Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011759
Original file (20120011759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011759 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he received a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) after he received his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

3.  The applicant provides his:

* DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 March 1991
* DD Form 256A, dated 3 November 1998

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Arizona Army National Guard (AZARNG) on
30 October 1990.  He was ordered to one continuous period of initial active duty for training (IADT) on 14 November 1990.  He completed the required training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 77F (Petroleum Supply Specialist).

3.  On 12 March 1991, he was released from active duty and returned to his AZARNG unit.  He completed 3 months and 29 days of net active service this period with a character of service of uncharacterized.  Based on his date of entry on IADT, his entry-level status would have terminated on 13 May 1991.

4.  On 8 August 1992, he was honorably discharged from the AZARNG and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  On 3 November 1998, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Paragraph 4-2 provided that the service of ARNG and USAR Soldiers who successfully completed a period of IADT to which ordered and who were in an entry-level status was uncharacterized, even though they had completed their IADT successfully.

	b.  Entry-level status for ARNG and USAR Soldiers was defined as the period from enlistment in the ARNG or USAR until 180 days after beginning training for those Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Based on the date he began his IADT, his entry level status would have ended on 13 May 1991.  However, he was released from IADT on 12 March 1991.  As such, he was in an entry-level status on the date of his separation from active duty.  Therefore, because he was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from IADT, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time.

2.  The DD Form 256A he submitted is based on his discharge from the USAR on 2 November 1998, over 7 years after his release from IADT.  It does not change the characterization of service for his period of active duty from
14 November 1990 through 12 March 1991.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  The applicant is advised an uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011759



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011759



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003836

    Original file (AR20130003836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: U.S. Army Human Resources Command orders D-05-516471, dated 10 May 2005, showing the applicant was discharged from the USAR effective 10 May 2005 with a characterization of honorable. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 149, copy of DA Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 10 May 2005, and copy of DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. In the case of a USAR Soldier on active duty (AD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003883

    Original file (20090003883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of block 24 (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the character of his service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. After completing 3 years, 5 month and 7 days of service in the MAARNG, the applicant was honorably discharged on 21 January 1994 under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 8-27s, due to incompatible occupation and he was assigned to the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020333

    Original file (20130020333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 May 1991 to show "honorable" or "general, under honorable conditions" instead of "uncharacterized." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 was a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. Though evidence shows she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008030

    Original file (20090008030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); Headquarters, 2nd Troop, 104th Aviation Battalion, Annville, PA, memorandum, dated 9 December 1995; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military Affairs, The Adjutant General, Annville, PA, Orders 025-012, dated 6 February 1996; NGB Form 22 (Report of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016872

    Original file (20080016872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the characterization of his active service for initial active duty for training (IADT) completed on 7 December 1991 be changed to honorable. The applicant had not completed 180 days of active service when he was released from IADT on 7 December 1991. Because the applicant was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015381

    Original file (20130015381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was given an honorable separation from active duty, versus an uncharacterized separation, and she was separated in the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021968

    Original file (20120021968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show her service as honorable. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added); and (2) paragraph 3-9, that separation will be described as an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000459

    Original file (20120000459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her uncharacterized discharges of 1990 and 2002 to honorable discharges. A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows she was released from the ARNG with uncharacterized service on 28 March 1990 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) for the remainder of her statutory obligation. c. An uncharacterized separation will be initiated when a Soldier is released from IADT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010687

    Original file (20090010687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "uncharacterized" to "general under honorable conditions." He completed 64 days of active service but was not issued a DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.