Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015189
Original file (20110015189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    21 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015189 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960.

2.  The applicant states that this clerical error was discovered by his local Veterans Administration Office.  Reversal of the original error will correctly document that he was on the ground in Vietnam.

3.  He provides:

* Self-authored statement attesting to his service in Vietnam
* U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam Currency Control Plate
* Weapon/Mask Charge-Out Card
* Cam Ranh Bay NCO/EM (Noncommissioned Officer/Enlisted Member) Open Mess Card
* U.S. Government Motor Vehicle Operator’s Identification Card
* Armed Forces of the United States Geneva Convention Identification Card
* Picture of a Tropospheric Scatter Communications Vietnam Patch
* Six photographs, four allegedly of himself in Vietnam

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 September 1969.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  He served in Vietnam from 1 March 1970 to 26 June 1970, a period of 3 months and 26 days.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 28 July 1970, for Dependency and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Standby).  He was credited with completing 10 months and 19 days of net active service and no time lost.  He was also credited with completing 3 months and 26 days of foreign service.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not list the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.  Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing 6 months of service due wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant did not complete a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction to his DD Form 214 to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015189





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015189



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019340

    Original file (20130019340 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records shows evidence that he was awarded or authorized additional awards and decorations. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his service in the RVN and his authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the “Vietnam Service Medal” from item 13 of his DD Form 214; b. adding the following awards to item 24 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014123

    Original file (20100014123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 14 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100014123 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214, dated 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012145

    Original file (20110012145.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Driver and Mechanic Badge * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Cold War Recognition Certificate * three bronze service stars 2. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 23 January 1967 to 22 January 1970 and correct his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007082

    Original file (20080007082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam and all of his awards. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period from 5 November 1971 to 26 June 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing on his DD Form 214,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001874

    Original file (20090001874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 28 March 1969 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019008

    Original file (20080019008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 February 1969 to 2 February 1970 and to correct his military records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019288

    Original file (20140019288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004157

    Original file (20120004157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 25 March 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 19 March 1970 through 14 March 1972 and to correct his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016608

    Original file (20060016608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence showing that the applicant's unit was authorized award of the Presidential Unit Citation or the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for qualifying service in the Republic of Vietnam. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008528

    Original file (20110008528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instruction concerning individual and unit military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 as follows: a. delete the entry: "NDS SS M-16 Prcht Bdg VSM ARCOM CIB BS" and b. add: *...