 October 1992, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) (Reinforcement) to complete his service obligation. 

5.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "SPC" [specialist].  Item 4b (Pay Grade) shows the entry "E-4."  His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart in the awards section.

6.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.

7.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart.

8.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 shows he was promoted to specialist effective 1 April 1990.

9.  There are no orders showing he was promoted to sergeant in the available records.

10.  His discharge orders from the USAR, dated 22 October 1996, show his rank as specialist.

11.  He provides a medical evaluation, dated 27 September 2010, which states he is being treated for:

* Anxiety disorder (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)
* Digestive system (coexisting abdominal condition)
* Loss of eyesight (damage to his left eye)
* Tinnitus – bilateral hearing loss (progressive hearing loss)
* Mesial temporal sclerosis
* Skin disorder (seborreica dermatitis, warts)

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) states a Soldier must be recommended for promotion and appear before a promotion board for promotion to sergeant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends a rocket/grenade injured his face and eyes in Southwest Asia in February 1991.  

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for the Purple Heart and all other awards.  The Purple Heart requires:

* a wound was the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by military medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records
* official orders awarding the decoration

3.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Southwest Asia.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.




4.  He contends he was told he would be promoted to sergeant for his actions.  However, there are no promotion orders in his records and he did not provide any evidence showing he was promoted to sergeant prior to his separation.  In addition, there is no evidence which shows he was recommended for promotion or appeared before a promotion board for promotion to sergeant.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request for a promotion.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017338



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017338



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004369

    Original file (20080004369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation further states that there is no time limit on submission of requests for award of the Purple Heart. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069565C070402

    Original file (2002069565C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009185C070206

    Original file (20050009185C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his exposure to chemical and biological agents while deployed during the Gulf War caused Bowens Disease and has made him completely and permanently disabled. He was born on 3 October 1944 and after serving 10 years, 2 months and 28 days of active service in the Air Force, he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5 on 12 May 1977 with a total of 11 years, 3 months and 16 days of service for pay purposes. While the applicant has provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004723

    Original file (20130004723.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides: * Congressional correspondence * Denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), request for award of the Purple Heart * Incomplete DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Standard Forms 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * Incomplete DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation - Line of Duty and Misconduct Statement) * DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073075C070403

    Original file (2002073075C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show award of the Purple Heart in 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized). There is no military medical record that shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during service in Southwest Asia. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that the applicant was not wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079856C070215

    Original file (2002079856C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Southwest Asia. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was injured by enemy released chemical, biological, or a nuclear agent in Southwest Asia.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008916

    Original file (20080008916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Military Awards regulation states the fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award of the Purple Heart. Although the DVA Rating Decision indicates that the applicant was granted service-connection for left ear hearing loss, there are no military medical documents available to the Board which verifies he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016993

    Original file (20140016993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant provides: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020327

    Original file (20100020327.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for eye damage he received in country while serving in Iraq/Kuwait in March 1991. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03245

    Original file (BC-2005-03245.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ever since this injury, the right elbow and forearm area have been a problem. The applicant did not provide medical documentation to substantiate injuries received were a result of enemy action. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the applicant’s submission, the Board is not persuaded he should be awarded the PH Medal.