Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016797
Original file (20110016797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  18 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016797 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his entry level status characterization to honorable.

2.  The applicant states that he is a Federal employee and cannot obtain military credit for his service because his DD Form 214 states "entry level status.”

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 ending on 23 April 1986; and his discharges orders from the U.S. Army Reserve in 1993.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 19 August 1985 for a period of 
8 years.

3.  On 27 October 1985, the applicant entered active duty for the purpose of completing his initial active duty training (IADT).

	a.  4 November 1985 to 21 January 1986: Basic Combat Training at Fort Jackson, south Carolina; and

	b.  22 January to 23 April 1986: Advanced Individual Training at Fort Gordon, Georgia for military occupational specialty (MOS) 31C (Radio Teletype Operator.

4.  Records show the applicant successfully completed his IADT.  He was released from active duty and reassigned to the 230th Signal Battalion, located in Burlington, North Carolina.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

	a.  he completed 5 months and 27 days of creditable active duty service;

	b.  he was awarded MOS 31C; and

	c.  his character of service as "entry level status."

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effect at the time, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provided the following six standards characterizations for entry in Item 24 (Character of Service) of the 
DD Form 214:

* Honorable
* Under Honorable Conditions (General)
* Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
* Bad Conduct
* Dishonorable
* Uncharacterized




7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), as in effect at the time, provided:

	a.  that ARNG Soldiers who successfully completed their IADT and were in an entry level status would receive an uncharacterized character of service; and

	b.  that for ARNG Soldiers, entry-level status began upon enlistment in the ARNG and terminated 180 days after the beginning of one continuous period of training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his character of service as honorable because, as a Federal employee, he cannot obtain military service credit with an entry level status.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was an ARNG Soldier ordered to active duty for one continuous period of IADT.  He successfully completed his training and was returned to his ARNG unit.  Because the length of his service was less than 180 days he was still in an entry level status at the time of his release from active duty.

3.  The applicant's desire to obtain recognition of his military service now that he is a Federal employee is not a justifiable basis for changing his characterization of service.

4.  However, the governing regulation required that ARNG Soldiers, who were separated from active duty in an entry level status, even though they successfully completed their IADT, receive an uncharacterized character of service.  The applicant's DD Form 214 incorrectly shows "Entry Level Status."  Therefore, this entry should be changed to read "Uncharacterized."

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing an uncharacterized character of service on his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing an honorable characterization of service on his DD Form 214.




      _________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016797





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016797



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053014C070420

    Original file (2001053014C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 19 February 1987, be corrected to show he was honorably separated. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on IADT and was in an ELS status when separated. The applicant’s uncharacterized service is not derogatory, but shows his service as active duty of less than 180 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020663

    Original file (20130020663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to show his active duty time while he was in boot camp (63 days), advanced individual training (AIT) (91 days), and to show "Honorable" discharge. An error was made to his active duty service orders when ordered to his initial active duty for training (IADT) which caused an incorrect entry of the net active duty time served on his DD Form 214. It...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019629

    Original file (20100019629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states these items are in error because she completed the active service, entry-level status is not an authorized character of service entry, and expiration of term of service (ETS) is the incorrect reason for her separation. The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 February 1986 and entered initial active duty for training (IADT) on 25 April 1986. Her DD Form 214 for this period of service contains the following entries: * item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015134

    Original file (20110015134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 December 1988 to show honorable instead of uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. It further provided that the characterization of service of Soldiers separated under this chapter who are in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022182

    Original file (20120022182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized character of service to honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added). Thus,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011759

    Original file (20120011759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 November 1998, he was honorably discharged from the USAR. Therefore, because he was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from IADT, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. The DD Form 256A he submitted is based on his discharge from the USAR on 2 November 1998, over 7 years after his release from IADT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000248

    Original file (20120000248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 2 December 1985 be corrected to show her characterization of service as honorable. The applicant states: a. she completed 4 months of active duty service during basic and advanced individual training (AIT) and returned to service with the Army National Guard (ARNG); b. she received an honorable discharge (HD) after completing 22.5 years service in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025111

    Original file (20100025111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized character of service to honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added). Thus,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011199

    Original file (20120011199.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the characterization of his service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable on the following documents: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 28 February 1985 * National Guard Board (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) with an effective date of 28 February 1985 2. b. Paragraph 5-5 stated personnel being separated under this section would be awarded a character of service of honorable,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019705

    Original file (20130019705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 July 1986 to show item 24 (Character of Service) as honorable vice entry-level status. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows she was released from IADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4 by reason of expiration term of service. Every case is individually decided...