Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021483
Original file (20140021483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021483


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and other official records to show her last name as G_____ vice A_____.   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, she is requesting her new last name be reflected on her official files due to a divorce and remarriage.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* a copy of a State of Virginia – In the Circuit Court of Richmond City, a Final Decree of Divorce entered 23 May 2011 with a certificating document, dated 31 May 2011
* a State of North Carolina, Certification of Vital Record – Application, License and Certificate of Marriage, dated 14 September 2012
* DD Form 1343 (Notification of Change in Service Member's Official Records), with an Information Paper from the Veterans Inquiry Section at U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 27 October 2014

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army and entered active duty on 6 August 1981.  She completed training and served as a Medical Services Corps Officer.  


2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was honorably retired on 31 July 2005 by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  She completed 23 years,    11 months, and 25 days of net active service.  Item 1 (Name (Last, First, Middle)) of her DD Form 214 shows her last name as A_____.  

3.  The applicant provided a copy of her divorce decree from the State of Virginia – In the Circuit Court of Richmond City with a certificating document, dated         31 May 2011.  She also provided a Certificate of Marriage from the State of North Carolina, which shows she remarried on 14 September 2012 and established her last name as G_____.  

4.  The applicant provides a DD Form 1343 (Notification of Change in Service Member's Official Records), dated 27 October 2014.  It stated the reason for change as "Marriage Certificate."  This form was accompanied by an information paper, dated 27 October 2014, from U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Veterans Inquiry Section.  This document stated, "Your military records have been corrected to show the change you requested.  Enclosed is a DD Form 1343.  The official seal of The Adjutant General has been embossed on this document as proof of its authenticity.  A copy of this form has been distributed to the appropriate agencies."

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  In states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of her DD Form 214 and other official records to show her last name as G_____ vice A_____ due to remarrying was carefully considered.  

2.  The evidence clearly shows the applicant was remarried on 14 September 2012 and changed her last name to G_____.  However, this does not change the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time her service records were created.  She was remarried after her retirement and her DD Form 214 was prepared as a record of her service at the time of retirement from active duty.      

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record her married name in her military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document, as well as the DD Form 1343 prepared by U.S. Army Human Resources Command will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the name difference recorded in her military record and to satisfy her desire to have her married name documented in her OMPF.

5.  In addition, the approved last name change by U.S. Army Human Resources Command, through DD Form 1343, has been distributed to the appropriate agencies that need to know and update records, e.g., the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in regards to retired pay records.   

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010256



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021483



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009608

    Original file (20110009608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records to show she changed her last name when she divorced her spouse. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008527

    Original file (20140008527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 19 February 2014, shows her last name as "McN---." She stated her request was due to her divorce and that at the time of her retirement her last name was "McN---" as shown on her DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding an entry to item 18 of her DD Form 214 listing the name shown on the DD Form 4 she signed on 15 August 2002 _______ _ x _______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005880

    Original file (20080005880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that her name shown in her military records be changed from J___ R______ A______ to R______ A_____ H_____. Although the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) is not present in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), she essentially requested that her name shown in her military records be changed from J___ R______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004090

    Original file (20130004090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant contends her DD Form 214 should be corrected by: a. changing the narrative reason for separation to show her disability was not EPTS and b. changing her name as a result of her divorce and remarriage that occurred subsequent to her discharge from military service. The available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004974

    Original file (20120004974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to reflect her name change. Her last name changed from "Bar__" to "Mor__" in her service records; however, her name was then recorded in her service records as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__." The applicant's service personnel records show: * she enlisted under her maiden name of "Bar__, Kar__ Eli__" * her name for an unknown reason was changed in marriage to "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" * she retired as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009568

    Original file (20090009568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A few States treat military retired pay as the property only of the military person. The evidence of record shows that the applicant and the FSM were married on 14 October 1967. Since the FSM is deceased, there is no longer a “pot” of retired pay from which a records correction could be made that could pay her a portion of his retired pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016997

    Original file (20140016997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Reserve Component (RC) Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. The applicant contends, in effect, that the FSM's records should be corrected to show his RCSBP election was changed from spouse to former spouse coverage because their divorce judgment required the FSM to maintain SBP with former spouse coverage for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008327C070205

    Original file (20060008327C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She also states, in effect, at the time of their divorce the court ordered the FSM to provide SBP coverage and designate the applicant as the beneficiary. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant made a written request of deemed election to DFAS for former spouse SBP coverage based on the divorce decree. However, the evidence of record fails to show that either the FSM or the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM’s SBP election from spouse to former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002247

    Original file (20090002247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the document provided by the applicant is insufficient to warrant a change to the name recorded in her military service records and on her discharge document. In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s military...