Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019705
Original file (20130019705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 November 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019705 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 July 1986 to show item 24 (Character of Service) as honorable vice entry-level status.

2.  The applicant states the characterization of her service on this DD Form 214 needs to be changed to honorable in order for her to receive credit for retirement by the Office of Personnel Management.  She believes this DD Form 214 was in error.  She graduated from basic training (BT) and advanced individual training (AIT) in 1986.  She has successfully completed many military schools, up to Command and General Staff College, and has been an active member of the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) for almost 28 years.

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 July 1986 and a Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) Form 1340/2 (Estimated Earnings during Military Service (for Civil Service Retirement Purposes)). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 3 February 1986 for a period of 8 years.

3.  She entered initial active duty for training (IADT) on 12 February 1986 and was assigned to Fort Jackson, SC, for BT and AIT.  She successfully completed BT and AIT and she was awarded military occupational specialty 71L (Administrative Specialist).

4.  She was honorably released from IADT on 2 July 1986 to the control of her USAR unit.  She completed 4 months and 21 days (or 141 days) of creditable active service during this period of service.

5.  The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows she was released from IADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4 by reason of expiration term of service.  Item 24 shows her character of service as entry-level status.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  

   a.  Chapter 3 describes the different types of characterization of service.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time of her separation stated an uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation.  A separation is described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a member is in entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT, entry-level status terminates 180 after beginning training (emphasis added).

   b.  Chapter 4 provides that a Soldier will be separated upon the expiration of enlistment or the fulfillment of the service obligation.  A Soldier being separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of the service obligation will be awarded a character of service of honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status and the service is uncharacterized.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant entered IADT on 12 February 1986 and she was released from IADT on 2 July 1986.  She completed 4 months and 21 days (141 days) of active service and was separated while in an entry-level status.  

2.  As a USAR Soldier attending IADT, her entry-level status would terminate 180 days after entering IADT.  As she served for 141 days and she was still in an entry-level status at the time of her separation, she was not entitled to receive an honorable character of service.  Her DD Form 214 properly shows her character of service as entry-level status.  

3.  The ABCMR does not grant requests for the correction of records solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for retirement or other benefits.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant requests a correction to his/her military records.

4.  An uncharacterized or entry-level status discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not served on active duty long enough for his/her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

5.  In view of the foregoing, she is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case




are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019705





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019705



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025111

    Original file (20100025111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized character of service to honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added). Thus,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024458

    Original file (20100024458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant requests her USAR discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable because she will receive a civilian position based on an honorable discharge. However, her record contains orders that show she was discharged from the USAR on 27 May 1996 with an uncharacterized discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022182

    Original file (20120022182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized character of service to honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added). Thus,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003360

    Original file (AR20130003360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level status was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with character of service described as uncharacterized. However, the characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation is normally honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013161

    Original file (20110013161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 December 1996, the medical approving authority approved the findings of the EPSBD and recommended that the she be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). b. paragraph 3-7b, a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. d. paragraph 5-11 that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009678

    Original file (20110009678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. There is no evidence of record that shows she completed AIT. However, she provided her EPSBD proceedings which indicate in 1986 the EPSBD found her medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and determined her foot condition existed prior to her entry into military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003313

    Original file (20130003313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the reason for his discharge be changed from "Failure to Report to [Initial Active Duty Training (IADT)] Phase 1 or 2" to "Medical" and that his discharge be reclassified from uncharacterized to "Medical/Honorable." The applicant provides * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * U.S. Army Infantry School Certificate, dated 26 July 2002 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement),dated 6 September 2002 * four Standard Forms (SF)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...