Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009579
Original file (20130009579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009579 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect:

* in item 3 that his correct Social Security Number (SSN) contains a “9” as the second digit
* in item 22c that he served 1 year and 1 month in Vietnam

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects in item 3 that the second digit of his SSN is a “0” and item 22c reflects that he served 
11 months and 26 days in Vietnam; however, he served 1 year and 1 month in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides a one-page letter explaining his application and a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 14 June 1968, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and his induction orders, DD Form 47 (Induction Record), and his application for an identification card all show his SSN contained a “9” as the second digit.  He completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam.  However, upon his departure from Vietnam enroute to Fort Eustis, Virginia, the applicant lost his official records and temporary records were reconstructed at Fort Eustis based on an affidavit from the applicant.

3.  On 1 August 1970, he was honorably released from active duty due to the expiration of his term of service.  He had completed 2 years of active service and he had 49 days of lost time.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release from active duty shows:

* in item 3 that his SSN contains a “0” as the second digit
* in item 20c that he served 11 months and 26 days in Vietnam during the period 29 December 1968 to 24 December 1969

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information as it exists in the official records at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect SSN has been noted and found to have merit.  At the time of induction his records were prepared to reflect that a "9" was the second digit of his SSN; however, when his DD Form 214 was prepared it reflected a "0" as the second digit, which apparently was an administrative error.  Accordingly, it should be corrected at this time.

2.  However, the applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects his service in Vietnam appears to lack merit.  The applicant lost his military records during his return from Vietnam and provided the dates of his service in Vietnam at the time his records were reconstructed in 1970.

3.  Accordingly, since there are no records to show exactly what period he served in Vietnam, it must be presumed that the dates he provided 40+ years ago were as close to being as accurate as possible.
4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to change the dates of his service in Vietnam.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the SSN entry in item 3 of his DD Form 214 and adding the SSN as it is listed on his DD Form 47.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the period he served in Vietnam.  




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009579



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009579



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012181

    Original file (20080012181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time contains the number “5” as the last digit of his SSN. The evidence of record confirms the SSN under which the applicant entered active duty and under which he performed his active duty service contains the number “5” as the last digit, and not the number “9” as listed on his BSM order, certificate, and citation. The SSN entered on the DD Form 47 prepared on him during induction, the DA Form 20 prepared on him upon his entry on active duty, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014197

    Original file (20130014197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the SSN on his DD Form 214 is not correct; his SSN has a 9 as the second digit and not a 5. Item 3 (SSN) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows his SSN with the second digit as 5. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show his SSN as it is listed on his social security card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011076

    Original file (20110011076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 11 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011076 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The orders and documents in the applicant's military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) that contain an SSN list it containing the number 5 as the second digit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002630

    Original file (20090002630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 2 (Service Number [SN]), item 3 (Social Security Number [SSN]), and item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his complete SN, correct SSN, and to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster with "V” (Valor) Device, Air Medal (AM),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012311

    Original file (20090012311.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). While there is insufficient documentation and evidence to correct the applicant's record and DD Form 214 by adding a second or subsequent award of the BSM, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for this award by submitting a request with an award recommendation and supporting evidence through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024396

    Original file (20110024396.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 August 1969. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains two documents listing the SSN using the number “8” as the second digit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 3 of his DD Form 214 by replacing the second digit of the SSN listed in item 3 with the number "6" as it is listed on his SSN card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018406

    Original file (20120018406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his social security number (SSN) with the last digit as "2" vice "8" * the dates of his foreign service in Vietnam 2. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the entry in item 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007862

    Original file (20110007862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his service number (SN) and social security number (SSN) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 7 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that item 2 of the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected to show the fifth digit of his SN as "2" and that item 3 of his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the second and third digits of his SSN as “83.” _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019980

    Original file (20080019980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record, which includes a DD Form 47 and induction orders, and the DA Form 20 prepared upon his entry on active duty, confirms the applicant enlisted and served using his SSN that contained the number 9 as the third digit, which has been verified as his correct SSN by the SSA. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 7 February 1968 through 31 January 1970, and to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006098

    Original file (20110006098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect the second digit of his social security number (SSN) as "5" instead of "6." The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects the second digit of his SSN as "6" instead of "5." A review of his records shows that only two documents are contained in his official records (other than the DD Form 214) that contain the applicant's SSN, the DA Form 3027...