Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066854C070402
Original file (2002066854C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 2 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066854


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), one or two awards of the Air Medal (AM), the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation.

3. The applicant states that as an infantryman in Vietnam, he earned the CIB and had enough air time for one or two awards of the AM. He further states that the 25th Infantry Division earned the PUC and the 2nd Battalion (Bn), 12th Infantry Regiment (Regt) earned the MUC. In addition he is entitled to be awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 6 January 1969. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 31 October 1969 and was transferred to Vietnam on 30 November 1969, for duty as an infantryman. He was assigned to Company C, 2d Bn, 12th Infantry Regt, 25th Infantry Division. He departed Vietnam on 8 November 1970 and was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an early overseas returnee. He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training). He had served 1 year, 10 months and 3 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

5. He continued to serve in the USAR until 9 December 1972, when he enlisted in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG). He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the GAARNG on 29 March 1973 and continued in that status until 23 September 1975, when he was transferred to the USAR Control group (Reinforcement). On 13 August 1982, he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Ready) and continued to serve in that capacity until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank of major, on 26 August 1996.

6. A review of the available records fails to show that he was awarded the CIB on orders or that he was ever recommended for, or awarded the AM.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes the criteria for award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.

8. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.

9. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 51, published in 1971, authorized the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation for the 2nd Bn, 12th Infantry Regt, for service in Vietnam during the period of 1 October 1966 to 31 October 1969.

10. The pamphlet also shows that the applicant’s unit, the 2nd Bn, 12th Infantry Regt, earned the PUC for action in Vietnam on 21 March 1966. Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 25th Infantry Division earned the MUC for the period of January to June 1969. In order to have the PUC and MUC entered on an individual’s military personnel records, the individual must have served with the unit at the time the unit earned the awards.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant has failed to show that he was ever awarded the CIB and the AM or that he was recommended for those awards and they were not processed to completion. Accordingly, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to award them at this time.

2. However, there is sufficient evidence to show that his unit was awarded the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation subsequent to his departure from Vietnam. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award it to him at this time.

3. The applicant’s contention that his units were awarded the PUC and MUC is correct. However, the applicant was not assigned to those units during the period in which they earned those awards. Therefore, he is not entitled to have those awards entered on his records or awarded to him.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.








RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__fe ____ ___cjp __ __wtm___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _____Fred N. Eichorn_____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066854
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/05/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 141 107.0095/RVNCAHM
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002294C070205

    Original file (20060002294C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, he desires the DD Form 214 to be corrected and brought forward in date to reflect the most current information, which includes the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The DD Form 214 is issued only upon REFRAD or discharge from active duty and the additional service to which the applicant refers was USAR service that occurred after the DD Form 214 was issued. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010648C070208

    Original file (20040010648C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s medical records were not available for review by the Board. Inasmuch as the wound must be documented as being the result of enemy action and the documents do not substantiate either that fact or the date of occurrence, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence presented with his application or the evidence of record, that he meets the prerequisites of the applicable regulations for award of the Purple Heart at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003188

    Original file (20080003188.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, a copy of his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) and an article from the 9 February 1970 issue of the “Tropic Lightning News,” the newsletter of the 25th Infantry Division, which discusses combat operations of Company B, 3rd Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment. He had served 1 year, 10 months and 2 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017875

    Original file (20110017875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017875 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation the applicant is also eligible for award of the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, RVNCAHM FC Unit Citation, and 4 bronze service stars to be worn with his already-awarded VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073599C070403

    Original file (2002073599C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was initially assigned to the A Battery, 6 th Battalion, 29 th Artillery , 4 th Infantry Division as a cannoneer. Although the applicable regulation provides that the CIB is only awarded to personnel who possess an infantry military occupational specialty who are assigned to an infantry unit that engages in ground combat against an enemy; there were exceptions made through a published supplement which clearly indicates that radio operators who served as advisors in infantry or infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064776C070421

    Original file (2001064776C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was injured on active duty when his shoulder was dislocated while engaged with the enemy snipers in Vietnam. The evidence of record fails to clearly show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, in fact, the evidence shows that he initially injured himself during his infantry training and that his surgery was the result of recurring dislocations. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001237

    Original file (20080001237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and any other awards to which he is entitled and were not listed on his DD Form 214. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 21 June 1965 through 12 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069942C070402

    Original file (2002069942C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he awarded the Purple Heart, Air Medal and any other awards to which he is entitled. The applicant’s military records were not available for review by the Board. The orders provided by the applicant contain a list of soldiers from his unit who were awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against an armed enemy on 26 February 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901

    Original file (20110015901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with “V” Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...