IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 September 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090006278
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam and Thailand and award of additional foreign service credit for Vietnam.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not indicate that he served in Vietnam and Thailand or document his foreign service credit for Vietnam. He also states that his unit went from Fort McClellan, Alabama; to Seattle, Washington; to Saigon, Vietnam; to Thailand, where his unit stayed for 6 months. He never realized that Vietnam was not recorded on his DD Form 214 until he requested a copy of it.
3. The applicant provides copies of his permanent change of station (PCS) orders and unit roster, his Army Good Conduct Medal orders, a DD Form 1580 (Military Standby Authorization for Commercial Air Travel), a certificate pertaining to his absence from two government meals, DA Form 613 (Check List for Preparation of Replacements for Overseas Movement), his DD Form 214, three letters of support, and a DD Form 214 pertaining to another former service member in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States in pay grade E-1 on 8 March 1966 for 2 years. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 57E (Laundry, Bath, and Impregnation Specialist).
3. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), item 27 (Foreign Service), shows he served in Thailand from 21 June 1967 to 1 March 1968. Item 27 does not show he served in Vietnam. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served with the 257th Quartermaster Detachment (Laundry) and the 590th Supply and Services Company, U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC).
4. The applicant was honorably discharged from active duty in pay grade E-4 (temporary) on 2 March 1968 as an overseas returnee and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 shows he served with the 590th Supply and Services Company, Thailand. Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he was credited with 8 months and 12 days of total foreign service.
5. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 also does not show award of the Vietnam Service Medal, which would indicate service in Vietnam.
6. The applicant submits a copy of his PCS orders, dated 28 February 1967, and a unit roster which show his unit was scheduled to leave Fort McClellan for assignment to USARPAC with a reporting date of 31 May 1967. He also submits a copy of his DA Form 613, dated 16 June 1967, showing he received a Republic of Vietnam Orientation during his processing for overseas movement to USARPAC/Thailand. He further submits a copy of his DD Form 1580, dated 2 March 1968 and a map of Thailand.
7. The applicant submits copies of three letters in support of his request. The individuals stated, in effect, they were loaded on a cargo plane from Seattle, Washington, to Vietnam. All personnel and cargo were unloaded in Vietnam and the plane was reloaded with personnel to Thailand. One of the individuals provided a copy of his DD Form 214.
8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, specified that item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) would contain the total amount of active duty served outside the continental limits of the United States and the last overseas theater (command code) in which the service was performed, e.g., "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USARPAC)" during the period covered by the DD Form 214.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam and additional foreign service credit. He has not shown error, injustice, or inequity for the relief he now requests.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in USARPAC/Thailand from 21 June 1967 to 1 March 1968. This information is appropriately shown in items 12 and 22c of his DD Form 214. His records do not show he served in Vietnam for any length of time and the documentation he submitted does not show he served in Vietnam for 1 day or more.
3. It is also noted that the applicant was not awarded the Vietnam Service Medal which was awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service (attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days) in Vietnam after July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record failed to show the applicant's entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal.
4. A review of the applicant's DD Form 214 revealed that during the preparation of his DD Form 214 administrative errors did occur. The evidence shows his last overseas theater should be shown as "USARPAC/Thailand" in item 22c. Therefore, as a matter of equity, item 22c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the entry USARPAC as the last theater in which he served.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
____x____ ____x____ ___x_____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to add the entry "USARPAC" and by providing him a corrected separation document as a result of this change.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam and awarding him additional foreign service credit for Vietnam.
_____________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090006278
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090006278
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006943
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam and Thailand. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. This form further shows that at the time of his separation the applicant was assigned to the 590th Supply and Service Company, U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013894
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants qualifying period of service in Thailand is not in question; however, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service in Thailand was in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating he or his unit served in direct support of operations in the Republic of Vietnam, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the Vietnam Service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017320
General Orders Number 21, issued by Headquarters, 40th Military Police Battalion, dated 23 October 1967, awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Absent such evidence, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528
The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023717
Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. With respect to the applicant's foreign service, the evidence of record shows the applicant served with the 538th Engineer Battalion in Thailand.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027669
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the letter from NPRC, the evidence of record failed to show his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020041
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 11 July...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003964
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in Block 22 (Statement of Service) subparagraph c (Foreign And/Or Sea Service) "1 year, 0 months, 0 days" and it does not list the last overseas theater in which he performed his service. The applicant's record shows conclusively that he served for 1 year in Thailand with USASTRACOM in the United States Army, Pacific Command theater of operations. The applicant's record contained Special Orders awarding him the Expert Marksmanship Badge with Rifle on 15...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020837
The applicant provides copies of the following: * military records * DD Form 214 * VA Rating Decision CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 30 of this DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show his Vietnam service dates. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007772
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show the units he was assigned to while serving in U.S. Army Pacific and all of his awards and decorations. The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army and entered active duty in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 31 January 1966. The evidence of record shows the applicant served overseas in USARPAC (Thailand) from 6 July 1966 through 20 June 1967 and that this...