Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010312
Original file (20110010312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010312 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 or sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and for his lost time to be removed from his DD Form 214.  

2.  The applicant states he never got the recognition he deserved while serving at Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry, Korea, where he worked in an E-6 slot.  He was not expecting to get paid for doing an E-6 job but he did hope to get promoted to E-4 or E-5.  Instead, he was misunderstood and his life was made a living hell.  He got an honorable discharge and his rank and special court-martial should have not been included on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214, DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), DA Form 2166-5 (Enlisted Efficiency Report), DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) summary of benefits letter.

4.  On 20 June 2011, a letter, dated 8 June 2011, was received from the applicant wherein he stated he was concerned about a recent letter he received from the VA about personal data that was stolen.  He requested his letter be forwarded to the person responsible for the VA letter he received as he is looking for an update on the status.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 July 1973 and he held primary military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and secondary MOS 63B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic).  He was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

3.  He was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry, Korea from 1 January 1974 through 24 January 1975.

4.  On 5 December 1974, he received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for wrongfully using reproachful words, gestures, and for pushing and grabbing the clothing of another Soldier.  The punishment imposed was the forfeiture of $60.00 for one month, 14 days restriction, and reduction from the rank/grade of private first class/E-3 to private (PV2)/E-2.

5.  He was assigned to HHC, 3rd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, CO, from 18 February through 8 August 1975.

6.  On 19 May 1975, he was placed in pre-trial confinement pending a special court-martial.

7.  On 6 June 1975, he pled guilty to and was convicted by a special court-martial for failing to go to his appointed place of duty on 4 April 1975, unlawfully striking another Soldier in the face with his fist on 11 March 1975, and unlawfully striking another Soldier in the face with his fist and on the back with a pool cue on 22 February 1975.  He was sentenced to forfeiture of $100.00 for one month, 35 days of confinement, and reduction from the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 to private (PV1)/E-1.
8.  On 19 June 1975, the adjudged sentence was approved and the portion of confinement that had not occurred was suspended until 13 August 1975.

9.  On 15 July 1975, a DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Enlistment/Reenlistment Certificate) against him was approved by the appropriate authority.   He was not recommended for further military service due to his attitude and behavior that alienated him from his peers and leaders and created a climate of hostility throughout the company.  

10.  He was honorably released from active duty on 8 August 1975 in the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active service with 18 days of lost time.

11.  Item 6a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 6b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows "PV1" and "E-1" respectively.

12.  Item 27 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows "18 days lost under 10 U.S. Code 972 from 19 May - 5 June 1975, inclusive."

13.  The applicant provides DA Form 2166-5, dated 9 January 1975, wherein he was rated for his duty performance while serving in HHC, 1st Battalion, 32d Infantry, as a wheeled vehicle mechanic in duty MOS 63B1O.  His rater, a chief warrant officer four, stated the applicant performed his duties well and contributed greatly to the unit maintenance effort when the battalion was short of qualified personnel.  The rater also stated the applicant did not get along with his co-workers or supervisors because of his outspoken nature.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated, in pertinent part, the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  In item 6a and item 6b enter the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.  In item 18 identify any non-creditable time lost under 10 U.S. Code 972.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was reduced to the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 on 19 June 1975 and he held this rank through his separation date of 8 August 1975.  In addition, he had 18 days of lost time due to his pre-trial confinement from 19 May through 5 June 1975.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  As such, his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his rank/grade as PV1/E-1 and the 18 days of lost time he incurred.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

2.  With respect to his request that his 8 June 2011 letter be forwarded to the VA, that action is not within the purview of this Board.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010312





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010312



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200

    Original file (20100018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001591

    Original file (20110001591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show: * completion of Air Assault School * award of the Air Assault Badge * his rank/grade as corporal (CPL)/E-4 * he served as a squad leader in an anti-tank platoon 2. * Items 6a and 6b show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders * Item 7 shows the date of rank * Item 26 shows all awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015624

    Original file (20080015624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 18 October 1974 (prepared), shows the applicant’s promotions and reductions. The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation is entered in Item 6a and the effective date of promotion to the current pay grade (from the most recent promotion or reduction order) is entered in Item 6b. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021349

    Original file (20130021349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was promoted in 1975 or 1976 as an acting noncommissioned officer (NCO) in the rank of SGT * his promotion was omitted from his DD Form 214 and kept out of his personnel records * he is eligible for the KDSM for his service in Korea during the period 1974-1975 3. The DD Form 214 he was issued does not show the KDSM as an authorized award. Since there is no evidence of record showing he was recommended for promotion to SGT by a promotion selection board and placed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008705

    Original file (20100008705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of items 6a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 6b (Pay Grade), and 7 (Date of Rank) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). The promotion orders which show the applicant was promoted to PFC on 30 June 1975 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 6a, 6b, and 7 on the applicant's DD Form 214. In addition, it would be appropriate to issue him a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 12 June 1978, which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012871

    Original file (20060012871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, United States Code, Section 3964, provides that a retired enlisted member or warrant officer of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his active service plus his service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant held and was serving as an SFC/E-7 at the time of his REFRAD for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000197

    Original file (20100000197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 6 August 1977, to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. His rank and grade at the time of release from active duty was PV1/E-1. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was promoted beyond this rank/grade while on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021980

    Original file (20100021980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his ombudsman pay as a military officer who attained the rank/grade of captain (CPT)/O-3 in December 1977 as stated on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). On 25 November 2009, the applicant was notified by the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) that the application he submitted, Docket Number AR20090011693, dated 25 June 2009, wherein he requested correction of his military records to show he was serving as an ombudsman while he was on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014838

    Original file (20140014838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * DA Form 2139 (Military Pay Voucher) * DD Form 214 * Orders Number D-07-908632 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. d. A Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel to Grade E-5 memorandum, dated 30 January 1975, wherein his name is listed as being recommended for promotion to pay grade E-5. The regulation states items 6a and 6b would list the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and item 7 would list the effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013833

    Original file (20060013833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013833 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 28 February 1975, the applicant was notified of her pending separation under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message DAPE-MPE 011510Z August 1973 Subject: Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees Before 180...