Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001386
Original file (20110001386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    12 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001386 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam area service in Thailand.

2.  The applicant states he completed 90 days of temporary duty (TDY) in the Vietnam area (Bangkok, Thailand) from November 1971 to January 1972.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 March 1970 and he held military occupational specialty 94B (Cook). 
He was subsequently assigned to 7th Psychological Group, Okinawa, Ryukyu Islands, from on or about 15 September 1970 to on or about 16 January 1972.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list any foreign service in Vietnam or Thailand.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned as follows:

* 6 April 1970, basic combat training, Fort Jackson, SC
* 29 June 1971, advanced individual training, Fort Polk, LA
* 29 September 1970, Headquarters, 11th Psychological Operations Group, with duty with 18th Psychological Operations Company, Okinawa
* 12 January 1971, Headquarters, 7th Psychological Operations Group, Okinawa

4.  There are no permanent change of station (PCS) orders, TDY orders, or any other official documents in his service records that show he was ordered to or served in Vietnam or Thailand.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 7 February 1972 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  His DD Form 214 shows the following entries:

* item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC) for a period of 1 year, 4 months, and 22 days
* item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show any Vietnam service-related awards
* item 30 (Remarks) does not list service in Korea, Indochina, or Vietnam

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 22c would show the total period of active service outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed (e.g., USARPAC, etc.).  Furthermore, item 30 was used for Department of the Army mandatory requirements when a separate block was required for a continuation entry.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows that subsequent to completion of training, the applicant was assigned to Okinawa until he was separated.  The available evidence does not show he served in Vietnam or Thailand.  In the absence of PCS or TDY orders, or any other official documents such as TDY settlement vouchers, leave and earnings statements showing receipt of hazardous duty pay, or witness statements, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001386



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001386



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019624

    Original file (20110019624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the periods ending 1 July 1970 and 2 April 1973 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Letter from the Office of the Chief of Transportation * Letter from a former chief * Extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the detachment may have sailed out of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016586

    Original file (20130016586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 1 May 1972, to show his temporary duty (TDY) tours in Vietnam. The applicant's service personnel record shows he served in USARPAC-Okinawa for a period of 1 year and 6 months and his DD Form 214 properly lists this service in item 22c.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007322

    Original file (20140007322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam service and the Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528

    Original file (20120006528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018121

    Original file (20120018121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of foreign service in the U.S. Army Pacific. Change Number 11 to Army Regulation 635-5, effective 27 January 1970, prescribed additional entries regarding inclusive dates of service in Vietnam to be entered in item 30 (Remarks) section of the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003891

    Original file (20120003891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period 26 January 1970 through 19 January 1973 to show he served in Vietnam. Army Regulation 635-5, dated 23 January 1967, (and subsequent changes or amendments) in effect at the time of the applicant's separation in July 1969 stated: * In item 22c, for enlisted personnel show the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010712

    Original file (20120010712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected; b. the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with First Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device be added to item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized); and c. his Vietnam service dates shown in item 30 (Remarks) be corrected to show he departed Vietnam on 9 July 1971. Item 30 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006278

    Original file (20090006278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam and Thailand and award of additional foreign service credit for Vietnam. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not indicate that he served in Vietnam and Thailand or document his foreign service credit for Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in USARPAC/Thailand from 21 June 1967 to 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004503

    Original file (20090004503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not show he served in Vietnam for any time during his period of active service from 12 January 1961 through 12 November 1971. Item 24 showed no awards and Item 30 contained the entry "Vietnam Service None." Without this evidence the Board can take no action to correct his DD Form 214 to show this service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003213

    Original file (20150003213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect: * he was sent to Vietnam on TDY in early December 1971 * this service was not reflected on his DD Form 214 * TDY may have been viewed as trivial at the time, but this is not the case today * he requests the Board to note his December 1971 sub-voucher initially showed the payment of hostile fire pay (HFP); it was taken away from him when he was at Oakland Army Base...