Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009505
Original file (20110009505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009505 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) (formerly known as the Distinguished Unit Citation), Air Medal (AM), and Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM).  

2.  He states, in effect, that he was informed of award of the PUC when he was transferring and that the information would be added to his records.  He also flew with the 118th Assault Helicopter Company.

3.  He also stated that he would like to be awarded the AFRM.  He entered the Naval Reserve on 8 September 1979 and retired from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 7 October 1999.    

4.  He provides:

* ASCV Form 131 (Awards and Decorations Qualification)
* Distinguished Unit Citation for Company A, 501st Aviation Battalion, 151st Transportation Detachment, 94th Signal Detachment
* 1999 retirement orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) on 19 February 1957.  He was honorably released from active duty on 18 February 1960 and he was transferred to the USMC Reserve.   

3.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 May 1963 for 3 years.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 68F (Aircraft Electrician).  He served in Vietnam from on or about 30 November 1964 to on or about 26 February 1966 and he was assigned to 151st Transportation Detachment.  

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 26 February 1966, as an overseas returnee, and he was transferred to the USAR.

5.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) lists the:

* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) (received in lieu of the Vietnam Service Medal)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

6.  There are no orders in the applicant’s military personnel records that show he was awarded the AM.

7.  On 16 June 1972, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction of DD Form 214) adding the release date of 26 February 1966, Army Good Conduct Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960.  The DD Form 215 also deleted the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation from Item 26 of his DD Form 214.  

8.  He enlisted in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) on 24 January 1989.  He was honorably discharged from the TXARNG on 10 November 1989 and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  He was placed on the retired list on 7 October 1999.
9.  There is no evidence of any disciplinary action during his period of active Reserve service.  There also is no evidence of a disqualification for the first award of the AFRM.

10.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Air Medal pertaining to the applicant.

11.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows his unit, the 151st Transportation Detachment, was cited for award of the:

* PUC for the period 10-13 June 1965 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, 1966
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 March 1966 through 26 March 1967 by DAGO Number 22, dated 1968

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  The award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but is also awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders is required.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the AFRM is awarded for honorable and satisfactory service as a member of one or more of the Reserve Components, to include the ARNG, for a period of 10 years.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General orders awarded the applicant's unit in Vietnam the PUC and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

2.  The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the TXARNG on 24 January 1989 and was honorably discharged on 10 November 1989.  He was transferred to the USAR.  He was placed on the retired list on 7 October 1999.  His service in the TXARNG and USAR totaled a period of 10 years, 8 months, and 14 days.  Therefore, he met the eligibility requirements for award of the AFRM.  He is therefore entitled to this award and its addition to his DD Form 214.

3.  With respect to the AM, pertinent regulations show that formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required for award of the AM.  His service records and ADCARS give no indication he was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal.  In view of the circumstances in this case, there is insufficient evidence to award him the AM or to have it added to his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to Item 26 of his DD Form 214 ending on 26 February 1966 the Presidential Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Armed Forces Reserve Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 
denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Air Medal and its addition to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009505



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009505


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006766C070205

    Original file (20060006766C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the separation documents of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his awards of the Master Aviator Badge, the Legion of Merit (LOM), the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon (ARCOTR), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation. The applicant provides a copy of the FSM’s death certificate, orders designating the FSM as a Master Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065879C070421

    Original file (2001065879C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), and all Air Medals (AM) to which he is entitled. There is no evidence that he was ever recommended for, or awarded, the BSM or the ARCOM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058970C070421

    Original file (2001058970C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that on 28 October 1964, he enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 further provides that the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. 5 In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066854C070402

    Original file (2002066854C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that as an infantryman in Vietnam, he earned the CIB and had enough air time for one or two awards of the AM. In order to have the PUC and MUC entered on an individual’s military personnel records, the individual must have served with the unit at the time the unit earned the awards. However, there is sufficient evidence to show that his unit was awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation subsequent to his departure from Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006519C070208

    Original file (20040006519C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board. This regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show that the applicant was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002294C070205

    Original file (20060002294C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, he desires the DD Form 214 to be corrected and brought forward in date to reflect the most current information, which includes the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The DD Form 214 is issued only upon REFRAD or discharge from active duty and the additional service to which the applicant refers was USAR service that occurred after the DD Form 214 was issued. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001722

    Original file (20140001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC). Since his DD Form 214 does not show these unit awards, it should be corrected to show them. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054861C070420

    Original file (2001054861C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further indicates it was never awarded. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the PUC (known as the Distinguished Unit Citation until 3 November 1966) is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides in pertinent part for award of the DFC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060831C070421

    Original file (2001060831C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Given his record of exemplary service, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for the period of 22 November 1965 to 21 November 1968. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the GCMDL for the period of 22 November 1965 to 21 November 1968, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the PUC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001677

    Original file (20150001677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in three applications, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Air Medal (AM) with 5 silver Oak Leaf Clusters (OLC), Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (2nd Award), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), and the Jungle Expert Certificate. Official orders in his OMPF confirm he was awarded the AM for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight in the RVN and Worksheet 131 confirms...