Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016420
Original file (20110016420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  23 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016420 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her last name in item 1 (Name) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed. 

2.  The applicant states:

* her last name was changed due to marriage
* she got married on 18 August 2010

3.  The applicant provides her marriage certificate/license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 November 1986 using the last name of Wxxxxx.  

2.  In 1988, she married her first husband and changed her last name to Dxxxx. 

3.  She remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments until she retired on 31 July 2010 in the rank of sergeant first class.

4.  Item 1 of her DD Form 214 shows the last name of Dxxxx.

5.  Her service personnel records from 1988 to the present show her last name as Dxxxx.

6.  She provided her marriage certificate/license which shows she remarried on 18 August 2010 and her last name was changed to Kxxxx. 

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  

2.  Her service personnel records from 1988 to 31 July 2010 show she served under the last name of Dxxxx, which was her first husband's last name.  She retired from active duty under this last name.  She remarried in August 2010 a few weeks after she retired and her last name is now Kxxxx.  While the applicant's desire to have the records changed is understandable, there is no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records, in particular, the applicant’s DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document which confirms her married name change will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the names in her OMPF and satisfy her desire to have her current married name documented in her OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016420



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016420



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004974

    Original file (20120004974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to reflect her name change. Her last name changed from "Bar__" to "Mor__" in her service records; however, her name was then recorded in her service records as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__." The applicant's service personnel records show: * she enlisted under her maiden name of "Bar__, Kar__ Eli__" * her name for an unknown reason was changed in marriage to "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" * she retired as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021483

    Original file (20140021483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and other official records to show her last name as G_____ vice A_____. This document stated, "Your military records have been corrected to show the change you requested. She was remarried after her retirement and her DD Form 214 was prepared as a record of her service at the time of retirement from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019267

    Original file (20110019267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documents contained in her military records show she served under the last name of G____. Her records do not show she changed her last name at the time to S____. She provides documentation showing she changed her last name after her discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005449

    Original file (20140005449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her last name on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 30 September 2006 be changed to Hitti. Her DD Form 214 with a separation date of 30 September 2006 shows her last name as Vxxx Exxx. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004055

    Original file (20130004055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's request for a change of her last name from "Txxxxx" to "Axxxxxxxxx" on her DD Form 214 was carefully considered. Her record of service shows she served under various last names, none of which were the last name she now...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025894

    Original file (20100025894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to reflect her last name of “K----t.” 2. The applicant states that she married on 26 June 2010 and changed her maiden name of "O---n" to “K----t” and desires her records to be changed accordingly. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019989

    Original file (20110019989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 5 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019989 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. While the applicant's desire to have her records changed is understandable, there is no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records, in particular, the applicant's DD Form 214. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document which confirms her married name change will be filed in her official military personnel file (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013293C071029

    Original file (20060013293C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that she receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity based on the death of her first husband, a former service member (FSM). Further, there is no evidence of record, or independent evidence provided by the applicant, showing that the FSM ever attempted to enroll in the SBP within a year of his marriage...