Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005677C070205
Original file (20060005677C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        11 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060005677


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. David Gallagher               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Roland Venable                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was shot by the enemy, treated in Pleiku
and Cam Ranh Bay, and then flown to Japan.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or
Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 30 November 1971.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 12 April 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant underwent a pre-induction physical examination on 14
August 1969.  Item 38 (Spine, Other Musculoskeletal) on his Standard Form
88 (Report of Medical Examination) was rated as normal.  He was inducted on
19 May 1970.  He arrived in Vietnam on 2 December 1970.  He served as a
pioneer assigned to the 589th Engineer Company in Vietnam from 14 December
1970 through
10 August 1971.  He was assigned to Company A, 299th Engineer Battalion in
Vietnam from 26 August 1971 through 16 November 1971.  He was assigned to
Company C, 84th Engineer Battalion in Vietnam from 17 November 1971 through
29 November 1971.  On 30 November 1971, the applicant was released from
active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year,
6 months, and 12 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal,
the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with
Device 1960, two awards of the Overseas Service Bar, the Sharpshooter
Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), and the Marksman
Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) as authorized
awards.

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of
hostile action in Vietnam.

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not
show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20
is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty
Roster.

7.  On 30 November 1971, the applicant underwent a separation physical
examination.  Item 38 on this Standard Form 88 was rated as abnormal with
the entry, “GSW R [gunshot wound right] buttocks.”  However, there is no
evidence of record which shows this injury was the result of hostile action
in Vietnam.

8.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good
Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by
his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal.  His records do
not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency
ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

9.  Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his
assignment in Vietnam.

10.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award
of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to
Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units
during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters,
U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965
to
28 March 1973.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.

12.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and
criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the
Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted
active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and,
for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June
1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's
conduct and efficiency ratings must
have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service
except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic
proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was
not disqualifying.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal
until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award
and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a
bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed
in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service
stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends that he was shot by the enemy, there is
no evidence in the available records which shows that he was wounded or
injured as a result of hostile action.  Contemporaneous medical evidence
shows the applicant sustained a gunshot wound to his buttocks after his
induction.  However, there is no evidence which shows this injury was the
result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Regrettably, there is insufficient
evidence on which to base any award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2.  The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist four with 18
months of creditable active service with no time lost.  Therefore, it
appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of
the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 May 1970 through 30 November 1971
based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the
termination of a period of Federal military service.

3.  The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in
Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two
bronze service stars.

4.  The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was
awarded to all units which served in Vietnam.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 30 November 1971; therefore, the time for the
applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 29
November 1974.  Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's
statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file
based on the fact there is no statute of limitations on requests for award
of the Purple Heart.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

PM_____  __DG___  __RV____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by:


      a.  awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the
period 19 May 1970 through 30 November 1971; and

      b.  amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal and to show
that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service
stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the Purple Heart.




                                  ___Patrick McGann_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060005677                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061011                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |107.0000                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009988

    Original file (20090009988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20060005677, on 11 October 2006. The applicant submitted the following medical documents in support of his combat injury: a. DA Form 3647-1, dated 5 May 1971, shows the applicant was wounded in action by hostile small arms fire on 15 March 1971 in Pleiku, Republic of Vietnam. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000263C070206

    Original file (20050000263C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that shows that he was wounded, or treated for wounds or injuries, as a result of hostile action. Therefore he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart or to correction of his records to show this decoration. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of: a. the First Award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 March 1970 to 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016808

    Original file (20080016808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. Orders on file in the applicant's service personnel record, General Orders Number 140, paragraph 1, published by Headquarters, 12th Evacuation Hospital (SMBL), dated 17 June 1970, show he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds he received in connection with military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012162

    Original file (20100012162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of hostile action on 25 September 1971; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003239

    Original file (20070003239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Records show that the applicant participated in eight campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106796C070208

    Original file (2004106796C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 May 1968 through 15 May 1971 and amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017866

    Original file (20130017866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. There are no orders or other corroborating evidence in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058809C070421

    Original file (2001058809C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Government of Vietnam awarded this medal to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the VCM. The applicant's records should also be corrected to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010518

    Original file (20140010518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 15 May 1968 * deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060016858C071029

    Original file (AR20060016858C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This ruling, in effect, granted the service Secretaries the authority to award the Purple Heart to individuals directly engaged in armed conflict who were killed or wounded as a result of "friendly fire." This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...