Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017316
Original file (20080017316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 JANUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017316 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states that he was an 11B2O (light weapons infantryman) scout dog handler acting as a point man with his dog on numerous occasions.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on 5 June 1969.  He completed his basic training at Fort Bliss, Texas, his advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Ord, California and was then transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, where he underwent a 12-week scout dog handlers course.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 8 October 1969.

3.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 14 May 1970 and was assigned to the 42d Infantry Platoon (Scout Dog), 101st Airborne Division.  He was awarded the CIB on 10 July 1970 in Special Orders Number 192, issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), on 11 July 1970.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 16 October 1970.

4.  He departed Vietnam on 17 April 1971 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he was honorably released from active duty on 17 April 1971 as a overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 10 months, and 13 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

5.  A review of his records also shows that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no derogatory information in his records that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.  Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing 6 months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the AGCM.  It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941, and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943, and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953, and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service.  The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.

8.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit.  Additionally, he participated in two campaigns while assigned to Vietnam and is entitled to be awarded two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to add his award of the CIB has been noted and found to have merit.  The applicant was awarded the CIB on 10 July 1970 in competent orders and that award should be added at this time.

2.  The evidence of record also shows that the applicant is also entitled to have his records show his awards of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.

3.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 5 June 1969 through 17 April 1971.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.

4.  The applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.

5.  Additionally, the evidence of record also establishes that the applicant is entitled to award of two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  awarding him the AGCM for the period of 5 June 1969 to 17 April 1971; and

     b.   amending his DD Form 214 to add the CIB, the AGCM, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and to show he is authorized to wear two bronze service stars on his already-awarded VSM.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ________XXX_________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017316



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017316



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015797

    Original file (20140015797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the first award of the AGCM for the period 1 July 1969 through 6 May 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 1 July 1969 through 6 May 1971; and c. adding award of the CIB, AGCM (1st Award), Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Valorous Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104577C070208

    Original file (2004104577C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that during his RVN tour, the applicant served as an infantryman/dog handler in a qualifying infantry unit and was present with and personally participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 15 July 1969 through 7 December 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017460

    Original file (20090017460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003499

    Original file (20120003499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Social Security Number (SSN) as "xxx-x6-xxxx" instead of "xxx-x0-xxxx" and to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009362

    Original file (20070009362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with a separation date of 15 July 1969, be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the CIB. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000962

    Original file (20090000962.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 12 June 1969 through 14 March 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013886

    Original file (20140013886.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020052

    Original file (20140020052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028538

    Original file (20100028538.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 19 May 1969 through 16 July 1970; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * Company D, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), in duty MOS 11B from 23 May to 19 June 1969 and from 9 August 1969 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000619

    Original file (20080000619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 12 January 1970 through 6 December 1970. The applicant provides a PH Certificate which shows that on 20 July 1970, the 91st Evacuation Hospital awarded him the PH for wounds he received in action on 19 July 1970. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add his award of the PH to his record and separation document at this time.