Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007742
Original file (20100007742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007742 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was a stevedore [a laborer who loads and unloads vessels in a port], but he was also in combat.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 August 1965.  Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) on 24 December 1965.

3.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to the 117th Transportation Company in Vietnam on 13 January 1966 as a supply handler in duty MOS 56A1O (Supply Handler).

4.  His DA Form 20 shows he departed Vietnam on 2 January 1967 and was reassigned to Fort Hood, TX, as a rifleman in duty MOS 11B.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 does not list the CIB in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  His personnel records do not contain orders which show he was awarded the CIB.

6.  The applicant was released from active duty on 10 August 1967.  His DD Form 214 shows entitlement to the following awards:

* Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star
* National Defense Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was a stevedore, but was also in combat; however, the evidence of record does not confirm he was in combat.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant completed infantry training and was awarded MOS 11B.  However, he served in MOS 56A while performing the duties of a supply handler with the 117th Transportation Company during his tour of duty in Vietnam.

3.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 governing award of the CIB requires service in an infantry duty position in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy.  The applicant's service record does not contain sufficient evidence that shows he was engaged in actual ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam.  Therefore, the applicant has not met all of the requirements for award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007742



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR2010000

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015830

    Original file (20080015830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel records revealed that there are no orders in the applicant’s records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations); the applicant's name is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014499

    Original file (20100014499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * He was never awarded MOS 76P2O (stock control and accounting specialist) and he only served in MOS 11B * He never went to advanced individual training (AIT) * His duty MOS was 11B in Vietnam and Germany * He reenlisted as an 11D (armor reconnaissance specialist), but he never got the MOS * The Combat Infantryman Badge was supposed to be on his discharge document * He would have stayed in the service and retired but the Army wouldn't give him MOS 11D, so he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014204

    Original file (20110014204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) * completion of the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course 2. The applicant provides a DD Form 214, DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Diploma for the Off Leash Scout Dog Handler Course, final transcript for the On Leash Scout Dog...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001472

    Original file (20120001472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Nothing in four typical sources shows he held an infantry MOS or was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge: * Item 22 (MOS) of his DA Form 20 shows he held MOS 57H * Item 27 of his DA Form 20 does not show completion of any infantry courses * Item 38 (Record of Assignment) of his DA Form 20 shows he performed duties of cargo handler in Vietnam and was assigned to a Supply and Transportation Battalion * His records do not contain special orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge 8. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002792

    Original file (20120002792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he served in combat with the 1st Infantry Division in Vietnam from September 1966 to September 1967 and he was not awarded the CIB. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he served in combat is not in doubt, there is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided any evidence to show he held the MOS of an infantryman, that he endured the hardships of an infantryman, and that he engaged the enemy in combat while serving as an infantryman. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024337

    Original file (20100024337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and all and any unit citations he is entitled to. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 4 August 1965, for 3 years. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007312

    Original file (20100007312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded MOS 11B and served in this MOS while performing the duties of a rifleman and a security guard with a transportation company and infantry unit during his tour in Vietnam. __________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014635

    Original file (20090014635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of either the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) or the Combat Action Ribbon (CAR). The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected to show that he was awarded either the CIB or the CAR for his service in the Republic of Vietnam was carefully considered. Although the evidence of record shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in an infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019274

    Original file (20110019274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He completed training and he was awarded MOS 11B. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with the qualifying infantry unit when it was engaged in active ground combat and that he actively participated in such ground combat, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.