Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000197
Original file (20100000197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  6 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000197 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 6 August 1977, to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 lists an incorrect rank and grade.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 6 August 1977.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG) in the rank of PV1/E-1 for a period of 6 years on 23 January 1977.

3.  He was subsequently ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 8 May 1977, completed training, and he was awarded military occupational specialty 62M (Forklift and Loader Operator).

4.  He was honorably released from ADT on 6 August 1977 to the control of his ARNG unit.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 months and 29 days of creditable active service.  Items 6a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade) of this form show the entries PV1 and E-1 respectively.

5.  His records further show he was promoted within the ARNG to SP4/E-4 on an unknown date.  However, on 15 July 1981, The Adjutant General's Department, OHARNG, published Orders 135-11 reducing him from SP4/E-4 to PV2/E-2 effective 1 August 1981 and further discharging him from the OHARNG to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) as an unsatisfactory participant.

6.  The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of service) he was issued shows he was discharged on 1 August 1981 as an unsatisfactory participant with a general characterization of service.  Items 6a (Grade) and 6b (Pay Grade) show the entries PV2 and E-2 respectively.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directed, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document was to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  Chapter 2 contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  Item 6a shows the grade in which the enlisted Soldier was serving at time of separation and item 6b shows the enlisted Soldier's pay grade.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to ADT on 8 May 1977 and he was honorably released from ADT on 6 August 1977.  His rank and grade at the time of release from active duty was PV1/E-1.  There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was promoted beyond this rank/grade while on active duty.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 appropriately shows his rank/grade as PV1/E-1.



2.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty (emphasis added).  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  

3.  The evidence of record further shows he was reduced to PV2/E-2 and subsequently discharged from the OHARNG on 1 August 1981 as an unsatisfactory participant.  His NGB Form 22 correctly shows his rank/grade as PV2/E-2.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000197



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014488C071029

    Original file (20060014488C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 5 months and 6 days of active duty service during the period covered by the DD Form 214. The applicant's record does show he completed two food service courses in 1972 and 1976; however, it also shows that he was awarded MOS 11B in 1976, and that he was ordered to active duty in that MOS. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011581

    Original file (20090011581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010312

    Original file (20110010312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 or sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and for his lost time to be removed from his DD Form 214. The applicant provides DA Form 2166-5, dated 9 January 1975, wherein he was rated for his duty performance while serving in HHC, 1st Battalion, 32d Infantry, as a wheeled vehicle mechanic in duty MOS 63B1O. The evidence of record shows the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021980

    Original file (20100021980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his ombudsman pay as a military officer who attained the rank/grade of captain (CPT)/O-3 in December 1977 as stated on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). On 25 November 2009, the applicant was notified by the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) that the application he submitted, Docket Number AR20090011693, dated 25 June 2009, wherein he requested correction of his military records to show he was serving as an ombudsman while he was on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200

    Original file (20100018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008413

    Original file (20110008413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 49 (Prior Service) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States) shows he was discharged from the Regular Army on 18 February 1977, in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001095

    Original file (20140001095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 January 1977 to show: a. her monthly drills (inactive duty training (IDT) periods) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from February to August 1976 as active duty service; and b. her rank as sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 January 1977 to show her monthly IDT periods from February to August 1976 as active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021202

    Original file (20090021202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6 instead of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 at the time of release from active duty. His record contains no evidence and he has failed to provide evidence showing he was promoted to the rank of SSG/E-6 during the period of active duty service covered by his DD Form 214. Evidence shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013742

    Original file (20110013742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to add: * his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service and USAR pay grade * all medals, awards, and ribbons 2. The applicant provides his DD Form 214. There is no indication he performed any periods of active duty between the date he was released from active duty on 30 October 1975 and the date he was discharged from the USAR on 21 December 1981 which would have warranted the issuance of a DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014698

    Original file (20090014698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. His DD Form 214, therefore, correctly shows his PVT/E-1 rank/grade at the time of discharge. With respect to his date of separation, the evidence of record shows his discharge was approved by the separation authority on 11 July 1978 and that discharge orders were subsequently issued directing his discharge on 7 August 1978.