Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010800
Original file (20110010800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  15 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010800 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of separation pay.

2.  The applicant states he did not receive separation pay and feels he is entitled to it.  He further states that military members who are involuntarily separated from the military may be entitled to involuntary separation pay, provided they have served for 6 or more, but less than 20, years of active service.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior service in the Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 January 1998.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 88K (Watercraft Operator).

3.  On 20 May 2003, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c for misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He attained the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued at the time shows he completed
5 years, 4 months, and 14 days of creditable active service during this period of service.  It shows he had 7 months and 13 days of total prior active service for a total of 5 years, 11 months, and 27 days of service.

4.  On 11 June 2005, he enlisted in the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG).

5.  On 2 August 2006, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (Kosovo Force (KFOR)) in accordance with Title 10,
U.S. Code, section 12302 (Ready Reserve).

6.  On 4 December 2007, he was honorably separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-13 for a personality disorder.  The
DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows he completed
1 year, 4 months, and 3 days of net active service this period.  It further shows he had 6 years, 5 months, and 24 days of prior active service.  His DD Form 214 does not address his entitlement to separation pay.

7.  On 2 March 2008, he was honorably discharged from the VAARNG and as a Reserve of the Army at the expiration of his term of service, in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4.

8.  Department of the Army Circular 635-92-1 (Separation Pay) outlines the eligibility criteria for separation pay and provides separation pay formulas as authorized by Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1332.29, dated 20 June 1991, and other Department of the Army guidance resulting from Public Law
101-510.  To be eligible for separation pay and benefits, the Soldier must meet certain criteria, including but not limited to:

	a.  The Soldier must have served on active duty, or full-time National Guard duty, and have completed at least 6, but fewer than 20 years of active service.  This service need not be consecutive; however, for Reserve component personnel not on the active duty list when separated, 6 years of continuous 

active duty or full-time National Guard duty must have preceded immediately before such separation (emphasis added).  A period of active duty is continuous if any break in military service does not exceed 30 days.

	b.  The Soldier's separation must have been characterized as Honorable (full separation pay) or Under Honorable Conditions (General) (half separation pay).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he is entitled to separation pay based on his cumulative total of active service performed.

2.  Department of the Army Circular 635-92-1 requires that for Reserve component personnel not on the active duty list (applies to commissioned officers) when separated, 6 years of continuous active duty or full-time National Guard duty must have preceded immediately before such separation.   While the applicant was on an active duty tour when he was separated, he was nonetheless still a member of the Reserve component, and was therefore subject to the additional requirement that his service be consecutive.

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was credited with completing over 6 years of active service; however, his two periods of service were separated by more than 3 years break in service.  Therefore, his 6 years of active duty were not consecutive.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  __x______  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025664



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010800



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011095

    Original file (20110011095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the grade/rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 15 November 2006 and the issuance of back pay from 15 November 2006 to 4 December 2007. These orders demoted him from SGT to SPC, effective 16 February 2007, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), chapter 10-3 (Reduction for Misconduct). The VAARNG pay records also show he was paid as an E-5 from 15 November 2006 to 15 February 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018957

    Original file (20140018957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the military records to show entitlement to separation pay. Records show the applicant was released from active duty from the Regular Army and did not receive separation pay at that time and did not sign a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) agreeing to a Reserve Service agreement for not less than 3 years prior to being separated. The applicant's request for correction of the records to show eligibility for separation pay was carefully considered and it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027438

    Original file (20100027438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also provided VAARNG Orders 339-312, dated 5 December 2006, which show he was honorably discharged from active duty on 17 August 2006. Item 18 – adding the following entries: * ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM PER 10 USC SECTION 12302 * SERVICE IN IRAQ/KUWAIT FROM 20040303-20050330 * SOLDIER COMPLETED PERIOD FOR WHICH ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSE OF POSTSERVICE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003309

    Original file (20150003309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 July 1992, VAARNG published Orders 146-57 discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) effective 31 July 1992 by reason of being an unsatisfactory participant, in accordance with chapter 8 of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management). This regulation states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when he or she accrues nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills during a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001419

    Original file (20090001419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests credit of 50 retirement points per year from the date of discharge from the USAR Control Group on 20 April 1998 to the date of transfer to Retired Reserve status. The applicant contends that his discharge orders should be revoked and he should be transferred to the Retired Reserve and that he should be granted 50 retirement points for each year from the date he was discharged from the USAR until the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. With respect to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011178

    Original file (20120011178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 April 1997 and served on active duty as an infantryman until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 29 July 2001 due to completion of required service. Accordingly, there appears to be no error or injustice in his case and therefore is no reason to grant his request to issue him an RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006207C070208

    Original file (040006207C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) failed to inform him of the retirement for physical disability based on 15 years of service. The applicant was discharged from the VAARNG and as a Reserve of the Army on his ETS, 11 August 1995. The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024368

    Original file (20100024368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). On 11 October 2005, she enlisted in the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) and she was promoted to the rank of SGT on that date. While attending OCS, the applicant requested disenrollment because she was moving to Arkansas.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002270

    Original file (20110002270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was placed in the Retired Reserve with 19 years and 6 months of active duty service, but was told he had enough time for an active duty retirement. The second COA would be to authorize the VAARNG to reinstate the Soldier until he reaches 20 years of active service, at which time the VAARNG would retire the Soldier at the end of the 6-month period with back pay for 6 months. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015080

    Original file (20140015080.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 8 January 2002 to 7 January 2003 to show in: a. item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) that he held the rank of sergeant (SGT) rather than specialist (SPC); b. item 4b (Pay Grade) that he held the pay grade of E-5 rather than E-4; c. item 11 (Primary Specialty) that he also...