Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014785
Original file (20110014785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  26 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014785 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect his service in Thailand.

2.  The applicant states he has been a life member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars and his Post recently closed and two separate Posts refuse to accept his DD Form 214 as proof of his service in Thailand.  Accordingly, he desires to have his DD Form 214 corrected so that he can continue his membership. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* a copy of orders
* a copy of his DD Form 214
* two letters of commendation from his unit in Thailand
* two internet articles

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 February 1968 for a period of 2 years.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, SC and his advanced individual training as a subsistence storage specialist at Fort Lee, VA before being transferred to Thailand on 23 July 1968.  He remained in Thailand until 15 July 1969 when he was transferred to Fort Benning, GA where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He completed 2 years of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his REFRAD shows in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) he served 1 year and 10 days in USARPAC (U.S. Army Pacific)

3.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the
DD Form 214.  The regulation, in effect at the time, provided that the major command (i.e., USARPAC, USAREUR, FEPA, AMEA, etc) for the last overseas assignment would be entered in item 22c.  The regulation made no provisions for entering specific dates of service in Thailand on the DD Form 214.  However, the regulation did provide that item 30 (Remarks) could be used to add additional pertinent information.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the regulation in effect at the time did not provide provisions for adding specific dates of assignment to areas such as Thailand, it did not preclude such entries.

2.  The regulation allowed additional pertinent information to be placed in the remarks section when needed.  Therefore, since there was no prohibition from making such entries for service in Thailand and since the intent of the DD Form 214 is to provide pertinent information to employers and service organizations, the applicant’s request appears to have merit.

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show in item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry “Service in Thailand from 19680723 – 19690715.”


BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X ___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry “SERVICE IN THAILAND FROM 19680723 – 19690715” to block 30 of his DD Form 214.



      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014785



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014785



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013894

    Original file (20110013894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s qualifying period of service in Thailand is not in question; however, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service in Thailand was in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating he or his unit served in direct support of operations in the Republic of Vietnam, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023717

    Original file (20100023717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. With respect to the applicant's foreign service, the evidence of record shows the applicant served with the 538th Engineer Battalion in Thailand.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006278

    Original file (20090006278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam and Thailand and award of additional foreign service credit for Vietnam. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not indicate that he served in Vietnam and Thailand or document his foreign service credit for Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in USARPAC/Thailand from 21 June 1967 to 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006943

    Original file (20090006943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam and Thailand. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. This form further shows that at the time of his separation the applicant was assigned to the 590th Supply and Service Company, U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001386

    Original file (20110001386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam area service in Thailand. The available evidence does not show he served in Vietnam or Thailand. _______ _ X___ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020041

    Original file (20100020041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 11 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007322

    Original file (20140007322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam service and the Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023014

    Original file (20120023014.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, item 23a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct MOS. Therefore, item 25 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the complete MOS designation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018649

    Original file (20100018649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence in the applicant's service personnel records shows that he served a tour of duty in Thailand with the 501st Field Depot, there is no evidence nor did he provide any evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017320

    Original file (20100017320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 21, issued by Headquarters, 40th Military Police Battalion, dated 23 October 1967, awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Absent such evidence, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...