Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008705
Original file (20100008705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  31 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008705 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of items 6a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 6b (Pay Grade), and 7 (Date of Rank) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).  He also requests an updated Honorable Discharge Certificate be issued. 

2.  The applicant states:

* he was promoted to E-3/private first class (PFC) on 30 June 1975 
* on his final day of active duty and during processing it was discovered his promotion to PFC was not reflected on his DD Form 214
* it was explained to him by the clerk handling his file it would take additional days to correct the discrepancy and would delay his expiration term of service date
* not knowing the full ramifications of his decision at the time and wanting to get on with his civilian life as soon as possible he agreed not to contest the error, he signed his discharge papers, and went on his way     

 3.  The applicant provides:

* Promotion orders
* Enlisted Efficiency Report (EER)




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 June 1972 for a period of 
3 years.  He served as an armor crewman.  Orders, dated 31 July 1975, show he was released from active duty on 31 July 1975 in the rank of PV2.   

3.  Item 6a on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "PV2" [private two].  Item 6b on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "E-2."  Item 7 on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "75 02 05." 

4.  Promotion orders, dated 30 June 1975, show the applicant was promoted to PFC effective 30 June 1975.

5.  The applicant's final EER beginning November 1973 and ending July 1975 shows his pay grade as E-3 and his date of rank as 30 June 1975. 

6.  Discharge orders, dated 23 May 1978, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the Standby Reserve effective 12 June 1978 in the rank of PV2.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The promotion orders which show the applicant was promoted to PFC on 
30 June 1975 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 6a, 6b, and 7 on the applicant's DD Form 214.  

2.  In addition, it would be appropriate to issue him a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 12 June 1978, which shows he was discharged from the Ready Reserve in the rank of PFC in lieu of the DD Form 256A which shows his rank as PV2.


BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting the entries in items 6a, 6b, and 7 on his DD Form 214;

	b.  adding the entry "PFC" in item 6a on his DD Form 214;

 	c.  adding the entry "E-3" in item 6b on his DD Form 214; 

	d.  adding the entry "75 06 30" in item 7 on his DD Form 214; and 

	e.  issuing him a DD Form 256A, dated 12 July 1978,  which shows his rank as PFC/E-3.  



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008705





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                               

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018774

    Original file (20130018774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows: * he was advanced to PV2/E-2 on 5 March 1976; there is no entry for advancement to PFC/E-3 * there is no entry to confirm completion of MOS 11B training * there is no entry showing award of the Army Good Conduct Medal 6. With respect to his specialty, the available evidence shows he began training in MOS 11B on or about 17 February 1976 and he was discharged on 25 March 1976 prior to completion of training. This Board corrects...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015624

    Original file (20080015624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 18 October 1974 (prepared), shows the applicant’s promotions and reductions. The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation is entered in Item 6a and the effective date of promotion to the current pay grade (from the most recent promotion or reduction order) is entered in Item 6b. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001749

    Original file (20150001749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice private (PV2)/E-2. It states items 6a and 6b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation. There is no evidence in his records and he provides none that shows he was promoted beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E2 from the date he was reduced to the lowest enlisted grade to the date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014149

    Original file (20130014149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was promoted to SP4 on the date of discharge. The available evidence shows the applicant was advanced to PFC/E-3 on 19 September 1974. In the absence of documentary evidence, such as promotion orders, memorandum/endorsement, leave and earnings statement showing receipt of E-4 pay, or any other documentary evidence confirming he was promoted or advanced to the rank of SP4/E-4, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021202

    Original file (20090021202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6 instead of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 at the time of release from active duty. His record contains no evidence and he has failed to provide evidence showing he was promoted to the rank of SSG/E-6 during the period of active duty service covered by his DD Form 214. Evidence shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011581

    Original file (20090011581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000892

    Original file (20100000892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his date of entry onto active duty in 1973 and his rank as a private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3. He states he entered active service in 1973 and upon discharge his rank was PFC/E-3. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant enlisted in the TXARNG on an unknown date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200

    Original file (20100018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001591

    Original file (20110001591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show: * completion of Air Assault School * award of the Air Assault Badge * his rank/grade as corporal (CPL)/E-4 * he served as a squad leader in an anti-tank platoon 2. * Items 6a and 6b show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders * Item 7 shows the date of rank * Item 26 shows all awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014488C071029

    Original file (20060014488C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 5 months and 6 days of active duty service during the period covered by the DD Form 214. The applicant's record does show he completed two food service courses in 1972 and 1976; however, it also shows that he was awarded MOS 11B in 1976, and that he was ordered to active duty in that MOS. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.