Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011732
Original file (20120011732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011732 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB).  

2.  The applicant states he should receive the CMB based on his service as a combat medical corpsman with the 1st Infantry Division in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and more specifically with the 1st Battalion, 7th Artillery Regiment.  

3.  The applicant provides a four-page self-authored letter and RVN unit map in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The record shows the applicant was  inducted into the Army on 19 April 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist).  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant served in the RVN from 9 September 1968 to 22 November 1969.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to Headquarters and Company A, 1st Medical Battalion, 1st Infantry Division, performing duties in MOS 91A as a litterbearer from 18 September 1968 to 30 April 1969; and to Headquarters and Headquarters Service Battery, 1st Battalion, 7th Artillery Regiment, performing duties in MOS 91B as a battery aidman from 18 September through 19 November 1969.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CMB in the list of earned awards entered.  

4.  The applicant’s record is void of documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB, or that confirms his presence and participation with a qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  

5.  On 22 November 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of specialist five/E-5, after completing 1 year, 7 months, and 4 days of active military service.  The CMB is not included in the list of earned awards contained on the DD Form 214.  It does list the following earned awards:

* National Defense Service Medal 
* Vietnam Service Medal 
* Vietnam Campaign Medal 
* Army Commendation Medal 

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy.  Chapter 8 contains guidance on Badges and Tabs of U.S. Origin and paragraph 8-7 contains guidance on award of the CMB.  It states the CMB may be awarded to members of the Army Medical Department (Colonels and below), the Naval Medical Department (Captains and below), the Air Force Medical Service (Colonels and below), assigned or attached by appropriate orders to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, or to a medical unit of company or smaller size, organic to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period the infantry unit is engaged in actual ground combat on or after 6 December 1941.  Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy. 



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to be awarded the CMB has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. 

2.  By regulation, in order to support award of the CMB a member must be assigned or attached by appropriate orders to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, or to a medical unit of company or smaller size, organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and must have been present and with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  Battle/combat service alone does not support award of the CMB. 

3.  The evidence of record shows that during his RVN tour, the applicant was assigned to a medical battalion and artillery regiment.  There is no evidence of record showing he was ever assigned to a qualifying infantry unit or a medical unit organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  The fact the applicant participated in combat with an artillery or other type unit within an infantry division does not satisfy the infantry unit criteria necessary to support award of the CMB.  

4.  Absent evidence showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CMB has not been satisfied in this case.  

5.  The applicant and all others concerned should know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011732



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011732



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029

    Original file (20060010106C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016548

    Original file (20110016548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Combat service only does not support award of the CMB. Absent evidence showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CMB has not been satisfied in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010879

    Original file (20090010879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 38 shows that while serving in the RVN he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 91A as a radio telephone operator and 91B as a medical specialist, and item 41(Awards and Decorations) shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), 1 Overseas Service Bar, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016233

    Original file (20140016233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: * he held MOS 91B as his primary MOS, and it was the only MOS he was ever awarded * he served on active duty from March 1966 through March 1969, and he served in MOS 91B during the entire period of active duty * he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 28 February 1967 through 15 May 1968; however, it does not list the unit he served with or indicate what his duty title was at that time 4. The evidence of record shows the applicant held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015502

    Original file (20090015502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). As a result, the NPRC letter is not sufficient as a basis for entitlement to a military award or for correction of military records to show a military award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008007

    Original file (20080008007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist). There are no orders in the applicant's record showing that he was awarded the CMB. There is no evidence in the applicant's official file to show he was recommended for or awarded the CMB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006293

    Original file (20120006293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 16 October 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006293 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Although he provided letters and a 2-page Vietnamese document showing he was in the RVN, this alone does not show he participated in combat. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004699

    Original file (20090004699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 September 1968 through 29 September 1971, and to add it to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 30...