Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017127
Original file (20110017127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 21 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017127


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was shot on 25 September 1971 and has been collecting disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) since 1974.  He states that after looking into the incident, he realized the award of the Purple Heart was omitted from his DD Form 214.  He states it is a big deal and he would like his records corrected so he can get this final award.

3.  The applicant provides his VA rating decision, dated 27 January 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted into the Regular Army, for a 3-year term, on 11 July 1968.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63A (Mechanical Maintenance Helper).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.  

3.  On 27 March 1971, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows:  

   a. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M14 and M-16), and 1 overseas service bar; and 

   b. Item 30 (Remarks) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 20 April 1970 to on or about 26 March 1971.  

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank, indicating he did not sustain any wounds during his military service.

5.  His available record does not contain orders for the Purple Heart, nor does it contain any documentation pertaining to the treatment of any wounds or injuries he sustained during his service in Vietnam.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  He provides his VA rating decision, dated 27 January 2009.  Page 3 of this document contains the entry, "We have conceded an in-service stressor due to you being shot in the right shoulder by a Vietnamese Soldier while in Vietnam.  Service treatment records dated 25 September 1970, document this incident."  However, these service treatment records are not contained within his available record, and he did not provide them.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Neither his available records nor the Vietnam casualty roster provide any evidence he was wounded in Vietnam during his period of service.  There is also no evidence he received any wounds, as a result of hostile action, that required treatment by medical personnel, or that the resulting medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

2.  The VA rating decision he provided eludes to service treatment records that document a gunshot wound he received in Vietnam on 25 September 1970; however, these service treatment records are not contained within his available record, and he did not provide them.  Therefore, the rating decision itself is insufficient to establish his combat wound.
 
3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017127



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024640

    Original file (20110024640.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he is entitled to awards as a result of receiving three gunshot wounds while serving in Vietnam and believes he did not receive his awards because of a line of duty investigation which stated his wounds were a result of misconduct. The evidence shows he participated in one campaign while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show this unit award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004078

    Original file (20130004078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states treatment of his wounds should be in his military medical records. The applicant's complete military medical records are not available for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012793

    Original file (20090012793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. he served in Vietnam from 5 January 1970 through 14 February 1971; b. on 18 January 1970, his second day in an operational assignment in Vietnam, he became a helicopter door gunner with A Troop, 2nd Squadron, 17th Calvary and he served in that capacity for his entire tour of duty; c. his awards are listed as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Aircraft Crewman Badge, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007352

    Original file (20100007352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005677C070205

    Original file (20060005677C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015205

    Original file (20060015205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015205 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003246

    Original file (20110003246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence he submitted shows he was wounded on 3 February 1968. The qualifying period of service for award of the CIB in Korea on the DMZ was from 4 January 1969 to 31 March 1994. Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005254

    Original file (20080005254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 27 November 1970 in Vietnam; b. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 11 June 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009238

    Original file (20080009238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 27 June 1970, shows that the aircraft in which the applicant was flying made a long approach to the airfield. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. He submitted a letter from the physician who attended his injuries as a result of the airplane...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019189

    Original file (20080019189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records showing he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. However, there are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.