Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008916
Original file (20080008916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	    

		BOARD DATE:	  	   7 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008916 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.  

2.  The applicant states that he lost his hearing in combat due to rockets and mortars over a period of 6 to 7 days.  His left ear was bleeding and the medic told him that he ruptured his ear drum.  The medic also told him that there was nothing to be done and his ear would be alright in a few days.  He states he has tinnitus in his left ear with a 10 percent disability rating and a zero percent disability rating for hearing loss.  

3.  The applicant provides a portion of a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 August 1969.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 36C (lineman).  He was assigned to Vietnam on 12 April 1970.  His highest grade achieved was specialist four (SP4)/ E-4.

3.  There are no orders which show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he sustained wounds as a result of hostile action.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

4.  The applicant was released from active duty on 31 March 1971.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal as authorized awards.  

5.  The DVA Rating Decision shows the applicant was granted service-connection for tinnitus at a 10 percent disability rating and hearing loss in his left ear at zero percent disability rating on 29 June 2005.  Service-connection for hearing loss in his right ear was not granted.  

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Paragraph 2-8b(2) states that for the purpose of considering an award of the Purple Heart, a “wound” is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained while in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.  The regulation states that the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders which authorize award of the Purple Heart to the applicant.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

2.  The applicant contends that he lost his hearing in combat due to rockets and mortars.

3.  The Military Awards regulation states the fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award of the Purple Heart.  The degree to which the enemy caused the injury must be considered.  

4.  Although the DVA Rating Decision indicates that the applicant was granted service-connection for left ear hearing loss, there are no military medical documents available to the Board which verifies he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated by military medical personnel.  In addition, his Enlisted Qualification Record does not list any wounds he received as a result of hostile action in item 40.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____XX____  ___XX_____  ___XX_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ______XXXX________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008916



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008916



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000416

    Original file (20080000416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Assault Badge, the Long Range Reconnaissance Platoon (LRRP) Badge (Tab), the Purple Heart, and any other citations to which he is entitled. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant completed an air assault training course. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show the LRRP Badge (Tab) is noted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007041

    Original file (20080007041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His ears were also damaged at the Battle of Dau Tieng as indicated in the letter from a journalist. The applicant provided a letter from a former fellow Soldier, who was a combat correspondent for the 3rd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division at Dau Tieng, South Vietnam from August 1968 to August 1969. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002119

    Original file (20120002119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA documents severe hearing loss in both ears and this condition has left him with poor communication skills which cannot be improved and has affected his employability since his return from Vietnam in 1970. c. A second self-authored statement, dated 22 December 2011, in which he describes two additional sapper attacks during his service in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011159

    Original file (20080011159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain an SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 16 November 1971, which was completed by the attending physician at the time of the applicant’s medical examination prior to his release from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military service records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in Item 41...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103474C070208

    Original file (2004103474C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a 1-page medical record from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) dated 15 January 2004; a 1-page medical record from the DVA dated 21 January 2000; a 1-page medical record from the DVA dated 24 April 2003; an extract from his service medical records; a 3-page attachment to a DVA claim; a letter dated 6 March 1969; a letter addressed to the National Archives and Records Administration dated 26 October 1999; and his DD Form 214. In pertinent part, it states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081051C070215

    Original file (2002081051C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004719C070206

    Original file (20050004719C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds incurred in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003061

    Original file (20110003061.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded in combat while serving with the 299th Engineer Battalion (Combat) at Dak To in Vietnam on 10 June 1969. c. evidence in that former unit member's record on the integrated Personnel Electronic Record Management System confirms he was assigned to the applicant's unit, he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 10 June 1969, and he claimed those wounds occurred while at Dak To when his unit came under a rocket attack d. A certificate, dated 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024677

    Original file (20100024677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides medical documentation and an audiological evaluation as new evidence that will be considered by the Board. His service record doesn't contain any orders which show he was awarded the Purple Heart or medical documentation which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Item 22 of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 5 May 1972, shows his ears were evaluated as normal.