Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010385
Original file (20110010385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  3 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010385 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 23 March 1973 be corrected to show that the first digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is a “3.”

2.  The applicant states that his last DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that the first digit of his SSN is a “5,” when in fact it is a “3.”

3.  The applicant provides copies of his first and last DD Forms 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 April 1967 for a period of     3 years.  At the time of his enlistment the first digit of his SSN was recorded as a “3.”  He completed his training as a Hercules Missile Crewman and was transferred to Alaska on 22 September 1967.

3.  On 16 January 1968 he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge reflects that the first digit of his SSN is a “3.”

4.  On 17 January 1968 he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and assignment to Vietnam.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 12 March 1968 and served there until he departed as a patient on 23 November 1969.  He was subsequently assigned to Fort Bliss, Texas.

5.  On 31 May 1970 he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge reflects that the first digit of his SSN is a “3.”

6.  On 1 June 1970 he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and assignment to Vietnam. He was transferred to Vietnam on 13 August 1970 and served there until 12 March 1972 when he was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas, where he remained until 23 March 1973 when he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) to accept employment.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that the first digit of his SSN is a “5.”

7.  A review of his official records shows that his entire service was performed under the SSN with the first digit of “3.”

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information as it exists in the official records at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 dated 23 March 1973 incorrectly reflects a “5” as the first digit of his SSN has been considered and was found to have merit.  All of the documents contained in the applicant’s records which list an SSN show the first digit as a “3.”

2.  Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that an administrative error resulted in his SSN being incorrectly reflected on his DD Form 214 dated 23 March 1973 as having a “5" in the first digit.

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 dated 23 March 1973 should be corrected to show the first digit of his SSN in block 3 is a “3.” 

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the first digit of his SSN as depicted on his DD Form 214 dated 
23 March 1973 is a “3” instead of a “5.”

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010385





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010385



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022765

    Original file (20110022765.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 dated 7 January 1974 be corrected to show that the last digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is a “1” instead of a “0” and that his Vietnam service as a warrant officer and enlisted member be added as well. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a copy of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024287

    Original file (20110024287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show the sixth digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is a “7” instead of a “9.” 2. He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows in block 3 (SSN) a “9” as the sixth digit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be amended by: a. correcting his Honorable Discharge Certificate and DD Form 214 to reflect the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021116

    Original file (20110021116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that a typographical error occurred when his DD Form 214 was prepared to reflect that the first digit of his SSN was a “2” instead of a “3.” 3. He had served 1 year, 7 months, and 3 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the first digit of his SSN was a “2.” 4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the SSN contained in block 3 (SSN)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010221

    Original file (20120010221.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. the last digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show "9"; b. his date of entry be corrected to show 1967 instead of 1962; and c. a second Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant states: * His SSN is not correct * He served from 19 July 1967 to 21 March 1969 * He was awarded a second award of the BSM while serving in Vietnam but only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091253C070212

    Original file (2003091253C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the citation should be corrected to reflect the applicant’s SSN and that his records be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that the SSN on the 4 August 1969 citation for award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device be corrected to properly show the applicant’s SSN. The Board further determined that the evidence of record shows that, in addition to the awards listed on his DD Forms 214, the individual concerned was also awarded of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010381

    Original file (20130010381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This pamphlet shows 5th Battalion, 12th Infantry, 199th Infantry Brigade was cited for award of the: * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 19 June 1968 to 31 July 1970 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971 * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period April 1968 to 31 August 1970 by DAGO Number 51, dated 1971 DISCUSSION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009067

    Original file (20120009067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the "V" Devices on his Bronze Star Medal and Army Commendation Medal. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted under the SSN of "xxx-xx-3xxx" and this is the SSN he used throughout his military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending General Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019439

    Original file (20120019439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending General Orders Number 10407, Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, dated 26 August 1969, to show his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009579

    Original file (20130009579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects in item 3 that the second digit of his SSN is a “0” and item 22c reflects that he served 11 months and 26 days in Vietnam; however, he served 1 year and 1 month in Vietnam. The applicant lost his military records during his return from Vietnam and provided the dates of his service in Vietnam at the time his records were reconstructed in 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017158

    Original file (20140017158 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the first three digits of his social security number (SSN) as “391.” 2. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show the first three digits of his SSN as “391.” _______ _ _x______...