IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 June 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140019288
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show:
* he graduated from high school
* he was awarded the Driver and Mechanic Badge for wheeled vehicles
2. The applicant states he only recently noticed the discrepancies.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a photocopy page containing a copy of his high school diploma and a newspaper clipping announcing his receipt of the Driver and Mechanic Badge.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 September 1969. After completing initial training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A (Light Vehicle Driver). He was later awarded MOS 64C (Heavy Vehicle Driver). The highest rank/grade held was specialist four/E-4.
3. He served in Vietnam from 24 August 1970 to 23 August 1971. He has qualifying service for two campaigns (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII and Consolidation I, respectively).
4. He was honorably released from active duty on 28 September 1972. His DD Form 214 showed he completed 3 years of net active creditable service.
a. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* two overseas service bars
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
b. Item 30 (Remarks) shows civilian education as 11 years.
5. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following entries:
a. Item 32 (Civilian Education) shows an entry regarding high school with 11 years completed.
b. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows:
* Principal Duty as a Heavy Vehicle Driver from on or about 2 September 1970 to on or about 15 September 1970 while assigned to the 572nd Transportation Company (Medium Truck Cargo)
* Principal Duty as Medium Truck Drive from on or about 16 September 1970 to on or about 28 November 1970 while assigned to the 543rd Transportation Company (Light Truck 5 Ton)
* Principal Duty as a Heavy Vehicle Driver from on or about 29 November 1970 to on or about 20 August 1970 while assigned to the 321st Transportation Company (Medium Truck Cargo)
* All entries addressing conduct and efficiency are shown as excellent
c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the award of the Driver and Mechanic Badge.
6. His official military personnel file (OMPF) does not contain either a high school diploma or orders showing the award of the Driver and Mechanic Badge.
7. The applicant provides a photocopy showing:
* he was awarded his high school diploma on 12 June 1970
* a newspaper article announcing he was awarded the Driver and Mechanic Badge while serving in Vietnam and assigned to the 321st Transportation Company; a portion of the article states he maintained a record of accident-free driving with no traffic violations
8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed policy and procedures for the completion of the DD Form 214. Regarding civilian education it stated the DD Form 214 should show the highest civilian education level attained, with the source for this entry being the DA
Form 20.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes policies and procedures for military awards.
a. The award of the Driver and Mechanic Badge is announced in orders and component bars are authorized only for the following types of vehicles and/or qualifications:
* Driver-W (for wheeled vehicles)
* Driver-T (for tracked vehicles)
* Driver-M (for motorcycles)
* Driver-A (for amphibious vehicles)
b. It further states the eligibility requirements for drivers require the Soldier to:
* qualify for and possess a current Optional Form (OF) 346 (U.S. Government Motor Vehicles Operators Identification Card), issued as prescribed by Army Regulation 600-55
* be assigned duties and responsibilities as a driver or assistant driver of government vehicles for a minimum of 12 consecutive months or during at least 8,000 miles with no government motor vehicle accident or traffic violation recorded on his or her DA Form 348-1-R (Equipment Operators Qualification Record (Except Aircraft); and
* perform satisfactorily for a minimum period of 1 year as an active qualified driver instructor or motor vehicle driver examiner.
c. A bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.
10. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows all units in Vietnam were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on DAGO Number 8, dated 1974.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. While his OMPF reflects the completion of only 11 months of high school, the applicant provides a copy of his high school diploma showing he successfully graduated. The copy he provides should be accepted and his DD Form 214 should be amended accordingly.
2. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the award of the Driver and Mechanic Badge.
a. His OMPF does not contain orders showing this award, but he provides a newspaper clipping showing the announcement of this award during his tour in Vietnam with the 321st Transportation Company.
b. The article mentions he maintained a record of accident-free driving with no traffic violations.
c. His MOS was that of a wheeled vehicle driver, he served at various times as a light, medium and heavy vehicle driver.
d. It is reasonable to presume the article accurately reported his receipt of this award and, therefore, his DD Form 214 should be revised to show this award.
3. It appears he met the criteria for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 29 September 1969 to 28 September 1972 and should therefore be given this award as well as having it added to his DD Form 214.
* there is no derogatory information found in his available record
* he received all excellent ratings for conduct and efficiency throughout his term of service
4. He has qualifying service for the following awards and they should be added to his DD Form 214:
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
BOARD VOTE:
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 September 1970 as follows:
a. Award the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 29 September 1969 to 28 September 1972.
b. Delete from item 24 the Vietnam Service Medal.
c. Add the following awards to item 24:
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Driver and Mechanic Badge with Wheeled Vehicle Bar
d. Delete from item 30, Civilian Education : 11 years, and add Civilian Education: 12 years (High School Diploma)
__________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019288
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019288
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004157
Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 25 March 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 19 March 1970 through 14 March 1972 and to correct his DD Form 214...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017782
The applicant states: * his last name is "Bourque," not "Borque" * he served over 3 years of honorable service [for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal] * he served in Korea from 21 September 1950 through 14 December 1952 and participated in six campaigns * he was attached to the 1st Ordnance, Medium Maintenance Company, when it was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation * he was awarded the marksman medal during basic training at Fort Dix, NJ in 1948 * he is entitled to the Driver and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007850
The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction of his military service records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The SF 189 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant requested his total service record book including medical. The NA Form 13045 shows that the applicant was informed the medical records he requested were lent to the Veterans Administration and referred the applicant to the VA claim number. The evidence of record shows that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088925C070403
No record, of this volunteer convoy, to his knowledge, was ever recorded back in 1968. Based on his service, he is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 2 August 1967 through 6 June 1969 and to have it added to his DD Form 214. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing, that the unit history of the 585th Transport Company include a record and give recognition to eight soldiers who took part in a volunteer convoy in 1968, be denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004010
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence the applicant was ever awarded the Driver and Mechanic Badge while a member of the USAR. There is no record of him serving as a truck driver in MOS 64C while in the NVARNG.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009073
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Forms 215, issued on 20 September 2007 and 21 May 2007 * DA Form 348 (Driver Qualification Record) * Special Orders (SO) Number 152, dated 15 September 1960 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Driver and Mechanic Badge. The applicant used the SSN "264-XX-XXXX" throughout his military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014339
This document shows a unit to which the applicant was assigned (57th Transportation Battalion (MT)) was cited for award of the MUC for the periods 28 December 1968 31 March 1970, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 52, dated 1974. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009774
Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicants DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows the applicant received Excellent efficiency and conduct ratings throughout his military assignments. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024502
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from his DD Form 214 and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * VSM with 3 bronze service stars * Driver and Mechanic Badge with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004426
The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the Silver Star. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.